Officialdom Conspiracy?

[WCPRANGERS1 2,997]

On 05/08/2018 at 13:33, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Key Decisions For: 0

-

Key Decisions Against: 5

Versus Sheep 5/8/18

- Morelos red

- No red for penalty 

- Arfield held, butted against, and booked

- GMS not carded throwing ball at player 

- May clattering Jack

 

******************

Don't know what score it'll end up, but

1. Morelos barged twice and flicks a boot. Straight red.

2. Rangers player yanked back in box, ref couldn't fail but to give a pen. No attempt at ball. Clear red, no card given.

It's going to be a long fucking season.

Edit.

3. Rangers player being held by the jersey, a head forced into his forehead, and both players get equally punished with a yellow.

4. Player throws ball aggressively at, not towards, a Rangers player

5. May clattering Jack. At least a yellow.

Conspiracy 5. Rangers nil.

Goldson yellow?

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

54 minutes ago, WCPRANGERS1 said:

Goldson yellow?

My rules, I decide. ?

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

Take it BP9s thread just got sacked by admin ??

[BridgeIsBlue 66,606]

2 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Take it BP9s thread just got sacked by admin ??

Hopefully banned as well the rodent. 

[WCPRANGERS1 2,997]

4 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

My rules, I decide. ?

So it's 6-0 then right......

[Thermopylae 15,286]

On 6/8/2018 at 19:31, Bluekev said:

Wonder no longer where Star Wars got the inspiration for the evil empire  

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

Post 1 updated 

[ForeverAndEver 71,528]

The Queen is a shapeshifting reptilian 

[GOAT 30,449]

On 05/08/2018 at 13:33, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Key Decisions For: 0

-

Key Decisions Against: 5

Versus Sheep 5/8/18

- RESCINDED Morelos red

- No red for penalty 

- Arfield held, butted against, and booked

- GMS not carded throwing ball at player 

- May clattering Jack, no card

 

Rescinded Rangers Red Cards: 1

If we’re going to do this we need to at least do it properly and not be biased.  Arfield wasn’t butted, it was a yellow card for the sheep player, he grabbed his shirt and squared up to him, nothing more or less, Arfield should never have been booked though.  That was a joke.  

Mad for the wee poof throwing a ball at someone, come on to fuck.  ?

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

3 minutes ago, GOAT said:

If we’re going to do this we need to at least do it properly and not be biased.  Arfield wasn’t butted, it was a yellow card for the sheep player, Arfield should never have been booked though.  That was a joke.  

Mad for the wee poof throwing a ball at someone, come on to fuck.  ?

Placing a forehead into his is being butted against. Having the head stuck in him I'd have said head butted. I'd didn't, nor did I mention the sheep player deserving of a red for his actions. He wasn't, as he didn't headbutt, which I didn't allege.

Nothing biased or improper. You have misread interpreted word.

Shall I dig out the rule which specifically states it's a yellow to throw a ball AT a player? Shite, yes, but a rule that again the ref refused to enforce.

Challenge rejected.

[GeeSS 512]

1 minute ago, GOAT said:

If we’re going to do this we need to at least do it properly and not be biased.  Arfield wasn’t butted, it was a yellow card for the sheep player, Arfield should never have been booked though.  That was a joke.  

Mad for the wee poof throwing a ball at someone, come on to fuck.  ?

The sheep player lifted his hands and grabbed the neck of airfields shirt pushing his face into Arfield therefore adopting an overly agressive attitude clear red card offence

[GOAT 30,449]

1 minute ago, GeeSS said:

The sheep player lifted his hands and grabbed the neck of airfields shirt pushing his face into Arfield therefore adopting an overly agressive attitude clear red card offence

I think you’ll find squaring up to someone is a yellow card offence. 

[GOAT 30,449]

2 minutes ago, GeeSS said:

The sheep player lifted his hands and grabbed the neck of airfields shirt pushing his face into Arfield therefore adopting an overly agressive attitude clear red card offence

Och away ye go, in that case big Katic should have saw red in our European game last week.  

[ForeverAndEver 71,528]

Key decisions for; penalty

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

Just now, ForeverAndEver said:

Key decisions for; penalty

Ram it.

[ForeverAndEver 71,528]

1 minute ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Ram it.

It's a key decision that went our way.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

1 minute ago, ForeverAndEver said:

It's a key decision that went our way.

Any ambiguity over it? Was it debatable or unjust in our favour?

[ForeverAndEver 71,528]

3 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Any ambiguity over it? Was it debatable or unjust in our favour?

That's not what the OP says though, just key decisions.

 

[blueredandwhite 47]

On ‎05‎/‎08‎/‎2018 at 13:33, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Key Decisions For: 0

-

Key Decisions Against: 5

Versus Sheep 5/8/18

- RESCINDED Morelos red

- No red for penalty 

- Arfield held, butted against, and booked

- GMS not carded throwing ball at player 

- May clattering Jack, no card

 

Rescinded Rangers Red Cards: 1

If we are going to keep track of decisions for, the we surely need to say the Penalty is at least a key decision for, despite the lack of Red to build a fair case, going forward. Is the plan to amend this after every Scottish tie to reflect the situation?

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

7 minutes ago, blueredandwhite said:

If we are going to keep track of decisions for, the we surely need to say the Penalty is at least a key decision for, despite the lack of Red to build a fair case, going forward. Is the plan to amend this after every Scottish tie to reflect the situation?

The pen was never in debate, not even Walker thought it wasn’t one. 

The key decision there was not sending off Ball or even booking the cunt. 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

50 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

That's not what the OP says though, just key decisions.

 

The OP has been reduced in content following on from comments and requests throughout the thread. To keep a list of dodgy decisions for and against in the one place.

It's under a refereeing conspiracy title. So non debatable ones for and against aren't being included, only debatable / questionable type ones that were game changers or obvious rule breaches, wrongly punished etc.

Key decisions in a refereeing conspiracy debate you could say.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

3 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

The pen was never in debate, not even Walker thought it wasn’t one. 

The key decision there was not sending off Ball or even booking the cunt. 

This. And why I wouldn't have added in the against column if we'd conceded it.

Have made a wee update to the initial post to make it a wee bit more understandable for the wee petals.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,729]

Soooooooooo. Thoughts on today?  Not seen the red card decision again, but plenty saying it was a red. 

Personally I thoughts ref was a 3/10, let blatant sore ones go unpunished.

Arguably worst tackle (young Kent will disagree with his black and blue legs) was the one on coulibaly on the touchline. Ball wasn't even considered, that was retribution for taking the piss out of them. 

[NeoGeo7 10,530]

2 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Soooooooooo. Thoughts on today?  Not seen the red card decision again, but plenty saying it was a red. 

Personally I thoughts ref was a 3/10, let blatant sore ones go unpunished.

Arguably worst tackle (young Kent will disagree with his black and blue legs) was the one on coulibaly on the touchline. Ball wasn't even considered, that was retribution for taking the piss out of them. 

I think the ref got a lot wrong today but the red was a red and I would have been screaming for a red if it was the other way.....whether that would have been given if the,shoe was on the other foot though is highly unlikely, probably a yellow if it was against us.

[Lothianbear 361]

9 minutes ago, NeoGeo7 said:

I think the ref got a lot wrong today but the red was a red and I would have been screaming for a red if it was the other way.....whether that would have been given if the,shoe was on the other foot though is highly unlikely, probably a yellow if it was against us.

totally agree, would have been a yellow