Bears r us 30,797 Posted February 9, 2019 Share Posted February 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said: So the bottom of the fouls committed table is St Johnstone and the scum only 4 fouls separate them but St Johnstone have 40 yellow cards and the scum have only 23. Aye but there’s nothing dodgy going on. Some very interesting stats that is for sure. Courtyard Bear, Sweetheart and BLUEDIGNITY 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie0202 12,272 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Edit. I think the daily record are fucking about with their dates on their articles so I've removed the link I had posted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 His compliance hearing today then? Edit. It's tomorrow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooperSF 5,792 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 2 hours ago, Laudrup1984 said: I hope it was so that we could finish off the animations of our PowerPoint. Bluekev and cushynumber 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached:Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player. If McGregor is found guilty, then it's officially corrupt. Straight to CAS. And fwiw, I think he will be done for it. Sweetheart 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 6 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached:Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player. If McGregor is found guilty, then it's officially corrupt. Straight to CAS. And fwiw, I think he will be done for it. Ref is staring right at the action there ffs ,they bams change it to suit their own agenda ,even mcinnes never mentioned it ffs Bears r us and Sweetheart 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverInBlue 31 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 He was always getting banned. Not the 1st time le has left the boot in Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,647 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 6 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: His compliance hearing today then? Edit. It's tomorrow. If power doesn't get cited its easy for Rangers show them that picture Then show them this Tell them that if McGregor is a red and this aint then regardless of any decision Allan will be playing come Saturday at 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Deacon 55,215 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 37 minutes ago, KingKirk said: If power doesn't get cited its easy for Rangers show them that picture Then show them this Tell them that if McGregor is a red and this aint then regardless of any decision Allan will be playing come Saturday at 3 Power gets nothing Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prso's headband 35,456 Posted February 12, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted February 12, 2019 We have 2 strong sides of the argument here. It’s a clear agenda because Madden has clearly seen the incident. Powers kick to the head is deemed a yellow, therefore how can McGregors be a 2 match ban? Bears r us, BridgeIsBlue, Bristol loyal and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowX 146 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Can’t see him being in a hurry to want to play for Scotland again if he doesn’t win the appeal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 This particular animal will be at it again soon in the cup game . It's what he does, but that's ok. The cards are now seriously stacked against Morelos when we go back up there after disposing of Kilmarnock. I wan't him playing his normal game, in amongst it and IF he he get's a red under dubious circumstances, then the club need to go to war, or it's game over for us. elliotblu and Negri's lovechild 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,837 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 On 08/02/2019 at 13:24, Jamie0202 said: 4 hours ago, Laudrup1984 said: Why the delay? Is liewell too busy to call the CO with his decision today? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
East Enclosure Row N 2,823 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 I believe still photograph evidence is not admissible as it does not show the alleged offence in context. ie; movements immediately before and afterwards. Footage has to be direct from a "reputable" source - which does not include YouTube. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brackley 1,401 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Notice that the photos in the press reporting the decision are now a second or so later showing the boot at waist height or Ryan Jack on the deck. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 Delaying the appeal 24 hours seems to imply we may have been awaiting the outcome of the Power incident. 10pshortof17pound, Prso's headband and Sweetheart 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomatasauce 1,253 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 50 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said: Delaying the appeal 24 hours seems to imply we may have been awaiting the outcome of the Power incident. I think we’re waiting on Micheal Stewart and his biomechanical explanation, to bail us out. BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT, Laudrup1984 and Junior Soprano 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
10pshortof17pound 2,493 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 12 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said: Delaying the appeal 24 hours seems to imply we may have been awaiting the outcome of the Power incident. Whatever our argument for McGregor's citing to be overturned could only be strengthened by this decision - was never guaranteed, but worth requesting the 24 hour extension - as it now happens, McGregor may still get the ban, but how on earth can it be justified. Sufficient grounds for openly questioning the Compliance Officer role and obvious bias against any Rangers related referral. Laudrup1984, elliotblu and Bluekev 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandyinroyalblue 16,478 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 If his ban is upheld I hope he retires from international football,being petty can work both ways. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 45 minutes ago, 10pshortof17pound said: Whatever our argument for McGregor's citing to be overturned could only be strengthened by this decision - was never guaranteed, but worth requesting the 24 hour extension - as it now happens, McGregor may still get the ban, but how on earth can it be justified. Sufficient grounds for openly questioning the Compliance Officer role and obvious bias against any Rangers related referral. If McGregor ban is upheld, could the club be getting ready to take this further? The 24 hour delay suggests something is going on behind the scenes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached:Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player. Despite the above not being the case, I fully expect ban to be upheld. Bears 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Not sure if anyone has seen it but here's the St Mirren one Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,723 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Just now, Laudrup1984 said: Not sure if anyone has seen it but here's the St Mirren one An absolute shocker. Laudrup1984 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said: An absolute shocker. Apparently the same referee who claimed but didn't actually see Candeias blowing a kiss thinks both incidents equal the same punishment! Bears 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.