TravelingWilBEARy 4,319 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 correct me if im wrong but 9iar didnt cause our current state wee Dick did! exactly It was chasing the Champions League dream under Advocaat which has gotten us into this trouble Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulSeas 10 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 This poll is a wind up, imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henders82 544 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Of course it was worth it!! Even though the 2 are not even remotely linked!! All the more worth it to see Laudo score a header!! WATP!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 109,706 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 This poll reeks of tattiedome Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumshie 205 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 We net-spent more during Advocaats time than we did during 9IAR. Our debt was more than manageable when PLG was in charge. Our current debt is because of A. the Kaunas disaster B. Smith spending over £20m in two close seasons including a fortune on the likes of Lafferty, Whittaker etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam_RFC 238 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Yes 9iar was worth it it was amazin growin up while it was happenin think it spoilt alot of rangers fans now cause we.ve got alot of fickle fans Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Stupid poll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithgersbear 3,225 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Rangers exists to be the best. Being the best is winning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethemighty 186 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Ofcourse winning 9iar was worth it, but we were in financial shit after Advocaat tried to get us to the later stages of the cl. Our debt was brought down after the Mcleish era where Mclleland was in charge, when we brought in PLG we had very little debt, but refused to sanction any spending so he was always gonna fail (personaaly id rather have given PLG £30mil to spend than Walter) but we gave Walter £30mil that he mostly wasted but no one will say anything about it 'cos Walters a legend' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Manticore* 1,893 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 No, nobody ever criticises Walter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flecky1 4 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Ofcourse winning 9iar was worth it, but we were in financial shit after Advocaat tried to get us to the later stages of the cl. Our debt was brought down after the Mcleish era where Mclleland was in charge, when we brought in PLG we had very little debt, but refused to sanction any spending so he was always gonna fail (personaaly id rather have given PLG £30mil to spend than Walter) but we gave Walter £30mil that he mostly wasted but no one will say anything about it 'cos Walters a legend' wrong mate ive been banging on about it for ages, and im not the only one, far from it, Walter will not progress us, he would keep filling the squad with 2m pound journeymen if he could imo and obviously Walter is a legend, what he has done for Rangers over both tenures has been amazing, but his time is coming to a close imo. Le Guen had a budget and never spent it all. Advocaats spending, Contracts given out by Eck/Bain and Walters lavish spending has caused this mess, but only 1 man authorised it all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaz76 0 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Of course it was worth it. I actually hoped we got 10 just like everbody at the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilstonloyal 186 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 this is a "spot te tim" poll if you ask me i agree with this guy. "wearethemighty" you must be a tim did u miss 9 in a row coz Father Gerry was houndin you son? dont ask fuckin silly questions n ull not get silly answers ya tit.AAAANNNNNNNNDDDDDDDDDDDDDd it was advocat that spent all the £££££££££££££££ plus big didy laff(at him)erty cost more that laudrup wtf?????PLG BOUGHT SEBO NO1 SHOULD GIVE HIM MONEY AGAIN!!!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,686 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 LOL, this is the biggest gap in a poll I have ever seen on RM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,768 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 and ho are the 4 trumpets that voted no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzas_Flute 11 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Does Rambo carry a knife ? There shouldn't even be a debate here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
salmon 1 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 correct me if im wrong but 9iar didnt cause our current state wee Dick did! Wee Dick didnt Mr Murray did, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flecky1 4 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 correct me if im wrong but 9iar didnt cause our current state wee Dick did! Wee Dick didnt Mr Murray did, Mr murray swallowed the shite wee Dick was feeding him and gave him millions upon millions to spend,of course Mr Murray is part to blame, no one is denying that, but Advocaat was the one buying the players he wanted, Murray doesnt scout players, he trusts his managers, obviously far too much going by the state we are in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mortos 8 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Absa-fucking-lutly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffbear 4,101 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 Of course it was........fuckin hell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mean_Gene_Okerlund 8 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 It was the ludicrous spending under Advocaat that got us into trouble. If we had realigned our priorities and started to build for the long-term at that point, the competition could have been permanently out of sight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iserdo 1 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 I see that there must be 2 lunatics on the board. Make that 7 mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomlin Bear 1 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 No it wasnt worth it. Winning league titles are shite and gettin 9 of them on the spin what a nightmare!!!!! FFS to this ridiculous "there is only 1 correct answer poll" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,684 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 Only a bheggar would ask a fcukin senseless question like this ? Fcuk Me thick as fcuk ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVB 2,560 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 Only a bheggar would ask a fcukin senseless question like this ? Fcuk Me thick as fcuk ! I was going to say the very same, but I thought I'd let someone else point out the obvious first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts