Jump to content

Pressing v Counter


Ted E Bayer

Recommended Posts

celtic won yesterday fair and square. There's no doubt they were the better team, possession stats would suggest it was men against boys. We sat in and they played us off the park and so we all seem to agree. Pundits and celtic fans and some bears alike have us written off already.

However I disagree. Yes they have some good players and have been dominant for some time but let's be honest here they are not that good. We made them look good with the way we set up. The exact same way we set up in last seasons games.

If you sit back attempting to play the defend and contain game you will make any team look good. We gave them so much space and time on the ball to pick their passes and sat so deep we had to resort to long balls and clearances which lost us possession.

Press and close down and you force them to make mistakes. Hearts proved this already this season only a couple of weeks ago. They didn't look like superstars as they didn't give them the acres of space and plenty of time on the ball to pass around and work on wave after wave of attack.

Don't give me the 9 men long flight home pish, the defeat and the manner of it was purely down to how we set up. If on the next game the gaffer learns the lesson we will press, push them back, force them to make mistakes and we will show them that we are more than capable of pushing them all the way!

We did it in the 2-3 game back in March, the difference is we can defend now.

I truly hope we show them less respect in the next game and show them how good we can actually be!

WaTP

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ted E Bayer said:

celtic won yesterday fair and square. There's no doubt they were the better team, possession stats would suggest it was men against boys. We sat in and they played us off the park and so we all seem to agree. Pundits and celtic fans and some bears alike have us written off already.

However I disagree. Yes they have some good players and have been dominant for some time but let's be honest here they are not that good. We made them look good with the way we set up. The exact same way we set up in last seasons games.

If you sit back attempting to play the defend and contain game you will make any team look good. We gave them so much space and time on the ball to pick their passes and sat so deep we had to resort to long balls and clearances which lost us possession.

Press and close down and you force them to make mistakes. Hearts proved this already this season only a couple of weeks ago. They didn't look like superstars as they didn't give them the acres of space and plenty of time on the ball to pass around and work on wave after wave of attack.

Don't give me the 9 men long flight home pish, the defeat and the manner of it was purely down to how we set up. If on the next game the gaffer learns the lesson we will press, pish then back, force them to make mistakes and we will show them that we are more than capable of pushing them all the way!

We did it in the 2-3 game back in March, the difference is we can defend now.

I truly hope we show them less respect in the next game and show them how good we can actually be!

WaTP

Did you just finish watching the game?

This is all over the place in various threads.

We all know pressing them and getting i their faces is the way to rattle them and beat them.

The actual debate is whether we would have been able to have the fitness levels required yesterday to actually play that way especially with 9 of the 11 from the Ufa game starting.

I’m not worried or panicking for the rest of the season or the next time we play them unless we end up with 9 men < 72 hours before that match as well.

We’ll press them and we’ll beat them whether it’s at Ibrox or Hampden.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did hope we would play our own 4-3-3 pressing game and get a real sense of where we're at.  Sitting back and hoofing it long brought back memories of the McCoist days and getting beat like that is so disheartening.  The second half against Motherwell was exactly the same we're sitting too deep and just inviting pressure on to us.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BlueMe said:

The '9 men, long flight home pish' is the reason we set up the way we did, that's obvious.

If we set up the same way at Ibrox against them, then I'll start asking questions, but i can't see it.

We must've been tired during that second half against Motherwell as well.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TMB said:

There was pictures of the first-team sitting eating pancakes on Friday afternoon watching the EL draw.  They're professional athletes, who apparently had the most intense preseason ever to get them super fit, and had at least 48 hours of recovery prior to that Old Firm game.  Gerrard has a squad available to him so why didn't he use it if fitness was the concern?  Why wasn't Candeias on from the start?  Why weren't the substitutions made earlier if the players were so tired?  celtic dominated possession during that first half is it less tiring chasing the ball around than it is to press and hopefully have more possession of our own?

I don't buy in to this 'two tired' stuff at all.  Sitting back was a tactical decision.  Even if the players were tired they could've given a good 60mins, brung on the subs, and if Rangers tired out before the end THEN sit deep and boot it up the fucking park.  

Flying a 6 thousand mile round trip and playing an important European game with 9 men is mentally and physically exhausting, athlete or not. Sitting in a defensive formation and conserving as much energy as possible was the only option, Candeias should've been on from the start, i agree, but that still wouldn't change the tactics. 

Our subs were changing nothing in that game, even if they were fully fit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TMB said:

There was pictures of the first-team sitting eating pancakes on Friday afternoon watching the EL draw.  They're professional athletes, who apparently had the most intense preseason ever to get them super fit, and had at least 48 hours of recovery prior to that Old Firm game.  Gerrard has a squad available to him so why didn't he use it if fitness was the concern?  Why wasn't Candeias on from the start?  Why weren't the substitutions made earlier if the players were so tired?  celtic dominated possession during that first half is it less tiring chasing the ball around than it is to press and hopefully have more possession of our own?

I don't buy in to this 'two tired' stuff at all.  Sitting back was a tactical decision.  Even if the players were tired they could've given a good 60mins, brung on the subs, and if Rangers tired out before the end THEN sit deep and boot it up the fucking park.  

I guess we’ll never know and I’m not saying he was right to elect to sit deep whether it was tactical or based on fitness it didn’t work over the 90.

The pancakes remark is laughable, you do know athletes have a huge intake of calories since they burn off so much, it’s not all going to come in the form of apples and oranges. It’s no like he had a six pack of beer and a kebab :lol:

The manager also made mistakes keeping ejaria on when he was fucked so perhaps the fitness part wasn’t behind his tactics because if he was concerned about it so much he’d have brought ejaria off at half time when he was done.

I think there was an element of sounding them out and seeing what they had to offer before upping our game which isn’t the right thing to do.

I hope he has learnt his lesson to not sit in against teams domestically. We are Rangers and should go for the kill at all times domestically as I now think we are better than the 10 and as close as we’ve been to the scum in a long time.

If that means we need to rotate more then rotate more. He has made a few mistakes domestically but has done a great job in Europe so hopefully he’ll start to get things sorted on the training ground over the next few weeks and then put 5 past Dundee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TMB said:

We must've been tired during that second half against Motherwell as well.  

 

352 fucked us in that game imo, not tiredness. 

That formation was a mistake, but again, i can see why Gerrard chose to play it, he wanted to match up to Motherwell, and it was 30 seconds away from working out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TMB said:

I did hope we would play our own 4-3-3 pressing game and get a real sense of where we're at.  Sitting back and hoofing it long brought back memories of the McCoist days and getting beat like that is so disheartening.  The second half against Motherwell was exactly the same we're sitting too deep and just inviting pressure on to us.  

I believe if we do we'll get the kind of result we all want. In all honesty I would rather lose narrowly by paying a high tempo pressing game than the way we lost yesterday with backs against the wall for 90 minutes. Our set up made them look far superior which simply isn't the case at all.

I can't see them beating us if we play an aggressive attacking pressing style.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TMB said:

Even if the players were tired they could've given a good 60mins

Don't think you've fully grasped what 'tired' means in this particular context. It means they couldn't press for 60mins, otherwise they would have.

You don't yell 'get it into your heads NOW' on the training ground then suddenly decide 'actually,  see those drills and instructions that i've drummed into you these past 3 months, forget all that against our biggest rivals, i think we should take it easy for a change and not show them what we are capable of!'

How do i know that couldnt press? Because they all wear these black bra type things.  https://www.playertek.com/gb/playertek/

Even a half wit can look at the resulting graphics these things throw up instantly arrive at the conclusion 'yep, he's burst'.

Saying 'they should have stuck Candeais on' isn't a great argument. He was an ever present in the absolute horsings last season.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imo we set up with the press and the freshest players possible and see what we can get in the first 45. If it didn’t work fair enough start shutting up shop if they’re tired after 60 mins. 

I believe if we did press them we would’ve went in winning at half time and the players would’ve dug in deeper than before to see it out. 

It sent out the totally wrong message to the players and fans sitting that deep, it really was bordering on embarrassing. It was essentially us saying, we respect the amazing tarriers, please don’t batter us again. If that kind of mentality creeps into the players and worse the manager then we’re fucked every single time we play them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, the old guard said:

Do both and mix it up, it's hard to press for 90 mins, need to work on it and get a better game management, but constant long balls back to front just won't do. 

Especially when most of those long balls weren't even aimed at a Rangers player but rather hoofed away to clear our lines and in turn giving them back possession to start the next embarrassing wave of attack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BlueMe said:

I'm fucked after a 3 hour flight to spain tbh.

 

Why is everyone fucked after a flight?

I go away most years, been on a few long hall flights, all in economy and I'm never so fucked that it would affect me from performing at the highest level wearing the Royal blue!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
×
×
  • Create New...