beararse
-
Posts
5,525 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by beararse
-
-
17 minutes ago, Jamie0202 said:
Fuck knows then. I've looked at both sites and the main descrepancy seems to be the number of shots taken so no idea which one to trust.
I work on the principle they are broadly on the right lines. As long as any comparison I make is from the same site I guess it’s reasonably safe to assume they are comparable.
-
3 minutes ago, Jamie0202 said:
Where you seeing that? I'm lifting the 15% directly off of https://fbref.com/en/comps/40/shooting/Scottish-Premiership-Stats#all_stats_shooting
Footystats.org
-
1 minute ago, KeyserSoze said:
It’s not- it’s still +2 and if it comes down to goal difference goals against count.
Still better scoring 3 and conceding one as it would go to goals scored if goal difference and head to head happened to be level.
-
6 minutes ago, Jamie0202 said:
Thought I would check out the stats and in the league Dessers has the most shots per 90 minutes and the most shots on target per 90 minutes, the latter being really surprising. His conversion rate is 15% which is identical to Shankland. Miovski has a 12% conversion rate.
The completely made up donkey player with the 2 in 10 is smashing it up with his 20% conversion rate 😂
He’s got a 20% conversion rate in the league. Shankland’s is 23.3%
-
3 hours ago, Redemption80 said:
We want a striker that scores the most amount of goals.
10 attempts and 2 goals is better than 2 attempts and 1 goal.
Exactly.
-
30 minutes ago, 6superbarry6 said:
So do we want a striker who scores 20% of the time or one who scores 50% of the time
4 hours ago, .Williamson. said:What sort of stupid shite is that? The answer is clearly creates 2 and scores 1
My guess is he meant ‘in a game’. ie would prefer to watch a striker with the same goal return who creates very little but is lethal or one who creates loads of chances but only converts a small proportion. Isn’t that hards concept to grasp (unless you take everything literally)
Personally, id prefer one who created (and fluffed) loads of chances but still scored roughly the same amount of goals.
-
4 hours ago, .Williamson. said:
He won’t be a hero or a legend in my eyes even if we do somehow win the treble because it’ll most likely have been achieved in spite of him missing some absolute sitters in big games
That’s the spirit.
-
2 hours ago, molesmole said:
Best Striker at the club now.
Scored plenty goals (could be double)
Think he will score even more next season
First season in Scotland and done well. Infuriating but scores.
The 20 goal striker we don't want.
This.
The whole 'we need a 20 goal a season striker but not this one' gets on my tits.
Its not Dessers' fault Roofe is made of glass, Lammers misfired, Danillo and Lovelace got crocked (you can add in Sima too even tho he's not a striker) and £35m man Silva is utter shite, meaning we've had to rely on him leading the line through most of the campaign.
He misses a fair amount of guilt edged chances but he has scored some crackers manufactured from nowt.
Weirdly if he was a 20 goal a season man who scored the obvious ones and did little else (ala Colak) we'd probably be raving about him.
- RealWorldRich and molesmole
-
2
-
12 minutes ago, Bydo said:
There’s plenty of morons on here then.
Listen, do I think he’s rotten? No. His goal tally laughs at that notion.
BUT
Do you see the absolute nonsense he puts himself, and us, through any time he gets any opportunity to actually think about what he has to do? Such a poor decision maker, tries to walk the ball into the net and for some reason always seems to have his back to goal when it’s put through to him in a crowded box.
Shankland, as a striker, is far far more clinical.
If you call having a shot/goal conversion of 23.3% is ‘far far more clinical’ than Dessers’ 20% rate.
-
5 minutes ago, jamess said:
Its info like this that makes me happy with the easy going mindless commentary on RTV.
Tom Miller is fucking chronic. It’s like listening to a hospital radio DJ.
- jamess, delparlane and bam74
-
1
-
2
-
Is the game not on RTV for us (cough) overseas fans?
-
Just now, Loyal72 said:
That confused you?
Shouldn't confuse you, here's Tav speaking in 2019.
Fair point, but there was no blood to smell when we played County. We showed great resilience and effectively scored 4 v celtic in 45 mins and (at that stage) were ready to take a clear lead at the top of the league and remained on course for a treble.
Dundee probably based their approach on County's showing and choose to attack us. That's when their arses collapsed.
-
1 hour ago, dummiesoot said:
I don’t think you can compare Goldson’s semifinal comments to Dujon’s.
Connor’s comments were delivered ‘defeatist’ to me, Dujon sounds pissed off.
Plus Goldson is a seasoned professional, had been at Rangers for 3 years at the point and was vice captain, when he said what he said.
Sterling is just in the door and still not a guaranteed starter (although he absolutely should be) yet he's clearly identified where the issues lie.
-
The thing that has confused the fuck out of me this past week is the Ross County and Dundee didnt sit back. There was no low block. They took the game to us and we absolutely shat it.
I'd happily see the whole lot binned bar Sterling (and Butland but he'll be offski). You don't necessarily have to be the best to be a success at anything, but you have to have the right mindset.
-
8 hours ago, RFC55 said:
Penalties? The away the goals he’s scored he’s set up over 100 goals in a thousand game, he’s more than contributed compared to forward players.
between goals and assists he’s been involved in a 1/4 of them you’d need to be a mongo to dismiss that
You can't question his scoring record, but you have to question his role as captain. Should have been stripped of it immediately following THAT match day program IMO.
-
39 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:
Hes lost the ability to pass the ball so he's not really anything be it a 5, 8, 10, 11 or any number from a pack of fucking cards.
He’s a no.2
-
Absolutely chronic.
-
You just know they’ll come good once the title is out their reach mathematically.
Shower of shite.
The whole fucking lot of them bar Butland, Yilmaz, Sterling and Diomande can fuck off.
- demise, GA1972 and theiconicman
-
3
-
-
- Popular Post
Can somebody please explain what Lawrence offers to this team because I haven’t a bloody clue.
Utter shite.
-
4 hours ago, Jimfanciesthedude said:
Seen this on twitter, absolutely appalling record, not all on him but he's been there and major part of it
31 points from a possible 109 against celtic AND 68 points lost in old firm games?
Something doesn’t add up.
109-31 is 78.
Makes you wonder if some of the other stuff listed is a lot of shite too..
-
-
4 minutes ago, BlueSuedeSambas said:
31 appearances, 2 goals, 2 assists and 2 absolute sitters missed. He might be playing well now, but he was complete garbage for us.
Cant argue against those stats. I didnt think he was any worse than anyone else under Beale to be honest and he improved under Clement but then fell out of favour. Lacked the mental resilience to play for Rangers, not skill IMO.
-
2 hours ago, Albertzz said:
Why we selling lammers at a loss when he’s been somewhat successful on loan?
I was pandering to his critics who seem happy to flog him at half price.
Personally I didn’t think he was that bad at Rangers. Never scored much but did OK in what was (now) obviously not his natural position. He was clearly a lad with some skill.
Id have him back to be honest. Even out of position, he's an upgrade on Lawrence IMO who is absolutely shite but I can’t see him wanting to come back.
Gerrard reportedly in for Tav and Goldson
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
We ain’t getting 10m+ for Tav.
Not even from the Saudi’s
Not a chance in hell.