chris182 6,297 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, KBOO72 said: Can anyone clear up whether he can play tomorrow or not? When do we have to appeal by if that's the route we decide to go down? We've appealed supposedly, he can play Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, KBOO72 said: Can anyone clear up whether he can play tomorrow or not? When do we have to appeal by if that's the route we decide to go down? He can play tomorrow, hearing on Tuesday. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,796 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 41 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: And in amongst it all the worst challenge of Wednesday was Brown, who escapes with a yellow. Any wonder they are top of the fair play table when 1 yellow us given between Brown Burke and Simunovic yet Rangers (potentially x 2), Sheep and Hivs players get reds and /or 2 game bans. When was the last time the compliance Officer cited and banned a scum player...? Zero transparency. Maximum bias in favour of one club. Starting to look like corruption to me. eejay the dj and bazman 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Blue 9,352 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Was the mhanks CB (can’t even be arsed trying to spell his name) cited for his assault on the Hivs player? Naw!...funnny that Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastEnclosureBear 2,919 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Making it up as they go along. Fucking mongos eejay the dj 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,286 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 6 minutes ago, SIRB_72 said: Aw for fuck sake it just gets worse with each case. Scottish football is an absolute joke. Isn't the point of them not allowing yellows to be appealed or taken further because every team would do it all the time? That's probably too sensible for up here. Apparently the ref didn't have a clear enough view. So they can take action even with a booking. It's just being made up by the SFA as they go along. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GA1972 9,556 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 If anyone knows anything about Italian football Lawell & Scum = Juventus & Moggi It’ll all come out eventually bazman and Bluekev 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted February 8, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted February 8, 2019 Amazes me that the tarriers still think there's an agenda against them, how in the blue fuck does Simunovic, Brown and Burke get away with what they done? TEFTONG, frenv, murzo and 4 others 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBOO72 4,372 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, chris182 said: We've appealed supposedly, he can play Is this confirmed? 2 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: He can play tomorrow, hearing on Tuesday. Have we definitely appealed then? BridgeIsBlue 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, KBOO72 said: Is this confirmed? Have we definitely appealed then? Yes. KBOO72 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandyinroyalblue 16,478 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, Moody Blue said: Was the mhanks CB (can’t even be arsed trying to spell his name) cited for his assault on the Hivs player? Naw!...funnny that Michael Stewart never cited him. Moody Blue and BlueAvenger 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammer93 15,057 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 How can McGregor get a 2 match ban but Brown with a similar challenge on Candieas gets nothing 🤔 Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,286 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, KBOO72 said: Is this confirmed? Have we definitely appealed then? Reports are we appealed so he's free tomorrow. Hearing this Tuesday. KBOO72 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy Vandenbroucke 26,159 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, KBOO72 said: Is this confirmed? Have we definitely appealed then? According to Emma Dodds (reporter for BT and Premier Sports) on Twitter, we have. KBOO72 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie0202 12,272 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Quote Fast Track Notice of Complaint | Darnell Johnson, Player, Hibernian FC Friday 8 February 2019 Player: Darnell Johnson, Hibernian FC Match: celtic FC v Hibernian FC, 6 February 2019 Competition: SPFL Premiership Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached: Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player. Any Fast Track Notice of Complaint alleging a breach of this Rule shall be Determined by a Fast Track Tribunal subject to the provisions of Section 13. Fast Track Tribunal Hearing: Tuesday 12 February 2019 See the part highlighted in bold. Surely they're breaking their own rules if he has been booked? Not trying to derail this thread but it's all part of the same discussion regarding these disciplinary hearings. eejay the dj, Bears r us, Bluekev and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,696 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Fucking Darnell Jamie0202 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prso's headband 35,452 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 “Not seen by the officials” SeparateEntityMyArse, sandyinroyalblue, eejay the dj and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
berkshirebear 2,771 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Surely Mcgregor is protecting himself? Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBOO72 4,372 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, Jamie0202 said: Fast Track Notice of Complaint | Darnell Johnson, Player, Hibernian FC Friday 8 February 2019 Player: Darnell Johnson, Hibernian FC Match: celtic FC v Hibernian FC, 6 February 2019 Competition: SPFL Premiership Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached: Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player. Any Fast Track Notice of Complaint alleging a breach of this Rule shall be Determined by a Fast Track Tribunal subject to the provisions of Section 13. Fast Track Tribunal Hearing: Tuesday 12 February 2019 See the part highlighted in bold. Surely they're breaking their own rules if he has been booked? Not trying to derail this thread but it's all part of the same discussion regarding these disciplinary hearings. They don't have a fucking clue mate. We should be asking for an independent inquiry because it's clear as day they aren't fit for purpose. Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negri's lovechild 14,052 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 There are two definite camps concerning wether or not McGregor should be cited for the clash with Ferguson. In my opinion, it could be seen as naughty but I didn't see a real problem with it as his momentum takes him through. The game is the way it is because of opinions, and that's why we are all here. passion. the issue we do need to address though is this insistence on trial by media. It's not the first time recently where rough and tumble things happen during games, and nothing is spoken about initially. They pass, we get on with the game. But, afterwards there becomes a focus on decisions mainly involving us, where the drive is to take us to task. The focus on Morelos in particular is quite awful. He is a hard player, fiery, and yes petulant at times. Someone likened him to Diego Costa, where there's a bit of the devil there. That is absolutely fine in Scotland, unless he plays for Rangers. we are scrutinised to a different degree from the other clubs in Scotland. That may be down to our profile, but then celtic have a similar profile and there are never (or rarely) any incidents involving them reported to the compliance officer. We need to ask questions as to why that is the case (providing evidence). These incidents are increasingly being raised by the press, both written and visual and they are doing it in a way that creates a furore and a momentum that the compliance officer must pay attention to. it's getting to the stage where fairly minimal incidents are being given a life of their own, and are blown away out of proportion. the incidents involving celtic from the other night are being raised as an example of the lack of balance that is there when It comes to Rangers. It must stop. We can influence it as fans by not watching or reading their drivel, and by asking them why certain incidents are being highlighted over others. It's at the point in dreading watching highlights packages as I wonder what lies or instances they will fabricate. Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Specky Forum Organiser 64,696 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 Just now, Prso's headband said: “Not seen by the officials” Must have blinked for about 10 seconds Prso's headband 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy Vandenbroucke 26,159 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, Jeffrey said: Fucking Darnell You owe me a tenner dickhead The Specky Forum Organiser, BridgeIsBlue, ForeverAndEver and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie0202 12,272 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Jeffrey said: Fucking Darnell ForeverAndEver 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BridgeIsBlue 66,606 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Bronzy said: You owe me a tenner dickhead CONTROLLLLLLLLLL IT ForeverAndEver and Davy Vandenbroucke 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NornIronBear 450 Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 7 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said: Amazes me that the tarriers still think there's an agenda against them, how in the blue fuck does Simunovic, Brown and Burke get away with what they done? I'm starting to believe they don't, it's a clever smear campaign designed to hinder us and put pressure on the officials during match time and if they don't do their bidding then the sfa will. Far too often no action is taken against their players or club. No other countries FA would sit back and ignore a film being authorised and made in a members stadium claiming what anyone but cltic claims. The club would be charged with disrepute. Bears r us, Bristol loyal, WATP-FOREVER and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.