Why not advertise for new Manager

[Alec87 331]

Instead of targeting someone, why don't we advertise the post and see who comes forward. I reckon there could be some very decent candidates.

[AlCapone 7,678]

Instead of targeting someone, why don't we advertise the post and see who comes forward. I reckon there could be some very decent candidates.

We don't need to advertise, every person who's inrerested will have contacted the Rangers board via their agents within the last month.

[Alec87 331]

We don't need to advertise, every person who's inrerested will have contacted the Rangers board via their agents within the last month.

But no one knew when he was leaving, until today.

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,242]

But no one knew when he was leaving, until today.

Even a blind man could see Ally was on his way oot.

[hammer93 15,137]

It would maybe be a break from the norm, where would it leave us if their wasn't a big level

of interest due to the boardroom shambles?

[Broxi 11,713]

Top story on SSN is decent advertising, free as well.

As mentioned, people will get in contact via agents if they are looking for the job.

[gmcf 34,707]

I agree.

Though , apparently , Davies is a done deal.

[Reformation Bear 6,453]

I don't think DL is the type of CEO that would go out on a financial limb and advertise until he knew what was affordable. Adding expense when he is on a campaign to reduce costs would - I think - not be a natural risk for him to take. When the certainty of finance is there then and only then might he consider appointing from outside the Club. Besides which if the Board mindset is moving to recognise a real risk that promotion might not be gained this season (certainly winning the Championship is a cause that is all but lost barring a remarkable reverse of fortunes), then a permanent managerial appointment would wait until there is certainty of promotion or not.

[dummiesoot 16,119]

I agree.

Though , apparently , Davies is a done deal.

Hope not, arrogant wee cunt of a man.

[Parlaneloyal 353]

The trouble is we can't afford a new manager as we're still paying Ally.

Hence the reason we've got McDowall

[Jack The Flipper 5,936]

The trouble is we can't afford a new manager as we're still paying Ally.

Hence the reason we've got McDowall

Exactly

[Ger77 742]

We cant afford to appoint a new Manager?, can we afford not to?

When we dont get promoted we will have many asking why we gave McDowall until the end of the season instead of getting a proper Manager in.

[STEPPS BOY 75,120]

The trouble is we can't afford a new manager as we're still paying Ally.

Hence the reason we've got McDowall

Unless a manager works for free until we reach SPL..

[Ibroxholm 2,291]

We cant afford to appoint a new Manager?, can we afford not to?

When we dont get promoted we will have many asking why we gave McDowall until the end of the season instead of getting a proper Manager in.

Let's give the man a chance to prove himself.

[JograBear 1,074]

Ally is taking big bucks. We cannot afford a new manager

[AlCapone 7,678]

But no one knew when he was leaving, until today.

You must still believe in Santa! Think that stops the touting?

[AlCapone 7,678]

The trouble is we can't afford a new manager as we're still paying Ally.

Hence the reason we've got McDowall

Nonsense, we will have a new manager in place by the end of the January transfer window

[Sweetheart 8,458]

i'd like Rangers to take their time choosing a manager. I'd hate for us to have a succession of managers in and out. I quite like this guy:-

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/luciano-spalletti/profil/trainer/517

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luciano_Spalletti

[Alec87 331]

But no one knew when he was leaving, until today.

Even a blind man could see Ally was on his way oot.

You must still believe in Santa! Think that stops the touting?

I said when he was leaving.

[AlCapone 7,678]

I said when he was leaving.

I think the point is you don't need to know an exact date to start your planning, the board will have been strategic over this and will already have irons in the fire

[Moody Blue 9,551]

I think the point is you don't need to know an exact date to start your planning, the board will have been strategic over this and will already have irons in the fire

Spot on, though keeping him in the dugout for yesterday was strange. I'd have had McDowall in charge against the bottom team, rather than have McCoist in charge and then have a 'new man' going to a team that's played us off the park twice this season.

I'd be gobsmacked if McDowall is indeed in charge for the rest of the season and McCoist serves out his full12months on gardening leave.

[AlCapone 7,678]

Spot on, though keeping him in the dugout for yesterday was strange. I'd have had McDowall in charge against the bottom team, rather than have McCoist in charge and then have a 'new man' going to a team that's played us off the park twice this season.

I'd be gobsmacked if McDowall is indeed in charge for the rest of the season and McCoist serves out his full12months on gardening leave.

No chance of McDowell being there long, there will be a clear out once a new manager is in place. One of The biggest criticsm the board have of McCoist was his loyalty to king.... They won't trust anyone who has ties with McCoist. The board now have all the aces with McCoists severance deal and he will be clever enough to realise he will have to take a vastly reduced pay off

[Coop 654]

I guess it's because we're not financially stable at the moment and wont be for the foreseeable future. That kind of situation isn't going to make it easy to convince someone to leave a job to come to us. The story should hopefully be better by the summer.

[siddiqi_drinker 14,635]

Even a blind man could see Ally was on his way oot.

None so blind a those who won't see. I suspect the new CEO already has candidates lined up for interviews or in fact may already be holding exploratory talks.

[6superbarry6 14,266]

I'll be amazed if it's not McCall he's a cert not that I want him but he'll steady the ship at least