Sydney Super Cup Legal Action

[leam_baw 166]

5 minutes ago, JM1872 said:

Liam_baw defo a taig 

No, it’s actually because Wigan are my English team and I was a big fan of Leam Richardson who won promotion before he was sacked. You are a paranoid imbecile, Liam 😂 Fuckwit

[superallysbears 7,714]

These idiots are beyond stupid, it's as if they are not happy unless they've got some sort of litigation hanging over us, totally sick of our club being damaged by incompetence in the boardroom.

[RoboBearToo 386]

As has already been said, our next signing should be fucking Ally McBeal

[B1872 20,862]

Wonder how the current board will blame Dave King for this!

[GersInCanada 7,775]

Organisers are just trying to recoup some cash from what was for them a financial disaster. Doubt if we will end up paying anything. My memory may be faulty but as I recall scum jumped the gun and announced it as a done deal before we had agreed. Might have been a verbal agreement but that's all.

[Loyal72 11,581]

Well our court record suggests we're getting pumped again, genuinely as @ForeverAndEversays, the fact people were not sacked for first allowing this shitshow and then the mishandling of the fall out.

Our lawyers are pish. Yet we still use them too.

[The Specky Forum Organiser 65,316]

25 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

Organisers are just trying to recoup some cash from what was for them a financial disaster. Doubt if we will end up paying anything. My memory may be faulty but as I recall scum jumped the gun and announced it as a done deal before we had agreed. Might have been a verbal agreement but that's all.

Your memory is faulty, we had agreed to take part.

[Kylegib 516]

26 minutes ago, Loyal72 said:

Well our court record suggests we're getting pumped again, genuinely as @ForeverAndEversays, the fact people were not sacked for first allowing this shitshow and then the mishandling of the fall out.

Our lawyers are pish. Yet we still use them too.

Exactly and it's now likely to prove very costly as we must have agreed to take part before they started advertising it.

[LaaRFC 4,793]

In lieu of payment we should offer up Wilson to take a booting 

[GersInCanada 7,775]

3 minutes ago, The Specky Liar said:

Your memory is faulty, we had agreed to take part.

In principle the board would have agreed given the cash on offer but did pen ever hit paper. That's what I doubt.

[The Beast 9,242]

4 minutes ago, LaaRFC said:

In lieu of payment we should offer up Wilson to take a booting 

They enjoy tossing guys like him in Australia apparently.

[McEwan's Lager 30,690]

3 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

In principle the board would have agreed given the cash on offer but did pen ever hit paper. That's what I doubt.

 

[ElBufalo20 7,925]

1 hour ago, RoboBearToo said:

As has already been said, our next signing should be fucking Ally McBeal

Well we’ve already got the Mick Beale part

[GA1972 9,768]

10 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

In principle the board would have agreed given the cash on offer but did pen ever hit paper. That's what I doubt.

These idiots almost definitely signed everything in front of them as soon as cash was offered 

There cant be any other sporting organisation that ends up in court as often and unsuccessfully as we do 

[Johnnyem 238]

Just when things were beginning to look up, we get this shit!

Un Beale ieveable bad timing.

[GA1972 9,768]

Also who the fuck are our lawyers?  Real life versions of Jim Carrey in Liar Liar?

Absolutely useless as well 

[Loyal72 11,581]

1 minute ago, GA1972 said:

Also who the fuck are our lawyers?  Real life versions of Jim Carrey in Liar Liar?

Absolutely useless as well 

Jim Carrey won his fucking case. We've got Lionel Hutz.

[GersInCanada 7,775]

5 minutes ago, GA1972 said:

These idiots almost definitely signed everything in front of them as soon as cash was offered 

There cant be any other sporting organisation that ends up in court as often and unsuccessfully as we do 

I kind of agree with you. I don't know if the business world is different but if I sign a contract then there is a cooling off period (30 days?) when I can just cancel it.

[The Specky Forum Organiser 65,316]

19 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

In principle the board would have agreed given the cash on offer but did pen ever hit paper. That's what I doubt.

The club were literally selling tickets for it.

[Loyal72 11,581]

Hopefully our lawyers can argue the case Rangers supporters were dead against ever being involved in the competition from the off and would've refused tickets regardless.

Evidenced by on-field protests disrupting play during domestic league games, our supporters were willing to jeopardize the league to highlight that we were against this.

And that overall, this competition would not have benefited from Rangers' participation, in fact may have exasperated the situation.

But again, I've no faith in our legal team, constantly getting their arse handed back to them.

[The Specky Forum Organiser 65,316]

1 minute ago, Loyal72 said:

Hopefully our lawyers can argue the case Rangers supporters were dead against ever being involved in the competition from the off and would've refused tickets regardless.

Evidenced by on-field protests disrupting play during domestic league games, our supporters were willing to jeopardize the league to highlight that we were against this.

And that overall, this competition would not have benefited from Rangers' participation, in fact may have exasperated the situation.

But again, I've no faith in our legal team, constantly getting their arse handed back to them.

😂

Be as well just paying the money and no bothering going to court if that's the approach we take 

[Loyal72 11,581]

Just now, The Specky Liar said:

😂

Be as well just paying the money and no bothering going to court if that's the approach we take 

No other approach we can take. It's the only argument that we have. 

[Malkytfp1 18,656]

3 hours ago, leam_baw said:

Filled legal action in Federal Court against us. 
 

Surely we wouldn’t have signed any documents of agreement so this will be thrown out! 

A Fenian wanting to talk about court cases and legal action. Couldny make this shit up beast.

[SkylineBlue 23,743]

8 minutes ago, Loyal72 said:

Hopefully our lawyers can argue the case Rangers supporters were dead against ever being involved in the competition from the off and would've refused tickets regardless.

Evidenced by on-field protests disrupting play during domestic league games, our supporters were willing to jeopardize the league to highlight that we were against this.

And that overall, this competition would not have benefited from Rangers' participation, in fact may have exasperated the situation.

But again, I've no faith in our legal team, constantly getting their arse handed back to them.

I'm not sure " we made a total cunt of it so please let us off" is much of a defence. I have faith our legal team can put up a better defence than that.

[Loyal72 11,581]

3 minutes ago, SkylineBlue said:

I'm not sure " we made a total cunt of it so please let us off" is much of a defence. I have faith our legal team can put up a better defence than that.

😂 That's not at all what I said.

Supporters were boycotting regardless, if they're coming for damages etc they need to assert how much they are seeking in compensation.

That fee is diminished or rendered null if they'd have received no beneficial monies from Rangers fulfilling the agreed games.

Jesus are you dense?