AldoKrfc 106 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Caught the end of sportscene there n i'm sure I just heard him say that stokes dive was a penalty. Also that the ref had a great game apart from the penalty he gave, how the fuck can he have a good game when he gives a penalty (for nothing) that could have won them the league.The media are so scared of lennon its unreal, despise the cunts ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escobar 13,676 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 He is a fucking wanker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Hes a fukin spunkbubble Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,757 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Never a penalty. The more I see it the worse it gets. The thing is the referee is staring right at it. Amazing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andyy53 26 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Well hes a clown then. Even from a nuetral point of view, I don't know how anyone can say that was a penalty and that the ref had a good game Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndBoydScores 8 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 I might have to put my tin hat on here, but I thought that the the ref had a good game today. kept his cards in his pocket early on and tried to let the game flow [if thats at all possible in an OF game], at the Penalty at first I thought it was a penalty it was only with the benefit of the TV replay that I saw it was a dive so I could understand why he gave it, didn't like it but could understand it.To often we criticize referee's and often justified but today I thought he had a good game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broxi 11,595 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 I might have to put my tin hat on here, but I thought that the the ref had a good game today. kept his cards in his pocket early on and tried to let the game flow [if thats at all possible in an OF game], at the Penalty at first I thought it was a penalty it was only with the benefit of the TV replay that I saw it was a dive so I could understand why he gave it, didn't like it but could understand it.To often we criticize referee's and often justified but today I thought he had a good game.i agree, apart from the pen he had a good game. It was a big decision but hey-ho, they didnt score it anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluegecko 306 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 the only thing he said tonight I agree with was that Lennon's actions at the end were out of order.He's still a dick though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AldoKrfc 106 Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 If he doesn't give the ledley pen, then he can't give the stokes pen as the two are basically the same. Craig Thomson is a complete prick who could have ruined our season. No consistancy what so ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,446 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 PATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTHe's a wee dick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,622 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 i agree, apart from the pen he had a good game. It was a big decision but hey-ho, they didnt score it anywayHe was utter shit i can see why the filth picked for the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Tbh, when stokes went down for the second time I thought the referee was going to give it. It was more of a penalty than the Davis 'foul'.In saying that, neither were penalties as for that ledley, he ran into Whittaker.Same ref, same contact, same decision. Jelavic cup final springs to mind. no penalty, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DamienM855 413 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Caught the end of sportscene there n i'm sure I just heard him say that stokes dive was a penalty. Also that the ref had a great game apart from the penalty he gave, how the fuck can he have a good game when he gives a penalty (for nothing) that could have won them the league.The media are so scared of lennon its unreal, despise the cunts ! Honest question, did Nevin actually say both of those things?If so, just shows his intelligence level, the tosser. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Tbh, when stokes went down for the second time I thought the referee was going to give it. It was more of a penalty than the Davis 'foul'.In saying that, neither were penalties as for that ledley, he ran into Whittaker.That comment is word perfect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AldoKrfc 106 Posted April 24, 2011 Author Share Posted April 24, 2011 Honest question, did Nevin actually say both of those things?If so, just shows his intelligence level, the tosser.I'm pretty sure he said both, although i couldn't believe what i was hearing when he said the stokes dive was a pen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 A slimy wee cunt.Someone should teach him how to speak without mumbling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluegecko 306 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 I'm pretty sure he said both, although i couldn't believe what i was hearing when he said the stokes dive was a pen.He said there was knee to knee contact so in his book a pen, the fact that wee scrote was already on his way down was lost on him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterC 12,384 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 sniff sniff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 He said there was knee to knee contact so in his book a pen, the fact that wee scrote was already on his way down was lost on himWhat is his stand on foot to knee contact?As in Thomas Rogne vs. Nikica Jelavic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,694 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 SWS's interviews after the game sum up everything for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peat1873 8 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Pats a wank Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluegecko 306 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 What is his stand on foot to knee contact?As in Thomas Rogne vs. Nikica Jelavicprobably done an arsen "I did not see it" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
markybear 136 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Tbh, when stokes went down for the second time I thought the referee was going to give it. It was more of a penalty than the Davis 'foul'.In saying that, neither were penalties as for that ledley, he ran into Whittaker.The rules stateObstruction inside the penalty area is an indirect free kick. The 1st stokes claim and the Lesley claim IMO would be classed as obstruction (if u call purposely running straight into someone who can't get out the way obstruction, but that arguments for another day)Therefore both should've have been indirect free kicks from the spot where the "obstruction" took place. I hope someone in the media points this out to Lennon as he felt they should've had 3 pens . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
waltzer83 27 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Just for the record usual penalty tarrier pish but why the fuck am a being told a have 74 more approved posts like a have some sort of warning can somebody enlighten me? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rab_Rangers 38 Posted April 24, 2011 Share Posted April 24, 2011 Just for the record usual penalty tarrier pish but why the fuck am a being told a have 74 more approved posts like a have some sort of warning can somebody enlighten me?It's like that up til you have 100 posts by the looks of things, I've got that aswell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts