MartinGers93 388 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 They are paranoid because they have been saying everyone has been lying down to us because were skint but they just can't take it so the sfa have took immediate action on the appeal so they wouldn't think they would be against them aswell simple Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigalan1964 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 i have watched it a few times still cannot see the reason for the red card a very harsh decision the refs same old saying intent its fuckin harsh alright these scum fucks will be glad as miller and boydy would have ripped that defence to shreds Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudrupforever 17 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Collum should never referee another game. What a complete joke of a man he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Hmm, Loovens 6 months, Miller 18 hours, with the SFA apparently closed till after christmas/new year. It never went to the SFA i dont think, The referee just said their was no case to answer and said it was a 2 match ban? So whats the point in an appeal if you can't take it to the SFA stating the the ref got it wrong? You want to complain about a referees decision, but he has to agree with it first? Thats like having a contest out of 10 people,including yourself, to who can win £1million... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersLoyalist99 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 It was the ref who decided...Not the SFA it didnt get as far as them Surely the appeal should be going above the man who made the decision we are appealing against. Exactly mate what kind of system is that. Of course the ref isnt going to go back on his decision. That just sums up scottish football realy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 lets keep the paranoia to the tims it didn't get as far as the SFA, the ref looked at the decision again today and upheld it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
super hans 55 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Just seen it, one man doesn't make a team though. 1-4 Would have liked him to play, but I agree with you if beasley is fit I would go Boyd and Lafferty up front. No fucking chance. Lafferty should be nowhere near the squad nevermind the starting 11. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudrupforever 17 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 lets keep the paranoia to the tims it didn't get as far as the SFA, the ref looked at the decision again today and upheld it. Collum should never ever be allowed near another match unless he's paying at the gate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Bead rhattling bastards at the SPL, every single one of them! This is what we are up against, let's do celtc good and proper on Sunday. No Surrender! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinGers93 388 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Willie Colum-Teacher at my mates school says hes a rite tim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,743 Posted December 31, 2009 Author Share Posted December 31, 2009 Just seen it, one man doesn't make a team though. 1-4 Would have liked him to play, but I agree with you if beasley is fit I would go Boyd and Lafferty up front. No fucking chance. Lafferty should be nowhere near the squad nevermind the starting 11. I no, like when he played up top against Motherwell and scored two goals. Who would you play instead? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_ni 12 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 no difference between that and michael stewarts challenge. Neither deserved a red card yet we are the ones where its not rescinded. Oh well we will just have to do it the hard way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricksen_da_best 2,034 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Hmm, Loovens 6 months, Miller 18 hours, with the SFA apparently closed till after christmas/new year. It never went to the SFA i dont think, The referee just said their was no case to answer and said it was a 2 match ban? So whats the point in an appeal if you can't take it to the SFA stating the the ref got it wrong? You want to complain about a referees decision, but he has to agree with it first? Thats like having a contest out of 10 people,including yourself, to who can win £1million... Unless the Ref says after the game, he made a mistake. No action can be done to overturn any cards? as far as im aware. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2102 577 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Hmm, Loovens 6 months, Miller 18 hours, with the SFA apparently closed till after christmas/new year. It never went to the SFA i dont think, The referee just said their was no case to answer and said it was a 2 match ban? So whats the point in an appeal if you can't take it to the SFA stating the the ref got it wrong? You want to complain about a referees decision, but he has to agree with it first? Thats like having a contest out of 10 people,including yourself, to who can win £1million... basically you're right. the first stage of an appeal is the referee of the game will review the incident then write a summary of his decision both during the game and after he has reviewed the video footage. only if the decision changes will the incident go to a review panel which im pretty sure meet up on pre-determined dates. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 fuk them no one likes us we don`t care cmon the rangers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,657 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 why would willie collum RE teacher at t4ig school overturn such an obvious miscarriage of justice or im i not with the program Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 Ah well we will still fucking hammer them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamteuchter 1 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 To be expected i guess. Yet more double standards. He would have torn them another arsehole the form he is on too. Thats probably why he though eh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 fuck off! i wasn't expecting it to be changed, but i wasn't expecting a decision this quickly! oh well, let's go and do them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinGers93 388 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 why would willie collum RE teacher at t4ig school overturn such an obvious miscarriage of justice or im i not with the program but im just saying that hes a tim thats why the decision wasn't overturned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGers 96 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I wouldn't of been optimistic Miller would of won an appeal, however IMO the case presented infront of a panel had a chance of being overturned or downgraded. It wasn't a clear cut red card. TBH the system is poor when the referee who gave the card can decided if it can be appealed. That's like the policeman who caught you speeding, being able to decide if you can appeal the decision in court, or the parking warden deciding if you can appeal a parking ticket. It's a pretty ludicrous system, as refs naturally will be reluctant to admit they might of got it wrong, unless they made a total howler. Millers dismissal wasn't a total howler, as I can see why the ref gave the card, but.... I think there is a strong case for the defence as well, and certainly isn't a black or white decision. Exactly, there is no incentive for the ref to want to overturn it- if he did reverse the call, it makes him look foolish and probably affects his pay or the standard of the next match he referees. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,708 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I thought the whole point of an appeal was that you get the verdict from another panel because you think the person in question who made the decision (the ref) was wrong... and a lot of the time they would tend to stick by their decisions? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudrupforever 17 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 I thought the whole point of an appeal was that you get the verdict from another panel because you think the person in question who made the decision (the ref) was wrong... and a lot of the time they would tend to stick by their decisions? Not in the case of Scottish Football/Rangers. Fucking joke to a man, the refereeing system and SFA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jardy 0 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 bastards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisb72 50 Posted December 31, 2009 Share Posted December 31, 2009 No one likes us, we dont care. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts