RFC55 109,478 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 12 minutes ago, GOAT said: Lawrence I think, hands all over him. Stone wall penalty. We’d be screaming for that other way about. Going that way then the one on goldson was a stonewaller, was right in front of me in the second half AGM_72 and Soldier blue 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,698 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 31 minutes ago, Tiger Shaw said: No sure there’s any great conspiracy with refs meeting up to discuss ways to fuck us over that’s just stupid but think it’s clear as day that any of these tight calls that could go ether way the majority of time go against us, anybody denying that’s full of shite, the tramps across the city mostly get these decisions in their favour. The same tramps that arguably had 3 go against them in the cup defeat to killie? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Shaw 30,678 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 2 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said: The same tramps that arguably had 3 go against them in the cup defeat to killie? Never watched it but aye guessing the same tramps Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 14 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said: They didnt get a penalty for the exact same thing we had a goal chopped off of Aye they did. Exactly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 14 minutes ago, RFC55 said: Going that way then the one on goldson was a stonewaller, was right in front of me in the second half Would need to see it, I’ve only seen that video. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,478 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 6 minutes ago, GOAT said: Would need to see it, I’ve only seen that video. He’s being held and shirt pulled at one of the corners the blue plumber 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SeparateEntityMyArse 53,925 Posted September 17, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted September 17, 2023 17 minutes ago, RFC55 said: He’s being held and shirt pulled at one of the corners The 24th minute one where Sima breaks into the box the boy tugs his sleeve was a penalty too if minor infringements / contact are to be deemed fouls. Bears, Leighton loyal, kelvd1873 and 3 others 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,478 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 24 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: The 24th minute one where Sima breaks into the box the boy tugs his sleeve was a penalty too if minor infringements / contact are to be deemed fouls. Said at the time to my mate he should’ve went down SeparateEntityMyArse, cascadeshrimp and OhW 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,698 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 1 hour ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: The 24th minute one where Sima breaks into the box the boy tugs his sleeve was a penalty too if minor infringements / contact are to be deemed fouls. Thats a stonewaller, not even close Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,698 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 1 hour ago, GOAT said: Aye they did. Exactly. No they didnt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Shaw 30,678 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 39 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said: No they didnt Regardless if they did or didn’t it’s an an absolute fact that overall they get more decision in their favour than against. while we mostly get decisions against, we’re rarely giving the benefit of the doubt. Why that is I’ve no idea, maybe we’re just genuinely unlucky or maybe it’s a consequence of being the most hated club and support in the country, officials just find it easier to rule against us than for, fuck knows but whatever the reason it’s frustrating as fuck. kelvd1873 and SeparateEntityMyArse 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 29 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said: No they didnt Explain the didference. Player gets his foot in front of the others before he’s kicked. It’s a penalty and and fucking goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,925 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 32 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said: Thats a stonewaller, not even close Imo its certainly more of a foul than the Lawrence one yet has barely been mentioned. I think Walsh handled the game and incidents consistently. Treated it like a man's game and wasn't bothered with minimal contact type challenges. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 6 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Imo its certainly more of a foul than the Lawrence one yet has barely been mentioned. I think Walsh handled the game and incidents consistently. Treated it like a man's game and wasn't bothered with minimal contact type challenges. Show me a video of this. Because the still photo doesn’t look like more of a foul than the Lawrence one. Lawrence is a stone Waller and the only reason he’s got away with it is because the ball was going nowhere near them from the corner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,925 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, GOAT said: Show me a video of this. Because the still photo doesn’t look like more of a foul than the Lawrence one. Lawrence is a stone Waller and the only reason he’s got away with it is because the ball was going nowhere near them from the corner. 24 mins. Find your own fuckin video 🤣🤣🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boybluesy 3,758 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 Looked onside to me at the time and I'm not convinced by var ruling, suspect mickey mouse kit probably. RealWorldRich 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 See sometimes we’ve got a cheek to slag tarriers for being paranoid. It might be on side it might be offside fuck knows it’s a shite angle and we can’t tell. We were lucky not to concede a penalty. But that’s now what you should be talking about this weekend, it’s the fact the tarriers got a penalty for the exact same type of situation we were denied a goal in against them the other week. That’s the real issue this weekend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,790 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 2 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: The 24th minute one where Sima breaks into the box the boy tugs his sleeve was a penalty too if minor infringements / contact are to be deemed fouls. I don’t think he carried it on into the box tbh, that picture’s outside the box. If he carries it on into the box it’s a pen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
onlythestrongsurvive 1,007 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 4 hours ago, graeme_4 said: That’s not how VAR offside works 4 hours ago, The Dude said: Completely irrelevant. Every goal is checked as a matter of routine. ye i know that lol - drinking and ranting and all that lol. though point still stands if you are level you are on and to me that looked level Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,925 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 14 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said: I don’t think he carried it on into the box tbh, that picture’s outside the box. If he carries it on into the box it’s a pen He carries on in, ForeverAndEver 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 31,064 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 Just saw the celtic highlights. Not much difference between the Turnbull incident and the Dessers incident. Kyogo is online for his headed goal. Sima is online for Roofe's disallowed goal. Again, similar scenarios. Also, the linesman raised his flag immediately against Sima, put it down as the play continued, and then raised it again after the goal was scored. I thought they were instructed to delay raising their flag. The game is corrupt. Has been since the spfl was introduced. And Beale needs to take a stronger stance post-match to these decisions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,698 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 1 hour ago, Tiger Shaw said: Regardless if they did or didn’t it’s an an absolute fact that overall they get more decision in their favour than against. while we mostly get decisions against, we’re rarely giving the benefit of the doubt. Why that is I’ve no idea, maybe we’re just genuinely unlucky or maybe it’s a consequence of being the most hated club and support in the country, officials just find it easier to rule against us than for, fuck knows but whatever the reason it’s frustrating as fuck. Didnt we go two years or something without conceding a penalty in the league? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,790 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 1 minute ago, Jimbeamjunior said: Didnt we go two years or something without conceding a penalty in the league? We’ve no had a penalty against us since before last season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,698 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 1 hour ago, GOAT said: Explain the didference. Player gets his foot in front of the others before he’s kicked. It’s a penalty and and fucking goal. No its not, the disallowed goal thread perfectly explains it, but I'll do it here Tarrier defender had the ball, in an attempt to pass the ball (fannying about or not he was still in possession of the ball) dessers impedes his attempt to pass the ball, hence foul against dessers Yesterday tarrier penalty, a loose ball that no one had possession of, tarrier gets there first and its brought down, hence penalty Cantwell at home to servette, servette defender takes a bad touch and loses possession of the ball, in a vain attempt to get it back he lunges and catches cantwell from behind, penalty to us graeme_4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 26 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said: No its not, the disallowed goal thread perfectly explains it, but I'll do it here Tarrier defender had the ball, in an attempt to pass the ball (fannying about or not he was still in possession of the ball) dessers impedes his attempt to pass the ball, hence foul against dessers Yesterday tarrier penalty, a loose ball that no one had possession of, tarrier gets there first and its brought down, hence penalty Cantwell at home to servette, servette defender takes a bad touch and loses possession of the ball, in a vain attempt to get it back he lunges and catches cantwell from behind, penalty to us So you’re going against every referee that’s reviewed last weeks decision other than one ex Scottish referee? You’re talking absolute nonsense. Anyone that thinks the other weeks goal was a foul for them is a fucking idiot. SK Rfc 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts