Jimfanciesthedude 24,572 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 17 hours ago, BridgeIsBlue said: We committed three more fouls and received three more cards. Gollum was always sending one of our players off after his horror show on Wednesday. What horror show, cunt did as he was told on wed night, cheating tarrier cunt he is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 18 minutes ago, Dan Deacon said: The size of his fucking head Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Deacon 55,431 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Jack The Flipper said: The size of his fucking head Oj head is large needed to cover it ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Dan Deacon said: Oj head is large needed to cover it ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,572 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 3 hours ago, loyalfollower said: Looks like I’m in the minority here but although it’s a 50/50 there to be won his studs regardless of the argument are up over that strikers ankle. Abit reckless tbf and I don’t think we’ll win an appeal on that. If that challenge happened on our player then we’d expect a red to be shown to the opposition. However I don’t think there’s any intent on jacks behalf as you can see he’s focused on where the ball is going next and not one look at at the other player Yes we'd expect a red but a number of times this season our players have been on the end of the same or worse, and no red card, all we ask is fairness and consistency, shinnie shoulf be jailed for his tackle on tav if jacks is a worthy red Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakbear 3,586 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 3 hours ago, loyalfollower said: Looks like I’m in the minority here but although it’s a 50/50 there to be won his studs regardless of the argument are up over that strikers ankle. Abit reckless tbf and I don’t think we’ll win an appeal on that. If that challenge happened on our player then we’d expect a red to be shown to the opposition. However I don’t think there’s any intent on jacks behalf as you can see he’s focused on where the ball is going next and not one look at at the other player Looks like you are in the minority. May is nowhere near the ball so not a 50/50. The studs are above the players ankle because his ankle is on the ground and jack just made a pass that involved his foot to be off the ground. The studs also happen to be pointing at the ground. Look at the line of his eyes throughout the incident. He is 100% focussed on the ball. Absolutely no intent. Absolutely not reckless. Not a lunge. Not off his standing leg. Not uncontrolled. Just a determined focus on making a pass. Has to be rescinded although given this would be the third time I guess the FA might feel they need to back their refs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Has anyone got the rule book out with this one and come up with a defining reason as to why it is or isn’t a red card? I can’t see how jack could have done anything differently but as others have said it does look bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,608 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 30 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said: If we appeal and this gets rescinded again then surely we have to contact the relevant authorities as it would appear Jack has now been tarnished with a very clear and unfair reputation. To possibly have 3, 75% of your red cards rescinded is completely unheard of. It's nothing short of disgraceful and he should receive, at the very least a personal and public apology. I don't think Jack is a dirty player. Possibly a tad naive and silly at times but he just seems as honest as the day is long. He is clearly being treated differently to everyone else. The club should also make our view public even to make the officials think twice about booking Jack in the future. If there is any doubt a ref should never send anyone off. Or we could force the referee's to go on strike. That'd be a first... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryju84 3,170 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 6 minutes ago, Jack The Flipper said: Has anyone got the rule book out with this one and come up with a defining reason as to why it is or isn’t a red card? I can’t see how jack could have done anything differently but as others have said it does look bad. I think someone posted the rules a few pages back. (But I was pished yesterday so Im not 100% sure). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougie76 15,359 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Or we could force the referee's to go on strike. That'd be a first... That's what pisses me off, they have had it easy from refs ever since and not a fucking peep from the media about it, fucking disgusting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueVanguard 6,677 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 RYANS JACKSSS A FUCKING PROTESTANT! NA NA NA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 9 minutes ago, Ryju84 said: I think someone posted the rules a few pages back. (But I was pished yesterday so Im not 100% sure). Same Cheers for the heads up I’ll have a wee look Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,603 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 The only reason he got the red is due to May's reaction imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 We're appealing it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds_Bear 8,110 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 1 minute ago, gogzy said: We're appealing it. Good, I don't think we'll win it though. They have to save face. No way they will allow it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp9 753 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Laudrup1984 said: If we appeal and this gets rescinded again then surely we have to contact the relevant authorities as it would appear Jack has now been tarnished with a very clear and unfair reputation. To possibly have 3, 75% of your red cards rescinded is completely unheard of. It's nothing short of disgraceful and he should receive, at the very least a personal and public apology. I don't think Jack is a dirty player. Possibly a tad naive and silly at times but he just seems as honest as the day is long. He is clearly being treated differently to everyone else. The club should also make our view public even to make the officials think twice about booking Jack in the future. If there is any doubt a ref should never send anyone off. Because of this it will 100% be upheld. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_1 1,136 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Three game ban if we appeal and fail. With Dorrans out I don't think we should risk having him missing for three games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,603 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 24 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said: He got booked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange and Blue 1,173 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 Shinnie should've walked 2 or 3 fucking yellow incidents! The one at the end of the first half when gollam blew for half time with no added time on. Shocking officials in this country. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEFTONG 60,190 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 6 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said: Dermot the bead rattler.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 8 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said: He got booked. Yeah I thought he did too. It was far more reckless though IMO. He also had some other hefty challenges yesterday and on Wednesday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyrshireBlue 449 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 21 hours ago, Rangers_no1 said: Boyd and Commons have both played at a higher level than every single person on here combined and believe he could have avoided the follow through. But what do they know? cunts playing 8 a sides down Suiterhouse on a midweek night have better experience than those two on such an incident... I can confirm that they haven't.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roboscot 1,176 Posted December 4, 2017 Share Posted December 4, 2017 17 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said: The midfielder was sent off for a challenge on Stevie May early in the second half of Rangers’ 2-1 win over Aberdeen. And so the lie will be told. How has it become a “challenge” when Jack was in possession and played the ball away before May got close enough to him to even get a sniff? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.