They Gnu 11,553 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 34 minutes ago, psb07158 said: Who gives a fuck, all this will do is enrage them even more that we were able to play them for a few games 😂😂 Play Broxi at RB against them for all I care tbh, it's party time Right back ya fuckin maniac, attacking midfielder all daylong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Traive 22,944 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Keen to help out but I couldnae overlap my coffee table these days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Traive 22,944 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 32 minutes ago, psb07158 said: Who gives a fuck, all this will do is enrage them even more that we were able to play them for a few games 😂😂 Play Broxi at RB against them for all I care tbh, it's party time Broxi is never a RB, he’s a CM (club mascot) all day long Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the cry was no 3,035 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 29 minutes ago, falkirkNS said: Dubaigate was months ago now, just sweep it aside, the whole scandal. the club should be involving legal team now. Maxwell confirmed at the end of last week that there was "nothing to see" re Dubai (literally his words ffs) Barely a mention in the mhedia of course The problem, as ever, is consistency. A player flying to Spain for his hole, returning and training for 3 days and than coming off the bench and actually playing gets a 3 match (plus 2 suspended) ban while our two got straight seven despite not leaving the country, not training and not playing. The thumb throws a party for a couple of dozen at his gaffe and yellow fangs describes it as "no biggie" and fuck all happens Ping pong flies in some whore from the biggest affected country in the world (USA) and fuck all happens There were numerous breeches in Dubai and the SFA bottle it. Encouragingly wee Doogie looks like he's sick of the double standards and it would not surprise me at all if he lawyered up for a square go. As someone else pointed out a decent lawyer would smash these useless, corrupt cunts to pieces. Fingers crossed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
They Gnu 11,553 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 2 minutes ago, Colin Traive said: Broxi is never a RB, he’s a CM (club mascot) all day long He’d be great in the tunnel intimidating the the Tarriers pre match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hammer 11 2,594 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Are we back to being the establishment yet 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Williamson. 82,916 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 I hope this doesn’t impact our title push. There’s a long way to go in the season still and I’ll be furious if this ends up stopping us winning the title Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris182 6,317 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 25 minutes ago, Gazzalivesforever said: Disciplinary Rule 77 - A recognised football body, club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall, at all times, act in the best interests of Association Football. Furthermore such person or body shall not act in any manner which is improper or use any one, or a combination of, violent Conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour. I fail to see how this rule has been broken. Can someone enlighten me? It's rule breach bingo. Doesn't matter mate, they've already decided they're fucked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrLaudrup 4,690 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 The question will be if their bans run into next season or just until the end of this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclovin9091 1,402 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 46 minutes ago, Gazzalivesforever said: Disciplinary Rule 77 - A recognised football body, club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall, at all times, act in the best interests of Association Football. Furthermore such person or body shall not act in any manner which is improper or use any one, or a combination of, violent Conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour. I fail to see how this rule has been broken. Can someone enlighten me? Breaking laws is improper conduct. Its the other rule that i can work out that they apparently broke??? Unless they have COVID relate rules in the laws of the game. Disciplinary Rule 24 - A recognised football body, club, official, Team Official or other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall be subject to and shall comply with the Articles, the Laws of the Game and the rules, procedures and regulations, bye-laws and Decisions of the Scottish FA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theweebluenose 4,332 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 46 minutes ago, Goofy The Scot said: Dunno if Jimmy would manage the full 90 mins if i'm being honest....... Would be red carded within the first minute for assaulting Brown or Griffiths. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goofy The Scot 593 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, theweebluenose said: Would be red carded within the first minute for assaulting Brown or Griffiths. Arrested for attempted murder mair like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMax399 3,783 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 To be expected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 hour ago, falkirkNS said: Dubaigate was months ago now, just sweep it aside, the whole scandal. the club should be involving legal team now. CO was meant to look at that ,Obviously the pics of drinking with the public is allowed so long as you have a 1st and 2nd division to close down to take the hit . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 40 minutes ago, .Williamson. said: I hope this doesn’t impact our title push. There’s a long way to go in the season still and I’ll be furious if this ends up stopping us winning the title Getting worried about that too mate ,😁 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reformation Bear 6,453 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Hmmmm, In the current hostile atmosphere whipped up by the SNP politicians with their lapdog agencies (SFA, SPFL, Police, stray dog warden society, etc) might the Rangers Board be tempted to go into this staged show trial to contest it vigorously. And then - because it will have been pre-judged - refuse to accept the verdict on the basis that it is plainly vindictive with a set of rules being interpreted one way (ultra adversely) for Rangers and another way for a certain other football club that occupies some space in Glasgow. In other words pick a fight on this one in order to try to avoid a precedent being set. Because if those rules are successfully used against these players on the charge as specified, then might more notices of complaint be raised citing the celebration scenes in the dressing room and in the Training Centre. Ordinarily I'd say 'pick your battles because not everything is of equal importance'. But in the current hostile climate maybe every battle of rules and assertion of 'leadership' is important eh. Will be interesting to see whether the Club does its dignified compliant 'just take it' line or whether battle fever is engaged. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billscott 2,463 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 2 hours ago, Bad Robot said: Surely a decent lawyer can rip right through this for discrimination due to there been no complaint re Dubai 🤷♂️ the explanation they gave for dubai was it was photos only and they cannot charge anyone based on just photos dont jump on me i am just aying the excuse they gave Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,376 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 1 minute ago, billscott said: the explanation they gave for dubai was it was photos only and they cannot charge anyone based on just photos dont jump on me i am just aying the excuse they gave yes which was absolute nonsense as they could have asked the ones in the photos if it was them in the photos but shit it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billscott 2,463 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 2 minutes ago, Bad Robot said: yes which was absolute nonsense as they could have asked the ones in the photos if it was them in the photos but shit it could not agree more but that was what they gave as a get out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserJon 12,422 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Five subs against them. Just fantasy nonsense but have Gary Mac, Gerrard himself, Broxi bear, Lovenkrands and then Jimmy Bell to really GIRUY 👍 oh and any penalties to be taken by McGregor. All scarfs to be tied to the posts and of course a piss take huddle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fantana 28,894 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Haha, fuck yeez. Champions. Get it up ye Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 2 hours ago, Bad Robot said: Surely a decent lawyer can rip right through this for discrimination due to there been no complaint re Dubai 🤷♂️ That was "sanctioned" by the SFA and SG way before the pandemic became a bloody crisis, no way could they possibly refuse permission or hold the scum accountable when humza was in charge. The issue into the problem however will be about the same time that the paedodome get investigated by plod. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrotherTJ 172 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 2 hours ago, DrLaudrup said: The question will be if their bans run into next season or just until the end of this one. I'm sure it'll be carried over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrLaudrup 4,690 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, BrotherTJ said: I'm sure it'll be carried over. That’s my view. That they will look to the and immediately disadvantage us next season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don81 2,846 Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 Clearly doing there best to make the bans carry into next season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.