Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I have been an active member of this forum for about 2 months now. One thing that is standing out (for me anyway) is the level of paranoia and sensitivity either by new threads or inputs to threads and others' opinions made. Firstly, lets take yesterday's game into account. "Muff" made a comment about a legal goal and Laff being lucky to stay on. He was both entitled and correct to form that opinion. However many came on to make hostile reactions to Muff's opinion. It seems that this is all to easy to do, rip into anything (or treat with upmost supicion, even if he is clearly an out and out bluenose) that seems to be "anti- Rangers. Let me do some straight talking; Rangers were pish yesterday. That was the worst I have seen us play there for over 30 years. The ref both got it wrong with the "goal" and Laff, no doubt. But can we not just laugh it off and make hay from it? There have been threads recently bemoaning Conroy doing this game and refs being biased etc etc. Conroy, I can assure you was/is a Celtic fan. He went to Seville but after yesterday's game can we claim he is anti-Rangers? Same with Collum, he got it wrong with Miller (even after video reiew) but all this ref pish goes round and comes round. Smeltic have had two dodgy decision against them in both Old Firm games this season but didn't we suffer a couple of years ago when we had the 2-1 and 3-2 games at Parkhead as well as the SPL decisions. Then there is another thread late last week stating that "Only An Excuse" is biased! What the fuck is all that about? What I will say is that we do have enenmies out there. Graham Speirs is lickin the tip of Liewells bell end, no doubt about it. And there some other journo's and public figures targeting us! Again no doubt. So yeh lets highlight these pricks but let's leave each other alone and join together to make this forum more enlightning, entertaining and prtects our traditions! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccoist355 4 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It was a fucking foul! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dietspam 733 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Fuck off ya timmy prick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dietspam 733 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It was a fucking foul! I thought it was genuine goal at first, but you can't argue with fact like that. Clear foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andymc10 6 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 i agree with him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccoist355 4 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It was a fucking foul! ...And im amazed you sight our reasoning to this end as a reason why the forum should "improve" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nameless Ghoul 6,136 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 U make a gd point, everyone is paranoid, im bad for it myself. The only thing i find annoying is 5/6 dif threads on the same topic! Will people have a quick read first, the mods and admin must spend ages combining threads! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dietspam 733 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I agree with him as well, but nothing will change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 If you think that was a goal yesterday then you are deluded, the pictures show it was a clear foul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinViesel 399 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The OP obviously didn't read the thread in question properly before he made this this thead. Muff was disputing the fact our official site was using the terms "legal goal," and a "lucky point." He wasn't making these points. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,758 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The OP obviously didn't read the thread in question properly before he made this this thead. Muff was disputing the fact our official site was using the terms "legal goal," and a "lucky point." He wasn't making these points. This Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Of course it can improve, quite simply, get rid of the infestation and it will be a far better place! Some of the OPs points are valid, but, bringing up whether or not Conroy or Collum are biased (or not as you were saying)..... I dont know how to do the slap head smiley, but its needed. No no, of course they arent? *insert sarcastic smiley here* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccoist355 4 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 If you think that was a goal yesterday then you are deluded, the pictures show it was a clear foul. Is the OP going to follow through on his righteousness and concede his error in stating the ref got it wrong with the goal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeBlue 39 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The OP obviously didn't read the thread in question properly before he made this this thead. Muff was disputing the fact our official site was using the terms "legal goal," and a "lucky point." He wasn't making these points. Just what I was thinking! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
royalbluebell 38 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Of course it can improve, quite simply, get rid of the infestation and it will be a far better place! Some of the OPs points are valid, but, bringing up whether or not Conroy or Collum are biased (or not as you were saying)..... I dont know how to do the slap head smiley, but its needed. No no, of course they arent? *insert sarcastic smiley here* They're not....at all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 :clout: bring it back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
radlord 24 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I know a lot of good posters stopped coming here or at least contributing articles after BlueDignity inexplicably got made admin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueIsTheColour 35 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I know a lot of good posters stopped coming here or at least contributing articles after BlueDignity inexplicably got made admin. Can you not join them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I know a lot of good posters stopped coming here or at least contributing articles after BlueDignity inexplicably got made admin. BlueDignity is a good guy and a real bear, do you mean the undercover tims stopped posting as Blue could spot them a mile away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I know a lot of good posters stopped coming here or at least contributing articles after BlueDignity inexplicably got made admin. Don't hold back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I know a lot of good posters stopped coming here or at least contributing articles after BlueDignity inexplicably got made admin. Unless its happened during the lovely 8 hours sleep I had last night, BD is not admin. I didn't get any sleep last night but as far as I'm aware unless I'm reading his title wrong BD ain't Admin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithgersbear 3,225 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I know a lot of good posters stopped coming here or at least contributing articles after BlueDignity inexplicably got made admin. Can you not join them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
radlord 24 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Well admin or 'website director', whatever that means, it doesn't matter. Sorry if I've touched a raw nerve guys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterC 12,476 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Well the site cant get any worse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts