Jump to content

SFA ruling on Rangers re criticism of Willie Collum.


Smile

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Smile said:

5 charges.

Outcome: Charge 1 - proven - £5,000 fine

Charge 2 - not proved

Charge 3 - proven - £1000 fine

Charge 4 - not proved

Charge 5 - withdrawn

Just in time for the SFA  Christmas party a nice earner for Lieswell and his pals🤔

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Smile said:

What was the point of making the fuss at the time big mouth again costing us 6 grand.

That we continue to make the point regularly that the standard of officiating is less than we, as a club ( or indeed any other club ) should be expected  to accept !

I imagine the club will continue to do so in the future until it registers 'elsewhere' and can no longer be ignored by the media - may be wrong !

Every such 'challenge to their bias' will eventually, with prompting, catch the attention of UK national media or even EUFA !

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Algeran said:

That we continue to make the point regularly that the standard of officiating is less than we, as a club ( or indeed any other club ) should be expected  to accept !

I imagine the club will continue to do so in the future until it registers 'elsewhere' and can no longer be ignored by the media - may be wrong !

Every such 'challenge to their bias' will eventually, with prompting, catch the attention of UK national media or even EUFA !

No, don’t agree. The refs continually make absurd decisions and they go unpunished. We speak up against them and we get fined. So to the outsider it looks like it’s Rangers that have done something wrong as only they have been fined and no one else punished.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, murzo said:

No, don’t agree. The refs continually make absurd decisions and they go unpunished. We speak up against them and we get fined. So to the outsider it looks like it’s Rangers that have done something wrong as only they have been fined and no one else punished.

I understand where you are coming from but the fine, what £5/6k, is not that substantial if eventually we get the point across !

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, standup said:

Off topic but still, does anyone know if uefa have charged bheasts for the salzburg player hit by a coin thrown from the bheast support. I cant see anything about it other than it did happen.

Yeah that one has been sweep sweeped from the rhagtops analysis  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bears r us said:

Has Brenda/them ever been charged for criticising refs in the last few years ?? :thinking:

👍

He/she only gets phoned up to be apologised to ..... some say its in his contract that was approved by an "independent" panel of referees .... :thuglife:

:UK: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ritchieshearercaldow said:

So we’ve pissed £5k/6k away for what ?

Pays for the refs association Xmas  party probably.

Cost us 6k to very publicly slate the referee that shafted us, get our point accross that there are underlying issues with the refereeing in this country, and tell the world how pissed off we are with it.

We knew we were breaking the rules when we broke them.  We did it anyway in the full knowledge that we would be charged and fined.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, murzo said:

No, don’t agree. The refs continually make absurd decisions and they go unpunished. We speak up against them and we get fined. So to the outsider it looks like it’s Rangers that have done something wrong as only they have been fined and no one else punished.

We did do something wrong to be fair. 

The rules are pretty clear on this, you can't as a club, publicly slate the referee.

The motherwell manager is on a 3 game ban for doing a very similar thing after the game with us.

The club released an official statement slating a ref, of course we are going to be charged for it.  I said it would happen as soon as we released the statement.   Still happy we released it, and totally fine with the charge and subsequent fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, loyalfollower said:

I still can’t see how it’s proven that collum is not biased.  Rangers hinted at it in the previous statement so surely the Stupid Fucking Arseholes have to prove that he’s not biased before issuing us  with a fine??

They don't have to prove anything mate.   IMO he is very biased.   It's almost impossible to prove or disprove.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 25 May 2024 14:00 Until 16:00
      0  
      celtic v Rangers
      Hampden Park
      Scottish Cup
×
×
  • Create New...