BlueThunder 8,454 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 3 minutes ago, duffy2391 said: What is the source for this btw? Signal isn't great in work so can't load up all the previous pages. A Sky sports news broadcast today. Suspect it is a wind-up as The Sun mentioned it before the first leg but no-one else ran with it and Rangers must have known about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
markem 7,294 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Just now, BlueThunder said: A Sky sports news broadcast. Nowhere else mentioned it. Suspect it is a wind-up. What part of it do you think is a wind up mate? That he failed a drug test pending an outcome? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuggy 1,308 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 I remember one of theTim cases went to the Council for Arbitration of Sport. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loyal 136 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 10 minutes ago, Murty said: Last night was embarrassing enough, would rather we didn't lower ourselves even considering this. Would be harsh anyway if UEFA didn't approve it. Guy is having an asthma attack and they're supposed to try and get UEFA on the phone before they can treat him? No chance. he wasn't sanctioned too play regardless of his medical condition he was under investigation and shouldn't have been on the field Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers51 38 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 7 minutes ago, Copland bear said: The club should be all over and contacting UEFA as time is a killer here as the next game is a week tomorrow and things need to be organised. So the quicker they are into UEFA the better chance we would have of having them thrown out. Rules are rules and fuck fair play as if the shoe was on the other foot we would be thrown out Exactly, if it was us who fielded him do people really think other clubs would say its ok and let us through? How would the club even go about this or are they aware? Most other clubs fans would be on to uefa directly bombarding them with emails Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escobar 13,676 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Cyprus away ole ole Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 74,476 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 3-0 win, Waghorn hat-trick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 We back in yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shuggy 1,308 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Just now, STEPPS BOY said: 3-0 win, Waghorn hat-trick. Super, team finally gelling. :) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutton2008 646 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Just now, j1mgg said: We back in yet? We ain't getting back in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEE 4,880 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 1 minute ago, fanaticCR said: Cyprus away ole ole Cracked that already. Boys over here suggesting they got dispensation for him to play? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperSF 5,792 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 52 minutes ago, dummiesoot said: Martin Waghorn out of his strip? Heading down the chippy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sket 13,610 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 As if last night wasn't fucking embarrassing enough we now have people wishing this to be true. I'd be affronted if this happened. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWB72 1,531 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 They had a player booked twice in the first leg as well ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutton2008 646 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 The striker was/is eligible to play until after the results of the hearing in September. Why is this even a thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WGOH 2,344 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 1 minute ago, Hutton2008 said: The striker was/is eligible to play until after the results of the hearing in September. Why is this even a thread. I've read your posts and I think you're a taig. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers51 38 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 1 minute ago, Hutton2008 said: The striker was/is eligible to play until after the results of the hearing in September. Why is this even a thread. Where are u getting that info from? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueThunder 8,454 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 14 minutes ago, markem said: What part of it do you think is a wind up mate? That he failed a drug test pending an outcome? Like Hurton2008 says above, I think he was eligible. Someone has seen the story and pretended he was banned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueThunder 8,454 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 5 minutes ago, RWB72 said: They had a player booked twice in the first leg as well ? I had forgotten about that. Was that actually the case? Did he play last night Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers51 38 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 We d just like it cleared up. If uefa comment on it and say he was cleared to play then fair enough. But if he wasnt cleared then rules should be followed, retrospective clearence given now doesnt cut it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWB72 1,531 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, BlueThunder said: I had forgotten about that. Was that actually the case? Did he play last night Well according to the BBC all the players booked in the last game played in this one too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutton2008 646 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 6 minutes ago, WGOH said: I've read your posts and I think you're a taig. Sound. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueThunder 8,454 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 3 minutes ago, Rovers51 said: We d just like it cleared up. If uefa comment on it and say he was cleared to play then fair enough. But if he wasnt cleared then rules should be followed, retrospective clearence given now doesnt cut it. There isn't anything to clear up though. Nothing has been shown to say he was ineligible. This all started because of some Sky report earlier in the thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutton2008 646 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 The only rag running the story is the Sun and they are trying to deceive us. Read the content it clearly says he isn't banned pending hearing. He could be banned afterwards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers51 38 Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 Just now, BlueThunder said: There isn't anything to clear up though. Nothing has been shown to say he was ineligible. This all started because of some Sky report earlier in the thread. Fair enough and i take your point but what has being shown to say he was eligible to play by uefa or if they were aware? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts