GrandSuckMaster 1,775 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 21 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said: Lol so much crap in one post - during that same era Rangers fans were the mainstay of the Scottish support and proud of it! We were not 'saved' nor propped up by 'loyalists and unionists' but by loyal fans - yes some may have gone though a sense of duty - but duty as fans not duty as loyalists or unionists or Protestants but as supporters. It was the same last season it was Real supporters that kept going - no boycotting - no excuses about the style of football - supporters still went through their love of Eangers nothing more. Rangers fans should feel more secure about their support for Rangers - being a fan is enough - why do some needs 'extras' to love the club? I love Eangers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrandSuckMaster 1,775 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 45 minutes ago, Tipster said: You have no issues with a newspaper lying about Rangers? You don't want certain Bears to exist? You hate Unionists and Loyalists? You have spent the entire night on a thread attacking Rangers fans? I would hazard a guess you're a Bheastie my old son. 1. never said that 2. never said that 3. never said that 4. never done that 5.wrong good post Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipster 103 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 13 minutes ago, GrandSuckMaster said: 1. never said that 2. never said that 3. never said that 4. never done that 5.wrong good post You said you would rather the Vanguardbears never existed. Not sure if it is a lack of sleep because you have been on this subject all night or if you're just not the full shilling? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 21 minutes ago, GrandSuckMaster said: I love Eangers My second team! ( shuffles off to correct typo before the grammar nazis sharpen their pitchforks) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,714 Posted April 2, 2016 Author Share Posted April 2, 2016 This place is full of Eoasters ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 11 minutes ago, BLUEDIGNITY said: This place is full of Eoasters ! We agree! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,714 Posted April 2, 2016 Author Share Posted April 2, 2016 4 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said: We agree! Couldnae resist it, thanks for the feed ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 8 hours ago, GrandSuckMaster said: shameful for a writer to not understand how a conjunction works: "whose aims are to ensure that the good standing and unionist tradition of THE quintessential British Club is maintained, and to support the Protestant Unionist Loyalist community in Scotland, Ulster and beyond" It would be a conjunction if it were referring to the same subject matter, in this case it is used used to illustrate the groups wider aims. One aim refers to the club the other to the PUL community in Scotland & beyond. But I suspect you already knew that - which qualifies it as "shameful." Will you be demanding the resignations of the Rev Stuart McQuarrie & Brian Donohoe from the RF Board given that they both have pursuits and occupations which are respectively religious and poltiical ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,714 Posted April 2, 2016 Author Share Posted April 2, 2016 Don't see our 'balanced mhedia' exposing this ! https://footballtaxhavens.wordpress.com/2016/04/02/celtic-are-the-clinton-foundations-stooge-to-front-opening-of-football-ground-and-hide-their-dodgy-haitian-deals/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.A.I 36,183 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 3 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said: Lol so much crap in one post - during that same era Rangers fans were the mainstay of the Scottish support and proud of it! We were not 'saved' nor propped up by 'loyalists and unionists' but by loyal fans - yes some may have gone though a sense of duty - but duty as fans not duty as loyalists or unionists or Protestants but as supporters. It was the same last season it was Real supporters that kept going - no boycotting - no excuses about the style of football - supporters still went through their love of Rangers nothing more. Rangers fans should feel more secure about their support for Rangers - being a fan is enough - why do some needs 'extras' to love the club? Took you a while but eventually you got here why don't you ever allow others to support the club whatever way they want? Surely if thousands of English for example get into loving our club for a loyalist reason then that's a good thing? You once again are showing you bigoted tendencies Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,647 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 3 hours ago, Bluepeter9 said: Lol so much crap in one post - during that same era Rangers fans were the mainstay of the Scottish support and proud of it! We were not 'saved' nor propped up by 'loyalists and unionists' but by loyal fans - yes some may have gone though a sense of duty - but duty as fans not duty as loyalists or unionists or Protestants but as supporters. It was the same last season it was Real supporters that kept going - no boycotting - no excuses about the style of football - supporters still went through their love of Rangers nothing more. Rangers fans should feel more secure about their support for Rangers - being a fan is enough - why do some needs 'extras' to love the club? So there was no loyalist connection back then , the majority of songs sung were not about religion , the Hampden riot was based purely on football , supporters buses didn't play orange tunes , the press didn't have a field day going on about religion when talking about Rangers ? I must have got it all wrong back then travelling home and away to nearly every game throughout the early 80's Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 35 minutes ago, K.A.I said: Took you a while but eventually you got here why don't you ever allow others to support the club whatever way they want? Surely if thousands of English for example get into loving our club for a loyalist reason then that's a good thing? You once again are showing you bigoted tendencies Why don't you allow other to support Rangers the way we want? Is your love for Rangers so weak that you need to prop it up with add -ons? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
murzo 7,449 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 1 minute ago, Bluepeter9 said: Why don't you allow others Why don't you allow other to support Rangers the way we want? Is your love for Rangers so weak that you need to prop it up with add -ons? Think his love of Rangers is probably enhanced because of it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 9 minutes ago, gmcf said: So there was no loyalist connection back then , the majority of songs sung were not about religion , the Hampden riot was based purely on football , supporters buses didn't play orange tunes , the press didn't have a field day going on about religion when talking about Rangers ? I must have got it all wrong back then travelling home and away to nearly every game throughout the early 80's It was all plastic!!! 90 min bigot shite plus the odd nutters that equate football with some sort of rules for living. I note everyone quickly forgets how much Rangers supporters loved the Scotland team as well! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
murzo 7,449 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 6 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said: It was all plastic!!! 90 min bigot shite plus the odd nutters that equate football with some sort of rules for living. I note everyone quickly forgets how much Rangers supporters loved the Scotland team as well! Who's forgotten? The more important question should be why they stopped supporting? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,647 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 9 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said: It was all plastic!!! 90 min bigot shite plus the odd nutters that equate football with some sort of rules for living. I note everyone quickly forgets how much Rangers supporters loved the Scotland team as well! We'll leave at that then . As for your second point , I agree . Some of us still do . May not go and watch them anymore , but I always want to see them succeed . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,195 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 12 minutes ago, gmcf said: So there was no loyalist connection back then , the majority of songs sung were not about religion , the Hampden riot was based purely on football , supporters buses didn't play orange tunes , the press didn't have a field day going on about religion when talking about Rangers ? I must have got it all wrong back then travelling home and away to nearly every game throughout the early 80's Not totally disagreeing with the points you made but original point was, the reason why Rangers fans stuck by our club during the early eighties and in more recent times, for me it would have been for the same reasons that fans of other clubs stand by their team in times of trouble. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChesterPerry 472 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 Fuck the Scotland team!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 1 hour ago, D'Artagnan said: It would be a conjunction if it were referring to the same subject matter, in this case it is used used to illustrate the groups wider aims. One aim refers to the club the other to the PUL community in Scotland & beyond. But I suspect you already knew that - which qualifies it as "shameful." Will you be demanding the resignations of the Rev Stuart McQuarrie & Brian Donohoe from the RF Board given that they both have pursuits and occupations which are respectively religious and poltiical ? Brian Donohoe being involved is another good reason for not being involved. Labour party AND trade unionist. Probably a republican as well. Get him to fuck. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,647 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 8 minutes ago, Real Ranger said: Not totally disagreeing with the points you made but original point was, the reason why Rangers fans stuck by our club during the early eighties and in more recent times, for me it would have been for the same reasons that fans of other clubs stand by their team in times of trouble. Yes and I agree with you . I'm just saying that there was quite a big loyalist connection back , then more so than today . I'm not saying everyone that went to see Rangers had to be a loyalist but the overtones were certainly there . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwordandShield 189 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 29 minutes ago, Corky True Legend said: Brian Donohoe being involved is another good reason for not being involved. Labour party AND trade unionist. Probably a republican as well. Get him to fuck. Donohoe was the secretary of the Westminster Rangers Supporters club. He also called for an inquiry into HMRC's pursuit of us. I'm assuming he's a shareholder as well as I seen him at the shareholders meeting in 2014. I'm no fan of the man (he was my local MP) but he's definitely a Rangers man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 Just now, SwordandShield said: Donohoe was the secretary of the Westminster Rangers Supporters club. He also called for an inquiry into HMRC's pursuit of us. I'm assuming he's a shareholder as well as I seen him at the shareholders meeting in 2014. I'm no fan of the man (he was my local MP) but he's definitely a Rangers man. Not doubting his Rangers' credentials, just detest his political background. However, he is better (slightly) than my MP, a certain Mr A Salmond. I wrote some time ago, when he was First Minister, to him, Malcolm Bruce (the MP at that time) and Hilary Benn, due to his position at Westminster (I cant remember what it was) regarding the criminalisation of football fans. Bruce actually replied, although he agreed with the legislation (so much for liberal values), Benn's office replied saying he would respond after the General Election - but his party got booted out so that fizzled out; from Salmond - not a dickie bird. I wouldn't trust any mainline politician as far as I could throw them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwordandShield 189 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 1 minute ago, Corky True Legend said: Not doubting his Rangers' credentials, just detest his political background. However, he is better (slightly) than my MP, a certain Mr A Salmond. I wrote some time ago, when he was First Minister, to him, Malcolm Bruce (the MP at that time) and Hilary Benn, due to his position at Westminster (I cant remember what it was) regarding the criminalisation of football fans. Bruce actually replied, although he agreed with the legislation (so much for liberal values), Benn's office replied saying he would respond after the General Election - but his party got booted out so that fizzled out; from Salmond - not a dickie bird. I wouldn't trust any mainline politician as far as I could throw them. Yeah I wasn't a fan of Donohoe's politics but I'd rather him than the SNP boot we have now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 72,135 Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 1 hour ago, Bluepeter9 said: It was all plastic!!! 90 min bigot shite plus the odd nutters that equate football with some sort of rules for living. I note everyone quickly forgets how much Rangers supporters loved the Scotland team as well! Don't think everybody forgets, they just don't like them anymore. Everything about the national team has changed for the worst. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,714 Posted April 2, 2016 Author Share Posted April 2, 2016 The Rangers are inextricably linked to Protestantism and the Union always were and always will be that's one of the reasons they tried to kill us and are still trying by the way and no amount of handwringing by apologists will change it ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.