UKIP BEAR 370 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Spent a fortune on shares unlike the rebels Or are you going to say that doesn't count as he's bought the shares off a broker or Green? I'll say to you though that buying shares comes first before putting money into the clubThe fact is that RFC have not benefitted by one single penny by the easedales buying shares.ZERO ZILCH FUCK ALL.How can you possibly think buying shares off Green or a broker is better for the club than doing what thousands of us have and invested in the share issue.If easedale was to sell his shares for profit tomorrow,what would Rangers get? Yet again,ZERO ZILCH FUCK ALL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 We chase them away based on some rumours then?Sounds about right Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 The fact is that RFC have not benefitted by one single penny by the easedales buying shares.ZERO ZILCH FUCK ALL.How can you possibly think buying shares off Green or a broker is better for the club than doing what thousands of us have and invested in the share issue.If easedale was to sell his shares for profit tomorrow,what would Rangers get? Yet again,ZERO ZILCH FUCK ALL.But if there's no shares to be bought he has to go about buying shares off Green or specialised licenced brokers to get his foot in the door so he can investThis is really basic stuff tbh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 The Easdales actually did buy shares at first during the IPO did they not? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 The Easdales actually did buy shares at first during the IPO did they not?They probably did The fact is that without another share issue they couldn't possibly get enough shares to get their foot in the door without buying up off guys like Green I don't see the problem Maybe it's just me that doesn't get it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loyalfollower 1,543 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I would have to say that the easdales will be getting on woth their own business. Do they have to be doing something anyway? If green brought them in then id guess that most of the investors are happy with them except for the 28% we keep reading about thst have no names Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 They probably didThe fact is that without another share issue they couldn't possibly get enough shares to get their foot in the door without buying up off guys like GreenI don't see the problemMaybe it's just me that doesn't get it?I don't get it either. People defend the likes of McColl not putting money up because it would be giving this and that a load of cash.So what actually is supposed to happen then? Those who currently have the shares just disappear? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKIP BEAR 370 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 But if there's no shares to be bought he has to go about buying shares off Green or specialised licenced brokers to get his foot in the door so he can investThis is really basic stuff tbhTime will tell i suppose.All i can see is-i bought my shares at 76p each (or there abouts) and my 500 quid went to Rangers. (Or so we thought).Easedale bought shares for alot less (don't know how much) and none of that went to Rangers.Guess us fans are the mugs again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I wouldn't get too down over it There's the floated share issue that the fans could buy into but if you had a million quid and approached someone with a large shareholding like Green I'd assume you'd get cut a deal as he or anyone for that matter are free to sell their shares (any lock in periods aside) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Time will tell i suppose.All i can see is-i bought my shares at 76p each (or there abouts) and my 500 quid went to Rangers. (Or so we thought).Easedale bought shares for alot less (don't know how much) and none of that went to Rangers.Guess us fans are the mugs again.What does this mean? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,310 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Thing about the easedales is, they have not even publicly picked a side in this whole battle. It amazes me that they get so much stick for buying shares in Rangers.If the requisitioners had done things this way,(bought shares, and got a guy on the board) then I would have had a ton more respect for them.My head is fried with it all, but seeing these guys get slated for doing something we all wish we could do ( buy enough shares for a real say in the club) is beyond me regardless of their "alleged" and proven history.I honestly think they're in it for the long haul. Not only that but want to have a big say in the club and how it's run, hence buying all these shares. That's how it should be done. Like you say Gogzy, others would have got more respect had they taken this route too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 There does appear that there is quite a bit of substance to the rumours though...Enough that we can chase away willing investors in our position? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 In my opinion, yes.Well I disagree, I believe in giving people fair chances. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKIP BEAR 370 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Fuck the lot of them.When my Euromillions come up Rangers will be on the road to 10 in a row Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoniram 1,919 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Dave King - Tax avoider and welcomed wih open arms to invest in RangersSandy Easdale - Tax avoider and treated like a parasite even though he has spent millions buying shares in Rangers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
worcesterloyal 114 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 With all of the "Sack The Board" shenanigans going on at the moment all the focus appears to be on Mather and Stockbridge and getting rid of them.However, the ugly Easdale sisters seem to be really really quiet and I wonder just exactly what part they are playing in the situation at the moment.Can anyone shed any light on this?Buying shares and hoping to make a good profit when Ashley buys us Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgers 735 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Who if they could wouldn't buy shares in Glasgow Rangers. That is the question I have wanted answered from day one... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergio 1,199 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Why do we persist with this "putting their money with their mouths are" pish...Buying shares for their own potential gain does not mean anything.Maybe im totally wrong but if they end up holding shares and selling on at a later date for their own financial gain, which is very possible and their own choice... Then whats so positive about that they are unquestionable?.Is it not Greens shares after all mostly?.If a person invests heavily in the club, as the Easdales have done, then the only way in which they will see a return on that investment is if the club is successful and moves forward. If that happens everyone will be happy, well apart from the people who cannot get on the gravy train, even though they had a great chance of buying a ticket to it ..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Time will tell i suppose.All i can see is-i bought my shares at 76p each (or there abouts) and my 500 quid went to Rangers. (Or so we thought).Easedale bought shares for alot less (don't know how much) and none of that went to Rangers.Guess us fans are the mugs again.and so do I and many others. Share prices go up and down. part of trading and if they did manage to get shares cheaper than what we paid, then that's good on them. I'm sure they already owned shares from the IPO as well so they will have lost out for the time being on those shares. I have shares in Rangers that I will never sell (the IPO ones). If I go online today and buy shares at say 40p and they go up to 80p, I will most likely sell them. part of trading and doesn't make me any less a fan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKIP BEAR 370 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 and so do I and many others. Share prices go up and down. part of trading and if they did manage to get shares cheaper than what we paid, then that's good on them. I'm sure they already owned shares from the IPO as well so they will have lost out for the time being on those shares. I have shares in Rangers that I will never sell (the IPO ones). If I go online today and buy shares at say 40p and they go up to 80p, I will most likely sell them. part of trading and doesn't make me any less a fan.Doesn't make you less of a fan mate but doesn't benefit the club either,only benefits you,which is fine.Starting to get fed up hearing that the Easedales have put their money in crap.If anybody can give me proof they put any major investment into the ipo,when the club needed cash to survive,then i would applaud them.Im not going to hold my breath though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cammyfraserrfc 5 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 The Easdales are in it for the long haul in my opinion, talk is that they are actively selling other parts of their business to other bus companies. What a lot of fellow bears need to get their head round is that the club needs to be run as a business, not something that the owner(s) just throw oodles of cash at whenever we want them to. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
big dave mcpherson 95 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Well I disagree, I believe in giving people fair chances.thats all well and good but to many people your comments simply would sound ridiculous Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Time will tell i suppose.All i can see is-i bought my shares at 76p each (or there abouts) and my 500 quid went to Rangers. (Or so we thought).Easedale bought shares for alot less (don't know how much) and none of that went to Rangers.Guess us fans are the mugs again. you could of bought shares for less as well if you want, actually you could buy them just now, that is the risk you take. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
big dave mcpherson 95 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 you could of bought shares for less as well if you want, actually you could buy them just now, that is the risk you take. However as the guy said....at the time he was asked to buy for 76 and the money went into the club.......whereas now if he bought it goes into someone elses pocket Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 The easdales should deal with fan relations.I'd like to be a fly on the wall when double your money graham and resting in his account come calling.Be comedy gold Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.