BLUEDIGNITY 33,660 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 . . . his contract he can come back to Rangers for free ? A wid take him back in a New York minute ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,743 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 No. We are a better footballing team without him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
50ShadesofBlue 667 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Is that for real? That's a crazy clause for a club to agree too. I'd have him back but he'd need to up his game to get in the starting 11 now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,743 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 We should be looking for players to improve the first team, not warm the bench. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 No, I'd rather he didn't come back. He's one of the most frustrating players I've ever seen at Ibrox. If he'd been willing to try harder who knows how good he might have become?But no, we shouldn't let him back into his comfort zone. He's made his bed and all that.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu1993 101 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 surely he doesnt have that clause in his contract Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 for shuwa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluegecko 306 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 What club in their right mind would allow a saleable asset a clause like that in their contract?Still wouldn't have him back though not after the way he went about the last half of last season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaltersGotStyle 160 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 What club in their right mind would allow a saleable asset a clause like that in their contract?Still wouldn't have him back though not after the way he went about the last half of last seasonA club who were desperate to get a player? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo. 952 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Nope. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cameron1873 516 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 That clause will not be in his contract. Were did you even get that info from. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,660 Posted January 6, 2011 Author Share Posted January 6, 2011 It's in his contract alright ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleteduser1 169 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 No. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Not for me as he was offered a decent contract and refused it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irwin Sparkes 97 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 The fact Middlesbrough allowed him to sign just a 2 year deal makes me think he probably does have such a bizarre clause, though i'd imagine it also includes Celtic in itAnd no i wouldn't want him back. 28 in the summer and has about 2 years maximum left in him before he's back at Kilmarnock Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,660 Posted January 6, 2011 Author Share Posted January 6, 2011 celtic did make an approach and thebooler was right in that, but no meet, Boydie said no thanks. No way he's going the scum. It appears the bheggars are intent on doing a mo johnston on us again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irwin Sparkes 97 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 celtic did make an approach and thebooler was right in that, but no meet, Boydie said no thanks. No way he's going the scum. It appears the bheggars are intent on doing a mo johnston on us again. Imagine a partnership of Boyd and Hooper. It would flop even more than Boyd and McDonald. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueben_d 40 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Take him back for free and flog him 6 months later for a few million, makes sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 celtic did make an approach and thebooler was right in that, but no meet, Boydie said no thanks. No way he's going the scum. It appears the bheggars are intent on doing a mo johnston on us again. i wouldnt be so sure the boolers wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor 2 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 No thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Is that for real? For fuck sake..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sillybilly 151 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Take him back for free and flog him 6 months later for a few million, makes sense.this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 No Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo. 952 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Take him back for free and flog him 6 months later for a few million, makes sense.His 'big move' has been a disaster, he can't get a game for a team a the bottom of the English 2nd-tier!Even assuming he could get back into our first team...who in their right mind would spend a 'few' million on him now, and expect him to perform anywhere but the SPL?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 He can get to fuck! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts