The Curse of Daniel Candeias

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

Was never a 2nd yellow, or a stamp. He's clearly off balance himself and tries to avoid the boy when puting his foot down. The wee snipered cunt makes that impossible with his rolling around.

His first one he continues running and the boy makes contact with him. Again rolls around and gets DC a booking.

I'll be honest, a lot of fouls for tugs, trips etc at the game I was raging at, but watched game again last and they were fouls. It was the big ones the ref got wrong, aided and abetted by two utterly incompetent officials at the Broomie/ SJ side.

The above two were wrong. Foul on Tav ignored on run up to incident. Flanagan's looked wrong though TV angles inconclusive. At the game it looked more of the same theatrics with no contact. Their player deserved a 2nd yellow for blatant body check on Flanagan.

Definitely a sway towards the opponents, little given in our favour at all.

 

[plumbGER 24,518]

The first yellow wasn't merited either, it wasn't any worse than some of the fouls they had down that side in the first half, I think he only booked him because he had just booked their player a few minutes before.

[Gman36 3,455]

That picture shows he trod on him. The video confirms no deliberate stamp and that it was fully accidental. 

Is it me or did the ref maybe forget he'd booked candeias, then when he realised he did shat it because he knew he'd need to send him off? I think that's maybe what happened. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

1 minute ago, Gman36 said:

That picture shows he trod on him. The video confirms no deliberate stamp and that it was fully accidental. 

Is it me or did the ref maybe forget he'd booked candeias, then when he realised he did shat it because he knew he'd need to send him off? I think that's maybe what happened. 

It looked like he was going to book Tav then chose not to. Imho he booked DC instead, thinking it was a insignificant booking for a player he didn't realise he'd already booked. Their players and tgat fud of a linesman were happy to remind him, fuck all he could do then.

Really wouldn't surprise me if he thought it was Tav on the yellow and given both Tav and DC were involved in the incident he chose to give Candeias the yellow.

[beararse 6,375]

16 minutes ago, Gman36 said:

That picture shows he trod on him. The video confirms no deliberate stamp and that it was fully accidental. 

Is it me or did the ref maybe forget he'd booked candeias, then when he realised he did shat it because he knew he'd need to send him off? I think that's maybe what happened. 

That is exactly what happened.

Had he been booked for stamping/violent conduct it would have been a straight red. Ref made a right cunt of it.

[Inigo 32,526]

Ralston in the DR slams Candeias for a 'senseless lunge'. Idiot.

[therightway 65]

1 hour ago, plumbGER said:

The first yellow wasn't merited either, it wasn't any worse than some of the fouls they had down that side in the first half, I think he only booked him because he had just booked their player a few minutes before.

 

I think the first one may have been for giving the lino a volley of abuse after being called for the foul.

[BlueKnight87 17,286]

Just seen a report he sent off Candeias for squaring up to Caseres not the tackle. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

2 minutes ago, Inigo said:

Ralston in the DR slams Candeias for a 'senseless lunge'. Idiot.

Of course.

Probably wrote that off someone else's match report and didn't even watch the game. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

1 minute ago, BlueKnight87 said:

Just seen a report he sent off Candeias for squaring up to Caseres not the tackle. 

Source?

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

3 minutes ago, therightway said:

 

I think the first one may have been for giving the lino a volley of abuse after being called for the foul.

Dissent and mistaken identity then.

The curse of Daniel Candeias right enough.

[Lloyd 10,756]

Coulibaly has said that the players all told the ref it was Tav who fouled him and not Candeias and the Ref told them “no it was Number 2” and he booked Candeias..even tho Candeias is number 21 and Tav is number 2.

[BlueKnight87 17,286]

1 minute ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Source?

The sun reporting it mate. 

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/3560206/Rangers-daniel-candeias-villarreal-santiago-caseres-reason-red-card/

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

Just now, Siwel said:

Coulibaly has said that the players all told the ref it was Tav who fouled him and not Candeias and the Ref told them “no it was Number 2” and he booked Candeias..even tho Candeias is number 21 and Tav is number 2.

It really looked like that at the time. Tav repeatedly insisted it was him.

[RoyalBlues 54]

Wouldn't have booked him if he realised he was already on a yellow

[rfc1990 1,140]

13 minutes ago, BlueKnight87 said:

Just seen a report he sent off Candeias for squaring up to Caseres not the tackle. 

Then why was the Villarreal player not booked as well? 🤨

[plumbGER 24,518]

15 minutes ago, therightway said:

 

I think the first one may have been for giving the lino a volley of abuse after being called for the foul.

Possibly mate, was at the other side of the ground from me but in line, was difficult to see the actual foul and I did see him having a go, think it was just frustration because they were getting off with murder down that side.

He was a big miss, without him pressing we couldn't really put their defence under too much pressure for any lengtg of tike, he was closing down his man and making that big donkey number 4 pick a different pass, usually poorly.

[plumbGER 24,518]

3 minutes ago, rfc1990 said:

Then why was the Villarreal player not booked as well? 🤨

Really? Fuck sake.

[Lloyd 10,756]

7 minutes ago, RoyalBlues said:

Wouldn't have booked him if he realised he was already on a yellow

It looked like that to me too think the ref realised he’d fucked it.

[philiprfc 1,799]

30 minutes ago, BlueKnight87 said:

The sun reporting it mate. 

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/3560206/Rangers-daniel-candeias-villarreal-santiago-caseres-reason-red-card/

 

 

The guys still on the floor as Candeias walks away and gets booked

Fucking nonsense man

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,137]

32 minutes ago, BlueKnight87 said:

The sun reporting it mate. 

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/3560206/Rangers-daniel-candeias-villarreal-santiago-caseres-reason-red-card/

If that report is true then the ref really did loose the plot, I never saw Candais squaring up with anyone.

Looked to me that the ref went over to the linesman for conformation and he possibly got it wrong as well.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723]

There's no squaring up, the ref clocks Tav then seems to crazily flash the card to the nearest other person in blue.

He's also saying number 2 which is either Tavs number, or DCs 2nd foul - which it can't be as at that time he didn't realise it and red card til he was told by others it was a 2nd yellow. Coulibally is right, he's saying no 2 then booked no 21.

Ref really has just fucked it.

[BlueKnight87 17,286]

3 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

There's no squaring up, the ref clocks Tav then seems to crazily flash the card to the nearest other person in blue.

He's also saying number 2 which is either Tavs number, or DCs 2nd foul - which it can't be as at that time he didn't realise it and red card til he was told by others it was a 2nd yellow. Coulibally is right, he's saying no 2 then booked no 21.

Ref really has just fucked it.

Ref had made a mess of this. Going with unsporting behaviour on his report if true, It is just him trying to justify his incompetence. 

[harlands plater 16,975]

46 minutes ago, Inigo said:

Ralston in the DR slams Candeias for a 'senseless lunge'. Idiot.

That’s my copy of The Gallant Pioneers going in the bin.

[Inigo 32,526]

The Sun also going with the image if Candeias trodding on the guy with 'Candeias stamped on Santiago Caceres' line.

What chance have you got.