cp9

I'm saying the forum has a few retards. Kind of ironic I'm having to explain this. 

You must be the most gullible person alive on this planet.

That title will get more some amount of taigs racing to the thread, well played OP

Even my 12 year old daughter asked why there is always loads of police around our fans but not anyone else. 
And here’s the kicker, she then says “we never cause any trouble Dad” 
Those pesky 12 year olds for you. 

Was bizzare having 6 polis in the toilet yesterday watching everyone take a piss.
Equally bizzare having about 30 polis next to our section but only a handfull in their corner doing fuck all when coins etc were getting thrown at our players for corners. 

The fact that we were 5-0 down with 10 minutes to go and Rule Brittania drowned that shit pit out says more about our fans than anything else could.
 

Thanks for that .... I think!
Also thanks to @cp9 for meeting us at Ibrox today to collect 3 tickets. Cheers again.

That's a disgraceful statement, having a go at people for being loyal to the club.

To be fair you can't blame Murty for Morelos misses at 2-2 and 2-3 and both his first choice centre backs being injured.

If I was you I'd start a thread to encourage everyone to get the battle fever on.

Apparently the roar then turned into the Billy boys, Murty gave the pic of our queen a kiss for luck and Andy Halliday and Doc led the rest of them round the room in a mini parade.
Fucking love my club ??????

Just how good is it to have competition for places,  for a few seasons there half our team was made up of players regardless of how shite they were for weeks on end were never dropped.
A player with the jersey under pressure will always give that little bit extra even though sub consciously.

Rangers v Arsenal under the floodlights. 1951.

You never said it, but it was certainly implied. 
We've beaten them on numerous occasions when they've been 'vastly superior to us in every department.' Penalties usally help with that. 

You're right mate. Probably best we didn't score.
 
idiot. 

You're right mate. Probably best we didn't score.
 
idiot. 

Alves being fit is massive for me. So far he's been decent but for me this is the type of game we signed him for.

I agree. The hibs statement has had a far greater impact than any we could release 

Hamburg have never been relegated..So you are quite wrong..

Gonna stop letting facts get in the way of their fantasy please. 

This is the type of thing I would be throwing into the mix, obviously written a bit better haha.
 
Dear Stewart / Peter,
celtic FC Request for a Judicial Review – dated 25 July 2017
Reference:  celtic Statement dated 9 September 17 (Statement), Letter dated 25 July 2017 (Letter1), Letter dated 18 August 2017 (Response 1), Letter dated 21 August 2017 (Letter 2), Letter dated 4 September 2017 (Response 2), Letter dated 7 September 2017 (Letter 3.
I write to you in regards to the recent request from celtic FC for the SFA to commission an independent ‘Judicial Review’ events that led to the liquidation of Rangers Oldco and the governance issues arising from those events.
I feel it necessary to point out, that although celtic refer to a ‘Judicial Review’ in their Letter 1, they refer to a ‘Review’ in their Statement.
For clarity, a Judicial Review is a process whereby a court reviews decisions already made.  A Review is a formal assessment of something with the intention of instituting change if necessary.  As you can see, they are both totally different situations.  However, celtic FC refer to both in the same context. 
In letter 3, Peter writes “The board of celtic considers that a wide-ranging review offers the best prospect for drawing a line under this entire affair, allowing Scottish football to look to the future while learning from the past.”  Peter also mention ‘transparency’ on many occasions.
I am interested to know why celtic only want a review, judicial or otherwise, into recent events?  Surely, for the purpose of transparency in Scottish football, and to allow it to move forward, a wide-ranging review should cover all club members of the SPFL, their finances, possible criminal/civil issues that may have occurred. 
Surely only then, can the Scottish game move forward with integrity and transparency? 
Also worthy of note, celtic seem to have the backing of the SPFL regarding this request.  They claim the SPFL are requesting a Review on behalf of the member clubs.  However, a two minute search on Google brings us to Hibernian FC’s statement dated 11 September 2017, where they clearly show that they do not support further action/reviews.  Hibernian go on to say “In recent weeks, both the SPFL and SFA have taken extensive legal advice which does not support or encourage taking further action.”
Regardless of who is correct, and who is not, this one example shows that someone is not telling the trust, or, there are parties giving each other different information.  This could be accepted as more evidence that a wider-review of Scottish football as a whole, is required.
I have not obtained legal advice in writing this letter, it is purely based on common sense.

Vlad.

The scum are in a really strong position over this.
 
All 42 clubs back them - oops its only 2 so they lied. Even hivs disagree.
The top 2 legislators in Scottish football agree with them - oops only one does and he has an agenda and he lied.
They have the cream of the honest, moralistic and truthful media backing them - oops they don't,  they have Spiers, English, Thomson, ill Phil, Nuremberg Shug and Jum Spence. What a cesspool of bitter twisted liars.
Their best buddy at the BBC backed them up - oops Gollum discovered they had no backing and announced it.
BT covering up for them at games as usual - oops BT admitted they turned the sound down when the singing went to its usual terrorist songbook.
 
This has been a massive miscalculation by Liewell  which could get worse even if we do nothing. Its not over by a long way.

The bheast fc statement asks for an independent review into theevents surrounding our use of ebt's and subsequent governance. They say no review will mean a lack of transparency, accountability, leadership and fail to provide full facts. I am in no way a linguist, or well up on legal matters, etc. However can it be read into that bheast statement that bheast believes we were bumped to the lowest division, lost a team, transfer fees, tele money, sponserships and everything else, without tranparency, accountability, leadership or indeed the full facts. Maybe its just the way I'm reading it. But it used to be called a kangaroo court. Absolute cunts. Bring them down. 

Love how the OP feels the need to point out that 19:45 = 7:45pm.
It's this sort of attention to detail that ensures we all hate him on a consistent basis.