Walter Smith - Non-Executive Chairman Confirmed by LSE

[The Dude 20,026]

Buzz you are another one that appeared from nowhere to stir the shit..............and you are well...........let me be polite............a silly fool to think that Watty is a good choice after his less than shite input when the Club was in trouble.............bad judgement re his choice of group he acted as spokesman for, a stupid bid when the Club was free of debts.........really Buzz sticks out like a sore thumb as to why you reappeared. And why little boy fury has been on here a lot more than he has been for months.

Two things.

He backed the wrong horse during the takeover. Fair point. As did many. Plenty thought Whyte was great. They were wrong. Plenty thought Green was the messiah, turns out they were wrong too. It is beyond dispute that Smith has the best interests of the club at heart.

Secondly. your signature is wrong. thats not where the term bigot came from.

[WeDontDoWalkingAway1872 303]

Don't read to much into working without a contract.

Why is it when I come into any thread, no matter what the subject is you know everything about it?

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

You literally have no advantage. You do amuse me though.

I take that as a rather slimy remark.............as i have heard you laugh at what amuses you peaceful or do you need reminding once more.

[thehost 11,061]

Same place they always have been. You're having a bad day aren't you?

I'm not receiving email instructions. Nor am I popping round boards to try and wind up fans like a gleeful prick, if that's what you mean.

[Right_To_Censor 1,951]

confused

[sergio 1,199]

There is no pleasing some folk, Walter hasn't been perfect, but if the CG consortium had put him in as Chairman at the outset, we would have sold 40K + season tickets last term. So what has changed, nothing for me, I still trust him to do what is best for Rangers, but I know a lot of people will think differently, based on what though ? all on the back of a couple of leaked press reports,some bloggers talking piss for their own gain and the Twitteratti brigade on both sides of the divide.

It's laughable that some people are taking the word of the press as gospel, but the Scottish press, after what the pricks have put us through the past year or so, well that's just incredibly sad.

Walter has not spoken a word from his position, everything that has been said is pure speculation and hearsay, yet some on here have him as a rotten apple based on that, would be nice if people would just wait until he actually releases a statement and then judge what he has to say...

[Big Al 55 9,253]

Non Exec

reall Big Al come on it's not the title but the man you uses the title for his own ends .

Ni Enligsh

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

Two things.

He backed the wrong horse during the takeover. Fair point. As did many. Plenty thought Whyte was great. They were wrong. Plenty thought Green was the messiah, turns out they were wrong too. It is beyond dispute that Smith has the best interests of the club at heart.

Secondly. your signature is wrong. thats not where the term bigot came from.

Take it up with the guy it's accredited to......sure he can be reached on the other side.

[Fury 256]

I'm not receiving email instructions. Nor am I popping round boards to try and wind up fans like a gleeful prick, if that's what you mean.

I'll take that as a yes.

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

Why is it when I come into any thread, no matter what the subject is you know everything about it?

Ni Enligsh

yip but can he shift yes he can.

[The Dude 20,026]

Take it up with the guy it's accredited to......sure he can be reached on the other side.

Does he have it as his signature on a forum too? which one? KDS? Muddleboard? You did say he's on the other side.

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

I'll take that as a yes.

Can you clear up the distasteful laughing at that comment on CRO that caused you to wet yourself

[Guest]

What does the day to day tasks of a Non-Exec Chairman involve? How will his role be different?

[Fury 256]

I'm not receiving email instructions. Nor am I popping round boards to try and wind up fans like a gleeful prick, if that's what you mean.

I think it says a lot about you that you're lashing out at fans who are genuinely pleased at Walter becoming chairman. When you go to Ibrox, if you go, do you sit and tell those around you how much you hate Walter? What kind of reaction do you get?

[thehost 11,061]

Can you clear up the distasteful laughing at that comment on CRO that caused you to wet yourself

He will have to get his master's consent. Woof, Woof indeed!

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

Why is it when I come into any thread, no matter what the subject is you know everything about it?

Thank you for the compliment, but have to say I only know what I post in reply to.......perhaps it's an age thing and my business backgorund that makes you look beyond the words and to the make up of the person who is typing/saying them.

Cheers once again.

[The Dude 20,026]

What does the day to day tasks of a Non-Exec Chairman involve? How will his role be different?

Wasn't McLelland Non Exec Chairman?

[Fury 256]

He will have to get his master's consent. Woof, Woof indeed!

Haha! Who is my master? Go on, just for a laugh.

[Big Al 55 9,253]

What does the day to day tasks of a Non-Exec Chairman involve? How will his role be different?

He has powers rivalling Kim Jong Un apparently

[Super1690 17]

Just heard the news perfect appointment now going to have a read at the previous posts

[thehost 11,061]

I think it says a lot about you that you're lashing out at fans who are genuinely pleased at Walter becoming chairman. When you go to Ibrox, if you go, do you sit and tell those around you how much you hate Walter? What kind of reaction do you get?

I hate no one. I am on record, on many occasions as having nothing but the upmost respect for the gentleman that is Walter Smith. When it comes to the future direction of Rangers I feel he encapsulates all the very traits that led us to this dark place ergo I do not want him involved in the making of any decisions. Unlike you, and your pals, I regard my view as nothing more than a disagreement amongst like minded parties who all want the best thing for the club. Coming on here with the only intention of "getting it right up" fellow rangers fans is, in my view, somewhat poor. As to Ibrox attendance I sit in the same part walter has his personal ones. Hope that clarifies things for you.

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

I think it says a lot about you that you're lashing out at fans who are genuinely pleased at Walter becoming chairman. When you go to Ibrox, if you go, do you sit and tell those around you how much you hate Walter? What kind of reaction do you get?

I think it says a lot about you that you're lashing out at fans who are genuinely pleased at Walter becoming chairman. When you go to Ibrox, if you go, do you sit and tell those around you how much you hate Walter? What kind of reaction do you get?

This coming from the man that lashes out and call Rangers fans wankers.tims, idiots and well you know the rest fury.........for someone who is on the public gaze , you really fuck up big time when you go calling people things.

You need to think about your previous actions about calling fans names who are genuinely happy (yip) to disagree with you and your rst friends and certain threads and posts they make.

You can't have it both ways.

[Edmiston Drive 3,846]

Does he have it as his signature on a forum too? which one? KDS? Muddleboard? You did say he's on the other side.

omg you really have to try harder bud....you have no chance to score points with that crap.............

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

Petty playground behaviour by numerous posters in this thread is seriously tedious. Not for the first time it is ruining a thread. on fairly significant day in what has been a good week for bears, all we seem to get is posters bitching at each other, not debating the points at hand.

Seriously, I hear less drivel from my 3 year old.

[Buzz 306]

Thank you for the compliment, but have to say I only know what I post in reply to.......perhaps it's an age thing and my business backgorund that makes you look beyond the words and to the make up of the person who is typing/saying them.

Cheers once again.

Your business background :lol:

Fuck off back up your own arse mate. I don't need a business background to know that anything you say is twisted to your own wee bitter agenda.