The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, King Jela said: It's the club failing to control their player then. It was made crystal clear to them at the start of the season, Lennon saying so himself, 'training, home, games, home'. Similarily to how a club can be punished for failing to keep players disciplined on the park, clubs should be punished for failing to control their players off the park as well, under these unique circumstances. Controlling their players during a game for the club is totally different to knowing where they are at any given moment. If a player is given a couple of days off and told to stay home but decides to ignore that and go meet a wee dirty in spain, there's much less control over that from the club's perspective. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, bornabear said: The only thing missing is his rosary beads, mate I dont believe in sky fairies mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 This thread should just be deleted. It's going no where and celtic never fielded an ineligible player. End of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raging blue 1972 894 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 8 minutes ago, The Dude said: There was no 'mistake' on Legia's part. Player had a three match ban. They tried to game the system and got caught. Their chairman even moaned that celtic and the UEFA delegate were laughing at them before the game when they saw the suspended player's name on the teamsheet. what a load of shite 6-1 up with two minutes to go and they tried to game the system - sure also if they were laughing doubt he would have known what for at the time and only realised afterwards. if thats true the delegate was complicit and so were they - and you go on about sporting imtegrity - fck sake mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
British_Empire 9,648 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Redwhiteandblue said: This thread should just be deleted. It's going no where and celtic never fielded an ineligible player. End of. that's it settled then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, raging blue 1972 said: what a load of shite 6-1 up with two minutes to go and they tried to game the system - sure also if they were laughing doubt he would have known what for at the time and only realised afterwards. if thats true the delegate was complicit and so were they - and you go on about sporting imtegrity - fck sake mate No. By removing the player from their 25-man player list and replacing him with someone else while he served his suspension, they tried to game the system and it bit them on the arse. UEFA delegate wasn't complicit. Its down to the club to ensure the player is eligible to play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, British_Empire said: that's it settled then 😂😂😂😂😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
British_Empire 9,648 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: No. By removing the player from their 25-man player list and replacing him with someone else while he served his suspension, they tried to game the system and it bit them on the arse. UEFA delegate wasn't complicit. Its down to the club to ensure the player is eligible to play. Exactly Kilmarnock - 3-0 win Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger4life_1872 29,514 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, Redwhiteandblue said: This thread should just be deleted. It's going no where and celtic never fielded an ineligible player. End of. Stick fact at the end and admin will definitely delete it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said: Stick fact at the end and admin will definitely delete it Will do captain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, raging blue 1972 said: what a load of shite 6-1 up with two minutes to go and they tried to game the system - sure also if they were laughing doubt he would have known what for at the time and only realised afterwards. if thats true the delegate was complicit and so were they - and you go on about sporting imtegrity - fck sake mate What https://BOYCOTT THIS LINK/sport/football/football-news/celtic-knew-fielded-ineligible-player-10225115 A https://www.foxsports.com/stories/soccer/uefa-probes-legia-warsaw-over-ineligible-player-during-match-vs-celtic Load https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/news/0220-0e9074d0fcfb-d68c22c62022-1000--uefa-welcomes-cas-decision-on-legia/ Of https://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/aug/07/celtic-champions-league-reprieve-legia-warsaw-ineligible Shite https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/28701951 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornabear 6,202 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, British_Empire said: Exactly Kilmarnock - 3-0 win Isn't that called "check mate, " mate. " Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raging blue 1972 894 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: No. By removing the player from their 25-man player list and replacing him with someone else while he served his suspension, they tried to game the system and it bit them on the arse. UEFA delegate wasn't complicit. Its down to the club to ensure the player is eligible to play. pretty sure they thought he served the ban, but anyway if a delegate knows he is under obligation to inform the club. didnt one tell them before a match shortly afterwards - you are wrong. fk sake mate you'd cause an argument in an empty house lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
five stars 1,621 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 It seems straightforward, if you come back from Spain you have to quarantine for 14 days. They got the benefit of a player's participation in a game where he was not allowed to play under the rules. This is a disadvantage to Kilmarnock and they should be awarded a 3-0 victory. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, raging blue 1972 said: pretty sure they thought he served the ban, but anyway if a delegate knows he is under obligation to inform the club. didnt one tell them before a match shortly afterwards - you are wrong. fk sake mate you'd cause an argument in an empty house lol No they aren't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, British_Empire said: Exactly Kilmarnock - 3-0 win Except Bolingoli wasn't ineligible. 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Scenario A....Bolongoli comes back from Spain tells the truth and owns up, can’t play at Kilmarnock. Scenario B.....Bolongoli comes back from Spain , knows he can’t play at Kilmarnock and either lies or his club lies and plays in a game he shouldn’t be allowed to. The club should pay the price and the player should be hammered by the club after that. 3-0 to Kilmarnock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,361 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 9 minutes ago, The Dude said: Controlling their players during a game for the club is totally different to knowing where they are at any given moment. In the middle of a global pandemic when strict isolation laws apply? No sure about that one tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raging blue 1972 894 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: No they aren't. so its entirely up to the club to ensure all their players are eligible, no matter what? simple yes or no that's all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 5 minutes ago, British_Empire said: Exactly Kilmarnock - 3-0 win Boom 👍 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, raging blue 1972 said: so its entirely up to the club to ensure all their players are eligible, no matter what? simple yes or no that's all Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raging blue 1972 894 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, The Dude said: Except Bolingoli wasn't ineligible. 😂 if he had to quarantine and played then of course he is unless played via zoom lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, raging blue 1972 said: if he had to quarantine and played then of course he is unless played via zoom lol He's not. You can repeat it as many times as you want, it doesn't make it true. If he was ineligible, why no charge for fielding an ineligible player? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: He's not. You can repeat it as many times as you want, it doesn't make it true. If he was ineligible, why no charge for fielding an ineligible player? There should be Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, Dave Hedgehog said: There should be There's not though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.