the sliver fox 1,672 Posted December 19, 2011 Share Posted December 19, 2011 I can agree that I could, or could not agree. But then again I may or may not disagree! It all depends on the time of the timing!I think I can see your point of view, if that is your point of view, if not then I can't agree to see your point of view, unless it is, I think! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 nothing in the retard. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Eh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rokcy 4 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 I would say the odds are stacked heavily in our favour.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8967002/Why-double-standards-by-HM-Revenue-and-Customs-mean-you-pay-more.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rambo1428 16 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 No mate something to do with Aston Villa going out the leauge cup by 2 goals I thought they won because the ultimate warrior scored 6 for villa? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussieranger 52 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 The dhims will have a sleepless nightthat'll make a change from laying in their pish stained beds (if they have one)GIRUYTOh it's great to be a PROD!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Anyone believing this unfounded rumour at this stage needs to waken up and give themselves a shake. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Anyone believing this unfounded rumour at this stage needs to waken up and give themselves a shake. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Hadji Spit RFC 733 Posted December 20, 2011 Author Share Posted December 20, 2011 Anyone believing this unfounded rumour at this stage needs to waken up and give themselves a shake.I appreciate that this is perhaps difficult for some to grasp but i can only assure the doubters that my source is very reliable and that for legal reasons i can't say more and would be morally wrong for me to do so. Again some may choose not to believe this but by saying no more at this stage i'm keeping my word with my source. Hope you all understand, I want nothing more than for this to be announced asap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 This thread is doing a grand job of noising up the tims.All these "guests" will be following this not quite sure if there is any truth in it.Many will be filling their pants.Maybe the OP didn't realise the impact this would have on the dark side. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 I appreciate that this is perhaps difficult for some to grasp but i can only assure the doubters that my source is very reliable and that for legal reasons i can't say more and would be morally wrong for me to do so. Again some may choose not to believe this but by saying no more at this stage i'm keeping my word with my source. Hope you all understand, I want nothing more than for this to be announced asap. It's not difficult for any of us to grasp - you claim that your source is "very reliable" and for "legal reasons" you cannot go further, well, knowing all that before you started the thread and given the amount of false dawns that have filled these and other message boards since the HMRC case came to the fore - what did you think the RM posters would do here? Applaud your strength of character in protecting your source? Of course not - with a message like that we all want that thing the Clatty Clan want at every turn....clarification.You should have kept it to your self until the time was right to tell the whole story (if indeed there is a 'whole story'?)It's attention seeking clap-trap until otherwise proved. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Rangers Tax Case blog hasn't had anything new to spin and distort for over a week, which is rare. Usually that Celtic-minded obsessive spins weather reports as proof of Rangers' impending doom. In fact, even his blogs from recent weeks are just "naw, they urnae!" complaints against press reports of discussions between HMRC (who of course never do deals like the one they did do with Arsenal, settling for £10m instead of the £300m they demanded) and Rangers.So perhaps he's got nothing to post or nothing that suits his agenda. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 A load of rubbish.why would Rangers settle out of court for £5M when they are not guilty of anything.I still believe we will pay nothing and Whyte already knows it and is just wanting the conformation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gid 46 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 This is my 300th post and is purely for the 100 odd tims watchingFor the past 3 years while watching the last game of the season Ive been able to make myself a sandwhich halfway during the first half coz the leagues been done and dusted whilst your hoping for a miracleScumbagsWhat kind of sandwich? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Hadji Spit RFC 733 Posted December 20, 2011 Author Share Posted December 20, 2011 It's not difficult for any of us to grasp - you claim that your source is "very reliable" and for "legal reasons" you cannot go further, well, knowing all that before you started the thread and given the amount of false dawns that have filled these and other message boards since the HMRC case came to the fore - what did you think the RM posters would do here? Applaud your strength of character in protecting your source? Of course not - with a message like that we all want that thing the Clatty Clan want at every turn....clarification.You should have kept it to your self until the time was right to tell the whole story (if indeed there is a 'whole story'?)It's attention seeking clap-trap until otherwise proved. Nope its passing on positive news bud, dry your eyes Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnberry18 3,204 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 It's not difficult for any of us to grasp - you claim that your source is "very reliable" and for "legal reasons" you cannot go further, well, knowing all that before you started the thread and given the amount of false dawns that have filled these and other message boards since the HMRC case came to the fore - what did you think the RM posters would do here? Applaud your strength of character in protecting your source? Of course not - with a message like that we all want that thing the Clatty Clan want at every turn....clarification.You should have kept it to your self until the time was right to tell the whole story (if indeed there is a 'whole story'?)It's attention seeking clap-trap until otherwise proved. Well said. I have never been worried about this tax case apart from when I first heard about it, but this post does quite ring true with me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Nope its passing on positive news bud, dry your eyesTell you what - PM me with your source - I'm a Mod (Kev told me) - I'll keep it secret...keep it safe (Lord Of The Rings quote just then). Like I said - you should have kept it to your good self until you were able to spill the whole tin of beans - there's nothing positive in your partial report. Yours, Kleenex in hand,CB Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertkay 39 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 I've head that they wrote it all off because we are loaning them Dorin Goian to their debt collections team In all seriousness, hope this is true Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skelf 1,153 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Tell you what - PM me with your source - I'm a Mod (Kev told me) - I'll keep it secret...keep it safe (Lord Of The Rings quote just then). Like I said - you should have kept it to your good self until you were able to spill the whole tin of beans - there's nothing positive in your partial report. Yours, Kleenex in hand,CB If he doesn't comply this thread should be locked Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Hadji Spit RFC 733 Posted December 20, 2011 Author Share Posted December 20, 2011 If he doesn't comply this thread should be lockedcomplied Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod1822 1 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Guess who!Does your source ware glasses? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figo 91 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 complied Well here's hoping your not having us on Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 El-hadji Any chance of you giving me a pm of your source ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod1822 1 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Does he have blonde hair? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianBacon 2,088 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 complied He has been in touch by PM - I'll stick up here what I told him in response;"El-Hadji Spit' has been in contact - and I am still awaiting further clarification".He didn't reveal his source (gave reasons why he didn't) - I respect that but it looks like the thread would be best locked (by another Admin, for fear of cries of "It's a stitch-up"!) as it's going around in circles without said clarification. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.