Falcoholic 1,348 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 With all of the "Sack The Board" shenanigans going on at the moment all the focus appears to be on Mather and Stockbridge and getting rid of them.However, the ugly Easdale sisters seem to be really really quiet and I wonder just exactly what part they are playing in the situation at the moment.Can anyone shed any light on this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fantana 28,894 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 i'm interested on why your placing a slur on them given that they are not alleged to have done anything against the club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I agree brian.Why your comment falcoholic on the "ugly easdale sisters" and "their part" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Also agree with Brian Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Guys that actually put money into the club, unlike some of the minimob and they are getting called "ugly"?Strange. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcoholic 1,348 Posted October 8, 2013 Author Share Posted October 8, 2013 Likened to that fairy story Cinderella.Big like the fairy story that the board appear to be acting out at the moment.So now that we've cleared that up can we get back to someone to give us a step for a hint as to what exactly is their part in this debacle? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Easdales are putting their money where their mouths are. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,743 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I'm agreeing with everyone else, why not just ask the question instead of putting a childish spin on it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZZed 4,510 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Thump, 1 fell out the cupboard? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Likened to that fairy story Cinderella.Big like the fairy story that the board appear to be acting out at the moment.So now that we've cleared that up can we get back to someone to give us a step for a hint as to what exactly is their part in this debacle?Time to take the F out yer name pal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddistonKnight 1,567 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I really want to start a fight in an empty hoose, cast aspersions on peoples religious leanings, hurl a few accusations about, but I can't. I'm with everyone else on this one.Why the attitude? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I would reckon they are trying to make sure their investment retains its value. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 With all of the "Sack The Board" shenanigans going on at the moment all the focus appears to be on Mather and Stockbridge and getting rid of them.However, the ugly Easdale sisters seem to be really really quiet and I wonder just exactly what part they are playing in the situation at the moment.Can anyone shed any light on this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 That'll shed as much light as a blackboard at midnight. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Likened to that fairy story Cinderella.Big like the fairy story that the board appear to be acting out at the moment.So now that we've cleared that up can we get back to someone to give us a step for a hint as to what exactly is their part in this debacle?is that the debacle regarding people who won't put their money where there mouths are to run the club? The big rangers men we keep hearing about? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 That'll shed as much light as a blackboard at midnight. welcome to the rangers board saga! ;-) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedWhiteBlue1872 407 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Why do we persist with this "putting their money with their mouths are" pish...Buying shares for their own potential gain does not mean anything.Maybe im totally wrong but if they end up holding shares and selling on at a later date for their own financial gain, which is very possible and their own choice... Then whats so positive about that they are unquestionable?.Is it not Greens shares after all mostly?. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I'm agreeing with everyone else, why not just ask the question instead of putting a childish spin on it?Because its not a question its a veiled accusation.Another tactic used against us by the press and the media that is being utilized by our own supporters now for some reason. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,224 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Well this thread is really uncalled for....! In answer to your question which would read out "The Easdales are being quiet lately, has anyone heard anymore about what they are up to with regards to the club?" Then I have not heard a thing so far. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Another thread by a rebel supporter apparently.The rebel tactic - talk down everything the club is doing at the moment (even winning) whilst talking up MiniCollCo (deep pockets short arms section) and liken them to modern day Messiahs - unfortunately these Messiahs have deep pockets and very short arms.The smears and name calling is getting worse, which usually means an opponent is losing the argument.To paraphrase Brain Dempsey, "The rebels are losing the plot". Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutchy 1,200 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 With all of the "Sack The Board" shenanigans going on at the moment all the focus appears to be on Mather and Stockbridge and getting rid of them.However, the ugly Easdale sisters seem to be really really quiet and I wonder just exactly what part they are playing in the situation at the moment.Can anyone shed any light on this?You don't really expect anyone on a internet forum to know the answer to the question you've asked, do you? Really!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Why do we persist with this "putting their money with their mouths are" pish...Buying shares for their own potential gain does not mean anything.Maybe im totally wrong but if they end up holding shares and selling on at a later date for their own financial gain, which is very possible and their own choice... Then whats so positive about that they are unquestionable?.Is it not Greens shares after all mostly?.business works with people investing. It's that simple mate. The people wanting to run rangers have put next to fuck all in and would not take the initial risk in running rangers. Why the hell should they just be allowed to March right on in? Its like me trying to take over coca cola when I own 39 quids worth of shares. I would be chased out the door.They could have bought shares like many others and then if they wanted to try and take over, many normal bears like me might have respected them. But they are "rangers men" I guess. My arse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelee66 233 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 With all of the "Sack The Board" shenanigans going on at the moment all the focus appears to be on Mather and Stockbridge and getting rid of them.However, the ugly Easdale sisters seem to be really really quiet and I wonder just exactly what part they are playing in the situation at the moment.Can anyone come up with a lie/rumour that might show them in a bad light and make the board look bad??Fixed that for you.Why dont you just say what you mean? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
8Ace 49 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 business works with people investing. It's that simple mate. The people wanting to run rangers have put next to fuck all in and would not take the initial risk in running rangers. Why the hell should they just be allowed to March right on in? Its like me trying to take over coca cola when I own 39 quids worth of shares. I would be chased out the door.They could have bought shares like many others and then if they wanted to try and take over, many normal bears like me might have respected them. But they are "rangers men" I guess. My arse.How much did CG put in? £25k? Higher? Lower?Remind me how much he walked away with? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.