jackrfc95 4,255 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 18 minutes ago, Smile said: But Windass issue is training related is that caused by the training? Crooks hopefully will come good looks very too footed a good sign in a player. You can't tell me the players brought in have been fit or lack injury whoever's checking them needs his books. He picked up an injury in training, I'm not sure what your point is? Windass has played 75 games in the last 2 seasons, looking into his background (which I'm sure they did for every player) would have told you he's hardly missed a game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,610 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 1 minute ago, jackrfc95 said: He picked up an injury in training, I'm not sure what your point is? Windass has played 75 games in the last 2 seasons, looking into his background (which I'm sure they did for every player) would have told you he's hardly missed a game. Is it the training that causing the injury, i thought it was self-explanatory. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,699 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 well done Rangers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumnockbear 2,446 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Dodged a bullet there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackrfc95 4,255 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Just now, Smile said: Is it the training that causing the injury, i thought it was self-explanatory. What is whether or not it is training related got to do with checking the players background with fitness/injuries when they are brought in? Your original point in relation to Crooks, Windass and Rossiter was 'It means we didn't look into their background properly and have players who have fitness/injury issues' which is completely untrue. Not sure what training has to do with any of that. You also said 'You can't tell me the players brought in have been fit or lack injury whoever's checking them needs his books'. This whole thread is rightly praising the people checking players coming in for not signing Lescott. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
folkestoneger 8,209 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 4 hours ago, centenarystand said: I wish no harm but pleased to hear this. Why? We obviously done something to fuck that deal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,610 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 3 minutes ago, jackrfc95 said: What is whether or not it is training related got to do with checking the players background with fitness/injuries when they are brought in? Your original point in relation to Crooks, Windass and Rossiter was 'It means we didn't look into their background properly and have players who have fitness/injury issues' which is completely untrue. Not sure what training has to do with any of that. You also said 'You can't tell me the players brought in have been fit or lack injury whoever's checking them needs his books'. This whole thread is rightly praising the people checking players coming in for not signing Lescott. I think if you are happy with the fitness and the injury list players that we seem to brung in that's more your problem than mine. You said Windass had a lot of games at his other club i said maybe it's our training that causing the injury surely you got that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,604 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Well done the Rangers Medical team.... /thread Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze 14,604 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 4 minutes ago, folkestoneger said: Why? We obviously done something to fuck that deal. yes we sure did..... like give a player a proper medical and background checks... him trying to save face with the "family reasons" shite is on him.... not us Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammy cox 664 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 43 minutes ago, jackrfc95 said: What is whether or not it is training related got to do with checking the players background with fitness/injuries when they are brought in? Your original point in relation to Crooks, Windass and Rossiter was 'It means we didn't look into their background properly and have players who have fitness/injury issues' which is completely untrue. Not sure what training has to do with any of that. You also said 'You can't tell me the players brought in have been fit or lack injury whoever's checking them needs his books'. This whole thread is rightly praising the people checking players coming in for not signing Lescott. I wouldn't bother sir.Some on here just moaning cunts who just want to moan about anything and turn it round to be the boards fault or the managers.A player gets injured it's the managers fault in training,or perhaps the board shouldn't have sanctioned his purchase.All about opinions but some as you see just fucking moan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
murzo 7,447 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 He was never good enough for our treatment table anyway, not a patch on Prodan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,287 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Dodged the bullet Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,610 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 24 minutes ago, murzo said: He was never good enough for our treatment table anyway, not a patch on Prodan. We rebuilt him(6million dollar man style) then let him go was a weird decision. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boybluesy 3,734 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 5 hours ago, loyalfollower said: Would've been good company for windass and Rossiter though N Crooks.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza27 15,292 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Cunt was too ugly to play with us anyway Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ianferguson 2,619 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 6 hours ago, STEPPS BOY said: Busted knee, laid up for 3-6 months. Still better than Kiernan.. TOO FAR !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
murzo 7,447 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 12 minutes ago, Smile said: We rebuilt him(6million dollar man style) then let him go was a weird decision. He hardly played after he left us either tho.Wikipedia says we signed him without doing a medical, another weird decision. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,610 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 3 minutes ago, murzo said: He hardly played after he left us either tho.Wikipedia says we signed him without doing a medical, another weird decision. It was odd at the time came with a big reputation as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,281 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 16 minutes ago, Smile said: We rebuilt him(6million dollar man style) then let him go was a weird decision. think he played for Romania in the days after he was freed. Never did much after that to be fair. "During the last five years of his career – Rangers included – Prodan only appeared in 33 matches combined while representing four teams, retiring at the age of 31" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
piperpete 3,186 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 2 hours ago, Smile said: Is it the trajured nning that causing the injury, i thought it was self-explanatory. If this wasc an ISsuev then a lot more players would be INjured Wouldnt you think ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loyal Bear 72 363 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 5 hours ago, Smile said: Instead, we signed injured Crooks Injured Windass and injured Rossiter. I don't know how anyone could criticise the signings of these 3 players. Without doubt the most promising signings Warburton has made since he came if you ask me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,610 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Just now, Loyal Bear 72 said: I don't know how anyone could criticise the signings of these 3 players. Without doubt the most promising signings Warburton has made since he came if you ask me. We haven't seen them enough to know if they are good or bad yet I'd say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugar_free_pizza 402 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 ah fuck it, I knee this was gonna happen Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loyal Bear 72 363 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 5 minutes ago, Smile said: We haven't seen them enough to know if they are good or bad yet I'd say. That's why I used the word "promising" rather than "best". I also don't think they have been here long enough to be classed as injury-prone and written off as a bad signing. Lescott is different. He's a 34 year old defender that had question marks over his fitness. The size of his wage would have made the Lescott deal high risk for our club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KWBear 1,640 Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Strange little person gherry mhcculloch thrown his toys out the pram on twitter after taking it both barrels off multiple bears. Wee weirdo. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.