garner

[BridgeIsBlue 66,606]

22 minutes ago, MaestroNiko said:

Bradshaw would have fit our style more and was cheaper but of course Warbs went for Garner

Hopefully the goals come soon otherwise he will be booted which is a shame because you cant not like him as a person, just as a footballer hes very limited.

Bradshaw was never going to come and play up here.

[Basrah Bear 2,981]

Just now, jackrfc95 said:

He's still our best option upfront. 

don't agree perhapsd doodoo would do better pr one of the young team

 

1 minute ago, jackunion said:

Be interesting to find out What sort of formation he played at Preston ? 4-4-2 or 4-3-3.

i think there's a player in there but as stated he's wasted in our formation. 

It's almost become unfashionable overnight to play a 4-4-2 these days

Positional play is irrelevant. Everyone can spot s good player out of position. Garner is pish no is or buts

[ForeverAndEver 71,546]

Better than the "King".

[Mr Soprano 13,964]

1 hour ago, STEPPS BOY said:

The sort of player who'd be better in a front two.

When playing a front three, your number nine needs to score goals..

Probably the fairest post regarding the guy I've read.

I really like Garner, but he needs to bury that header today and other chances like it that come his way.

[STEPPS BOY 73,999]

1 minute ago, Mr Soprano said:

Probably the fairest post regarding the guy I've read.

I really like Garner, but he needs to bury that header today and other chances like it that come his way.

He's a second striker.

The type who'd score 12-15 goals a season but his partner should be scoring 25-30..

[WATP-FOREVER 5,231]

1 hour ago, TEFTONG said:

I see a hat trick coming one game soon...

You see 3 in 1, I see 1 in 3.

[jackrfc95 4,255]

6 minutes ago, Basrah Bear said:

don't agree perhapsd doodoo would do better pr one of the young team

Apart from 2 good finishes against Partick Dodoo has done absolutely nothing in a Rangers shirt. 

[Basrah Bear 2,981]

2 minutes ago, jackrfc95 said:

Apart from 2 good finishes against Partick Dodoo has done absolutely nothing in a Rangers shirt. 

You are correct sir but not about him, about the wankfest that's Garner

[jackrfc95 4,255]

Just now, Basrah Bear said:

You are correct sir but not about him, about the wankfest that's Garner

I agree with most that Garner has to start scoring pretty soon however, the 3 games before today I thought he done ok and offered something different. It's not as if we have another striker sitting there that's made a decent case to start upfront. I think Miller is our top scorer with 4.

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

1 hour ago, cumnockbear said:

He's a 4-4-2 striker, said it for long enough, doesn't suit our style of play. 

This. 

Play him with a partner and he'll score plenty.

[Smile 26,610]

He's been a miss for me so far there is no denying his work rate but i like my strikers to score goals.

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

17 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said:

He's a second striker.

The type who'd score 12-15 goals a season but his partner should be scoring 25-30..

Would have to disagree with this part.  He's shown previously, albeit in a different league, that he's capable of scoring 20 odd goals a season.

[A.T.G 10,773]

They hype has came from the Aberdeen and Hearts games at home when the whole team and management were under pressure and the supporters were looking for a big performance

He probably delivered it most with his effort and desire in those two games and timing would have it that for me, after all the shit this season,they were the 2 most important games of our season as we were struggling to cement 2nd place, even 3rd

So timing really, had we lost both games I think it wouldn't be like it is now but the fact we won and he put in the best effort and display is the only reason I can think of

Today the players just looked like they were wanting to get away for Christmas dinner, was annoying as fuck, Garner also played shite and at the same time didn't put in as much as he has the past few games

Still got a lot to do but needs to start banging them in but also needs the service too

[Basrah Bear 2,981]

5 minutes ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

This. 

Play him with a partner and he'll score plenty.

Don't think so. Play any formation you like. Its a no .

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

Just now, Basrah Bear said:

Don't think so. Play any formation you like. Its a no .

Your opinion and you're entitled to it.

I disagree.

[Basrah Bear 2,981]

3 minutes ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

Your opinion and you're entitled to it.

I disagree.

this is not about scoring points. Our opinions differ.  I don't think he's good enough for Glasgow Rangers. Nothing he has done yet will make my mind differ.

 

Merry Christmas to you.

[ronniescu 2,978]

16 minutes ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

This. 

Play him with a partner and he'll score plenty.

The words "barrel" & "fannies" spring to mind. And don't get me started on that poofy song.

[Gman36 3,456]

2 hours ago, Pearson83 said:

Cult hero status for what 3 goals? Strange how fans mostly young ones now start all these songs for guys as if they are some crazy hard man. 

 

Almost as if younger supporters are trying to shape the present for themselves and create their own heroes, rather than those of their fathers and grandfathers..... 

I reckon Garner would have been a decent squad player in the great teams of old. A backup striker for the main front two. He would appear not to be good enough to be the main man in our team who's going to get us the goals we need. 

[Ross-Gazza genius 1,907]

It's starting to worry me that Garner is more effective in our own box than in the oppositions!!

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

34 minutes ago, ronniescu said:

The words "barrel" & "fannies" spring to mind. And don't get me started on that poofy song.

57 goals in the 3 seasons before he joined us but aye ok. He couldn't score in a barrel of fannies.

[Pearson83 1,059]

47 minutes ago, Gman36 said:

Almost as if younger supporters are trying to shape the present for themselves and create their own heroes, rather than those of their fathers and grandfathers..... 

I reckon Garner would have been a decent squad player in the great teams of old. A backup striker for the main front two. He would appear not to be good enough to be the main man in our team who's going to get us the goals we need. 

That's what's hard for me to take kids today thinking players like that are heroes but they don't have anybody else so i am just a moody old fart. 

Yeh he would be squad player in teams of old tbh he could come good if we had players who could cross a ball or pick him out better

[William McBeath 2,154]

4 hours ago, K.A.I said:

I've said my piece on him previously. Don't get the hype and he's another that's been shot upto cult hero stardom for reasons unknown to me.

Very limited footballer. 

Big and strong but that's about it. 

Missed the game today but I'm yet to see much either.

[HG5 11,134]

4 hours ago, K.A.I said:

I've said my piece on him previously. Don't get the hype and he's another that's been shot upto cult hero stardom for reasons unknown to me.

Very limited footballer. 

Big and strong but that's about it. 

He's 5'10'' - doesn't really qualify as big....

[Teamgers 1,214]

4 hours ago, Amac9 said:

All effort and no quality. 

Just like you eh?..............

 

[HG5 11,134]

1 hour ago, TheLoudenTavernier said:

57 goals in the 3 seasons before he joined us but aye ok. He couldn't score in a barrel of fannies.

6 in the one immediately prior.

Not the stat of someone who's getting better.