rossco87 691 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 3 minutes ago, Dan Deacon said: that Aberdeen situation is fucking wild What makes it even worse is they have tried to cover it up. Sportscene said on Saturday night they hadn’t been provided with the usual footage for VAR offside decisions with the lines and when they had asked the SPFL they had been told (paraphrasing slightly) “The SPFL doesn’t need to issue the footage, in this instance the decision is so clear and obvious that there is no need to provide the VAR footage”. It has echos of the handball that was ignored and then conveniently found to be offside 30 minutes later in the OF at their dump. In both instances the broadcaster has effectively outed their lies (at the time the Sky commentary team effectively confirmed they had heard no conversation of offside in the discussions between the ref and VAR), but nothing will come of it. magic8ball and Dan Deacon 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watp89 30 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 10 minutes ago, McEwan's Lager said: You'd be absolutely spewing. Surely you would just say in the absence of conclusive evidence that the on pitch decision stands. Isn't that what's meant to happen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McEwan's Lager 30,602 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 4 minutes ago, Watp89 said: Isn't that what's meant to happen. That's what I thought. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,214 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 16 minutes ago, McEwan's Lager said: You'd be absolutely spewing. Surely you would just say in the absence of conclusive evidence that the on pitch decision stands. Aye how can it be clear and obvious when they don’t even know if there’s been an error magic8ball, Dan Deacon and McEwan's Lager 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Blue Legend 61,606 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 Thank fuck Lennon doesn’t look like getting a job in management yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,214 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 5 minutes ago, Moody Blue Legend said: Thank fuck Lennon doesn’t look like getting a job in management yet. Looks like a Swedish boy is heading up your way Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Deacon 55,453 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 fa response Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Blue Legend 61,606 Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 4 minutes ago, RFC55 said: Looks like a Swedish boy is heading up your way Aye just heard on the news. No Lennon anywhere is good. Lads I know mostly hate him. That’s maybe a bit of an influenced view but! RFC55 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealWorldRich 669 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 What's the issue with the Aberdeen incident? Don't the VAR team have the authority to look at a still image if the line technology isn't functioning? Looks pretty clearly offside to me, I can see why they arrived at that provided it's in their remit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 65,089 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 1 hour ago, RealWorldRich said: What's the issue with the Aberdeen incident? Don't the VAR team have the authority to look at a still image if the line technology isn't functioning? Looks pretty clearly offside to me, I can see why they arrived at that provided it's in their remit. Not sure if serious McEwan's Lager 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealWorldRich 669 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 5 hours ago, The Specky Forum Organiser said: Not sure if serious Yes I'm serious, the Aberdeen statement contains this line in regard to using a still frame with the hawkeye being down: “The ability for the VARs to do this is contained within the VAR protocols." So, they accept the VAR is allowed to use a still frame in this circumstance? In which case.... They have more than 1 player that's very obviously offside. So what's the problem? They wanted an offside goal stand? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 65,089 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 2 minutes ago, RealWorldRich said: Yes I'm serious, the Aberdeen statement contains this line in regard to using a still frame with the hawkeye being down: “The ability for the VARs to do this is contained within the VAR protocols." So, they accept the VAR is allowed to use a still frame in this circumstance? In which case.... They have more than 1 player that's very obviously offside. So what's the problem? They wanted an offside goal stand? Still not sure if serious born a blue nose and Rangers_no1 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealWorldRich 669 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 15 minutes ago, The Specky Forum Organiser said: Still not sure if serious ok good for you Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers_no1 32,606 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 6 hours ago, The Specky Forum Organiser said: Not sure if serious Going by his posts since he started on here, he's 100% serious. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealWorldRich 669 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 58 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said: Going by his posts since he started on here, he's 100% serious. Why would I not be? It's very obviously offside, so wtf is the problem? You want an offside goal to stand because they can't draw lines that aren't even needed anyway? What if a guy scores a goal 10 yards offside while the linesman has tripped over and the hawkeye isn't working? Goal? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wully 47,680 Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 Morton v lorraine kelly XI @G.E.C. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 65,089 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 Livi 2 up at Tynecastle I've obviously got Hearts on the coupon Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCRobertson 11,789 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 14 minutes ago, The Specky Forum Organiser said: Livi 2 up at Tynecastle I've obviously got Hearts on the coupon Hearts back level in a 4 minute spell Hearts 3 - 2 now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluekev 44,168 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 Some first half at Tynecastle 😂 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlippinEck 3,708 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 Hibs sneaking in to top 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,313 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 31 minutes ago, FlippinEck said: Hibs sneaking in to top 6 No, down as it stands. Dundee have 3 minutes to not lose a goal and they get the spot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,313 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 sheep down to 10 😂 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,313 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 Dundee up hivs down 👏👏 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
folkestoneger 8,197 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 Timplosion to follow midweek when Dundee rest a few for the top 6 games to follow 😂😂😂 Bad Robot 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkylineBlue 23,560 Posted April 13 Share Posted April 13 Ia that top 6 secured for Dundee then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.