No Celtic players have ever been good enough for Rangers!

[RFC55 109,123]

Shut the thread KPL so we dont get the usual pish from some posters and this turns into a debate about which wife beating alkie crackhead we would have here

[TheMenace72 133]

Kenny Dalglish.

[West-Enclosure-Bear 0]

considering we have kenny miller. the thread title isn't that true.

and we had mo Johnstone. :chopometer:

[bluenose4life 5]

Dalglish, Hartson, Larson. thats it.

[supermac 115]

I always thought Anton Rogan would have made a cracking keeper for us if I'm perfectly honest

[minstral 5,375]

None of them are good enough to play for our club.

[mongolikecandy 418]

Hartson should have been our player!

Post of the night

[simplythebest 11,453]

Post of the night

That 'failed a medical' stuff was really one of the biggest jokes ever.

[Simmy17 8]

Kenny miller ?

[keithgersbear 3,225]

You need the spirit to play for Rangers. That something which no Celtic player has ever had. No Celtic player could ever of been good enough for Rangers. They simply would not have it.

[Smile 26,610]

Kenny Miller

[Sir Walter 0]

At specific time periods there would have been of course.

Imagine mols and larsson. Etc

[Jesus 0]

Anybody who genuinely thinks no Celtic players would have improved a Rangers team (and vice versa) is frankly an idiot. Larsson, Sutton, Moravcik, cadete are all great players. I'm too young to have seen Dalgliesh or Jimmy Johnston or anyone like that playing but theres no doubt they were good enough too.

[ChrisNZ 0]

Many a post about Kenny Miller, have to agreed with them there

But he was a Ranger first.

[dundeebear3 0]

Yes I am serious, so you don't think any players they have ever had would have improved us

I can understand your dislike of all things Celtic but your above statement is simply ridiculous.

[Ozblue 4,331]

If guys like Willie Wallace, Tommy Gemmell, Murdo MacLeod, Danny McGrain and Kenny Dalglish hadn't played for them would older Bears have taken them? Were before my time so I can't really comment.

We should have had Bertie Peacock, Danny McGrain and Kenny Dalglish because they were all Rangers fans and were good enough skill wise, but for some reason or another, they were passed up by our managers of the time...so as far as I'm concerned-------End of fucking Story!

[StayWestFree 107]

Pisher of a thread.

[bawbaggery 0]

The OP should address the question to various Rangers managers, including Souness and Walter.

[TravelingWilBEARy 4,319]

Well, this was a fascinating thread.

[*Manticore* 1,893]

Anybody who genuinely thinks no Celtic players would have improved a Rangers team (and vice versa) is frankly an idiot. Larsson, Sutton, Moravcik, cadete are all great players. I'm too young to have seen Dalgliesh or Jimmy Johnston or anyone like that playing but theres no doubt they were good enough too.

Jimmy Johnstone would only have got a game for Rangers if Henderson was injured, which wasn't often.

[Poetry_In_Blue 1,043]

Jimmy Johnstone would only have got a game for Rangers if Henderson was injured, which wasn't often.

And there is the crux of the matter, when some of the players who have been mentioned were kicking about they would have had difficulty getting into our team due to the quality of the players we had at the initial time.

Anyway interesting debate but the OP has been banned so who cares.

[Creampuff 22,628]

There is not one player from that mob, in their history, that I would have been glad to see in a Rangers shirt. That's not simply due to the fact they played for them, it's just because pure and simple, Celtic aren't good enough.

[TravelingWilBEARy 4,319]

There is not one player from that mob, in their history, that I would have been glad to see in a Rangers shirt. That's not simply due to the fact they played for them, it's just because pure and simple, Celtic aren't good enough.

Kenny Miller

[*Manticore* 1,893]

Which is why so many of us disagreed with him being signed.

[TravelingWilBEARy 4,319]

Which is why so many of us disagreed with him being signed.

He's proved that he was good enough, though.