***The Official Queens Park vs Rangers Match Thread***

[Shuggy 1,308]

Apparently a few hundred demonstrating outside Parkhead.

[julescotia 11,407]

EDIT

Wrong thread

[Dutchy 1,200]

Pat Bonner just saying that septic were caught in two frames of 'tought. they were certainly taught a lesson tonight, learn your lesson well ya counts.

[LineysLament 182]

Apparently a few hundred demonstrating outside Parkhead.

And another few hundred floating doon the Clyde

[Wearethepeople72 1,845]

How did we play?

[OzStyle 10]

I have it marked down for maybe the 17th of September

[Redsox1 1,361]

How did we play?

skysports details saying QP had 55% possession. Not many shots or attempts by us. I think the scum result will paper over the cracks of this one.

and of course we`ll get the people saying it all about the result but I think from now it should also be about the performances .

[Wearethepeople72 1,845]

skysports details saying QP had 55% possession. Not many shots or attempts by us. I think the scum result will paper over the cracks of this one.

and of course we`ll get the people saying it all about the result but I think from now it should also be about the performances .

Queens Park. Rangers.

Possession. 41%. 59%

Shots. 3. 10.

On target. 2. 4.

Stats from BBC website.

[Young Bob 1,360]

skysports details saying QP had 55% possession. Not many shots or attempts by us. I think the scum result will paper over the cracks of this one.

and of course we`ll get the people saying it all about the result but I think from now it should also be about the performances .

We ended up with Black, McCulloch and Peralta on the park. I have no problem with any one of these players playing in the midfield but not as a collective.

[72barca 1,788]

What happens to the motivation of all of these different teams of ours in so many different cup-ties?

[HG5 11,113]

Queens Park. Rangers.

Possession. 41%. 59%

Shots. 3. 10.

On target. 2. 4.

Stats from BBC website.

Now, which is better - BBC or Sky Sports?

There's only one way to find out......

Fiigghhhtttt!

[Creampuff 22,628]

By the sounds of the Twitter feed, Peralta had a good game.

[RFC55 108,936]

Can't see any stats on the skysports site

[Redsox1 1,361]

go to score centre and click on the rangers game. then click stats.

Rangers

goals 2

shots on 4

shots off 6

corners 5

offsides 2

yellow cards 3

fouls won 6

fouls conceded 14

possession 45%

stats from sky score centre

[HG5 11,113]

Can't see any stats on the skysports site

If you have the Sky Sports Football app, they 're on there.

And it does give them 55% possession, with us 10 shots (4 on target), them 3 shots ( 2 on target).

[RFC55 108,936]

If you have the Sky Sports Football app, they 're on there.

And it does give them 55% possession, with us 10 shots (4 on target), them 3 shots ( 2 on target).

Cheers mate was in through the mobile browser and could only get the teams and the score

[simplythebestest 2,145]

They'll be blaming the ref...

Honestly mate I spat my tea all over my tablet there. Thanks for that! :lol:

[quinty 1,445]

Just back, good performance, plenty of chances and unlucky not to score more. Wee man rattled the post and few other packages and slices. Never in any danger really and some good passing and movement.

[IbroxBurnzy 484]

Queens Park. Rangers.

Possession. 41%. 59%

Shots. 3. 10.

On target. 2. 4.

Stats from BBC website.

Queens Park. Rangers.

Possession. 41%. 59%

Shots. 3. 10.

On target. 2. 4.

Stats from BBC website.

These stats are similar to Bet 365 I was using that for updates in work and I remember thinking we had over ten shots to their 2,plus more possession which pissed me off as we were drawing at that point.

[STEPPS BOY 73,923]

In Peralta, We finally look to have someone who can provide decent delivery into box..

I'd like to see him at right back with Aird just in front of him.

That would give us decent balance..

[LegendofCoop 17,301]

Just back, good performance, plenty of chances and unlucky not to score more. Wee man rattled the post and few other packages and slices. Never in any danger really and some good passing and movement.

Appreciate the feedback mate. Sounds a lot better than the score suggested!

[Muirheadbear 1,483]

Just back, good performance, plenty of chances and unlucky not to score more. Wee man rattled the post and few other packages and slices. Never in any danger really and some good passing and movement.

Agree with that. It again highlights the need for a "no.10" or a winger on top form. If we had either or both we could have scored twenty goals in our last three games. The defence though us still the biggest concern. We just don't look capable of a shut out. There's always something going in back there and it only encourages our opponents.

Anywhere we're through which is more than can be said for the mhutants. I'm hearing whispers they were on the car park tonight.

[HG5 11,113]

Cheers mate was in through the mobile browser and could only get the teams and the score

Ah - I got it on the iphone app.

I think Redsox1 may have got it on his ipad!

So much information, so many sources.......

[RFC RYAN 2,967]

We played no too bad should have had more goals also had a goal chopped off. Good header from Boyd for the first goal we were excellent up until they scored god knows what our keeper was doing for there goal. Macleod hit the post and had one that missed by inches. Ref was shocking all night I think Law came off before he got sent off. Moshni was poor with his big punts up the park also told the fans to shut up when we scored our second and Wallace told him to shut up. Wasn't a excellent game too be honest but we done more than enough to win and should have been by a few more goals.

[Sweetheart 8,458]

According to their schedule it's the filths match that is on.

Yes they advertised originally for our game, then changed it for there's. Text commentary on here http://www.bbc.co.uk...otball/28846808