LegendofCoop 17,718 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 First things first, we're playing great football, and remain unbeaten. All is going great just now, so probably shouldn't change something that's not broken.I'm just thinking that, with Tav in our team, I think he'd be better utilised as a right midfielder. There's no doubt with him getting forward so much, it leaves us open at the back. Now we have Zelalem in the team, we have someone who can pick a pass for players running the line. Would mean probably using Wallace as a CB, something he's not renouned for....but he has the capability to do it. I just think it would make us tighter at the back, while still having an excellent attack? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyson1872 2,923 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 No Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,181 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 No it is the way we play, will be scary moments, enjoy the good and the bad mate. It is a long time since I saw so many happy bears. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,690 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Nah. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Soprano 13,964 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Aye, let's change a whole dimension of our play by stopping our full backs attacking ffs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigAmo'sThighs 848 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 We finally have a fantastic, attacking Right Full back to compliment our attacking Left Full back, and you want to turn them into wingers or centre halfs? Why? That's exactly the kind of attitude we should be moving away from IMHO. We have a system that doesn't change, a style of play that allows all of our players to get on the ball and play a part in a functioning attacking team. Tav is a threat going forward because he's a talented player, not because he's a winger masquerading as a fullback. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Deacon 56,506 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Tav is a right wing back, a good one. Lets not try to make him into a midfielder all of a sudden Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendofCoop 17,718 Posted August 24, 2015 Author Share Posted August 24, 2015 OK, so its a no then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.E.C. 19,349 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 3-6-1 (or 3-5-1-1) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misteral 2,937 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 It won't happen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,449 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 3-6-1 (or 3-5-1-1)I prefer it the way it is. We need a couple of tricky players on the wing whilst having 2 powerful fullbacks bombing forward as well. You have to remember that our team hasnt been together for long.. Teams take a long time to get used to new systems and we are no exception. Give it time Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Aye, let's change a whole dimension of our play by stopping our full backs attacking ffs.Big Tav could play blindfolded with his feet tied together Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoplandStandBear 995 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Thought we had set up wrong yesterday and should have went 4-5-1 as the Hibs midfield was flooded and always looked to have a man up on us. 3 at the back is a nonstarter for me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chineseboy 1,563 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 OK, so its a no then. I think it's a possibility in the future if Warburton wants to change things a little. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Soprano 13,964 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Big Tav could play blindfolded with his feet tied togetherTrue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_r_sole 366 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 the whole point in having this system played from top to bottom is so that everyone knows their roles and it establishes a clear path into the first team, granted there will be tweaks but it won't be completely changing the roles of the defenders, wing backs and midfield Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrLaudrup 4,936 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Can see why you'd try it but IMO there is no need for us to change. For the first time in ages we have a standard formation with players being played in their correct positions and it makes such a difference. Also, by having all our teams play the same formation if their are injuries etc players can come in and immediately do a job. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thegummy 4,472 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 definitely not - our full backs are our best players Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 3-6-1 (or 3-5-1-1)Take Law out of that drop Holt back and play McKay behind Waghorn. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straight-Edge-Loyal 6,699 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 No stupid idea Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Take Law out of that drop Holt back and play McKay behind Waghorn. Why take Law out?; one of our best players this season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wearethepeople72 1,857 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Don't fix what ain't broken. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 25,246 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 the only reason id play 3 at the back is covering for wilson and kiernan who look decidedly dodgy when the ball is played in behind themother than that a wee tweak during games to counter things like a 4-5-1 is all thats needed (like our wingers dropping 5 yards to give the midfield 3 an easier pass etc) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rohan 25 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 When we have the ball it's basically a 2-5-3, the width is so important to the way we seem to playI guess any system can work well, but 3-5-2 often lack width so I don't think it'd be considered Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tannerall 25,935 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Now Foderingham's passing is getting better I expect Mr Warburton will soon shift to a 4-4-3. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.