BlueSuedeSambas 56,372 Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 4 minutes ago, Big Robert said: The 5 demand letter, please share Surely got to fix the typo FFS J-Maestro 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGM_72 4,055 Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 I'd love to get an answer from the board on how the Edmiston House project is shaping up. What lead them to believe we would make 1m a year with it? A project that ran 3x over budget and makes a pittance. It's now September and there's still no CEO, DoF or Head of Youth. We are an unserious football club cosplaying as a big club. HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadron Collider 32,331 Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 2 minutes ago, AGM_72 said: I'd love to get an answer from the board on how the Edmiston House project is shaping up. What lead them to believe it would make 1m a year with it? A project that ran 3x over budget and makes a pittance. It's now September and there's still no CEO, DoF or Head of Youth. We are an unserious football club cosplaying as a big club. Run by amateurs mate. Professionals required now. Make you fucking greet the state of our once great club. 😩 HG5 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 32,405 Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 6 minutes ago, AGM_72 said: I'd love to get an answer from the board on how the Edmiston House project is shaping up. What lead them to believe it would make 1m a year with it? A project that ran 3x over budget and makes a pittance. It's now September and there's still no CEO, DoF or Head of Youth. We are an unserious football club cosplaying as a big club. Good word. I'm using that somewhere today Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post The Godfather 75,661 Posted September 3 Popular Post Share Posted September 3 1 minute ago, bluenoz said: Good word. I'm using that somewhere today The bedroom? BlueKnight87, bluenoz, NI and 7 others 10 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacBoyd 6,067 Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 There's nothing wrong with edminston house it's an excellent facility and we all were saying the surrounds of ibrox needed a push forward. The boards fuck up is recruitment and managerial choices. BlueKnight87, Rendo74 and graeme_4 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenose48 974 Posted September 3 Share Posted September 3 Aw fur coat and nae knickers sums up this board. Ed House and a few thousand extra seats do nothing for the team on the park week in and week out. The money that has been spent on both these projects would have been better spent on players that can win games. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jelavic191 4,800 Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 5 hours ago, bluenose48 said: Aw fur coat and nae knickers sums up this board. Ed House and a few thousand extra seats do nothing for the team on the park week in and week out. The money that has been spent on both these projects would have been better spent on players that can win games. I’m not sure if it’s still the case with UEFAs new rules but I thought infrastructure investment could be offset against transfers/wages/revenue? So in a roundabout way it would let you spend more on the team that you would have been able to without the investment graeme_4 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NixonRFC 1,574 Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 8 hours ago, bluenose48 said: Aw fur coat and nae knickers sums up this board. Ed House and a few thousand extra seats do nothing for the team on the park week in and week out. The money that has been spent on both these projects would have been better spent on players that can win games. How many extra seats have we installed? I thought it was around 600. qwerty 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty 3,792 Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 Canny open it Big Rab, can you post it i. Here ma man please? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 25,571 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 On 04/09/2024 at 06:42, Jelavic191 said: I’m not sure if it’s still the case with UEFAs new rules but I thought infrastructure investment could be offset against transfers/wages/revenue? So in a roundabout way it would let you spend more on the team that you would have been able to without the investment It is, and whatever revenue ed house etc brings in means more can be spent on wages etc as a % for FFP All good people saying we need investment, but as we have seen down south you can't just have owners throwing money into a club now, it has to be generated someway Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 45,131 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 19 minutes ago, Jimfanciesthedude said: It is, and whatever revenue ed house etc brings in means more can be spent on wages etc as a % for FFP All good people saying we need investment, but as we have seen down south you can't just have owners throwing money into a club now, it has to be generated someway Aye there's a difference between that and investors not giving a penny over since 55. Revenue from NEH won't even scratch the surface. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 25,571 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 5 minutes ago, esquire8 said: Aye there's a difference between that and investors not giving a penny over since 55. Revenue from NEH won't even scratch the surface. And how would they give a penny, remember they gave around 5 billion pennies in gerrards 3 years Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nk89 1,436 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 Seen Danilo at Airport today, and his leg is in a brace again!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
East London Loyal 424 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 Quick question - Why doesn’t Rangers have a series of investors wanting to throw money in? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossS1873 2,600 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 1 minute ago, East London Loyal said: Quick question - Why doesn’t Rangers have a series of investors wanting to throw money in? Because Rangers isn't making money. It's not an attractive investment esquire8 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crmpicco 150 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 On 02/09/2024 at 18:35, Dickie1963 said: You can't sack the Board. And if you could who would replace them ? Be careful what you wish for. We have gone backwards since we reached Europa Cup Final of that there is no doubt. Morelos and Kent being allowed to leave for nothing was a disgrace. They should have been told sign a new contract or you won't play again. Any sort of boycott will damage the club and team and allow celtic to continue to dominate us. It might even put the financial future of the club at risk. We still have players we bought/acquired to come into the side. Rather than boycotts let's get behind the team 100% This is why we’ll stagnate for years Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 45,131 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 8 minutes ago, RossS1873 said: Because Rangers isn't making money. It's not an attractive investment Because those in charge have went from one fuck up to another. Don't blame anyone from not giving another penny. RossS1873 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossS1873 2,600 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 1 minute ago, esquire8 said: Because those in charge have went from one fuck up to another. Don't blame anyone from not giving another penny. There has been very little accountability for decisions made by people on that board. Wilson got a new job, Bisgrove got a new job, Robertson has vanished. The rest are still there Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 32,405 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 Apparently we played in a bounce game against Motherwell. 4-1 McKinnon, Lovelace, Balogun and Cortés Didn't know where to put this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
East London Loyal 424 Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 22 hours ago, RossS1873 said: Because Rangers isn't making money. It's not an attractive investment Most clubs don’t. That said, an investor with vision could change Rangers fortunes and become profitable. Is the future moving down south? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossS1873 2,600 Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 1 minute ago, East London Loyal said: Most clubs don’t. That said, an investor with vision could change Rangers fortunes and become profitable. Is the future moving down south? No. We aren't moving down south. Most clubs don't because they pay ridiculously high wages. celtic are profitable. They make large profits every year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
East London Loyal 424 Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 Just now, RossS1873 said: No. We aren't moving down south. Most clubs don't because they pay ridiculously high wages. celtic are profitable. They make large profits every year. Are know the club aren’t now, but to make serious money and become a challenger in a bigger pool, is it in the clubs interest to make the switch? The blocker is see is that the Turkey’s down south won’t vote for Christmas. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negri's lovechild 15,383 Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 22 hours ago, East London Loyal said: Quick question - Why doesn’t Rangers have a series of investors wanting to throw money in? Scottish football isn't an attractive proposition for a lot of the big investors either. We're a heritage name, poorly run and in a league they won't get their money back in due to poor sponsorship etc. We're relying on Champions League income and player sales in order to grow the club, and neither areas we're looking good in at this time (and never capitalised on player sales). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theiconicman 3,121 Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 If Rangers and the filth moved down south at the moment, we'd get relegated and they'd get promoted and that would be that. Turn the lights off on your way out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.