Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bigsasasfloopyhair

***** The Official Porto v Rangers Match Thread *****

Recommended Posts


Clean sheet in needed,somehow.

I'll be a contentious bassa and play Edmunson,Goldson,Katic and Helander acrss the back,pushing Tav(if played) and Barisic up to make a 4 acrss the middle wi Davis and Jack central and Kent behind Morelos.

mark1963 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Blumhoilann said:

Clean sheet in needed,somehow.

I'll be a contentious bassa and play Edmunson,Goldson,Katic and Helander acrss the back,pushing Tav(if played) and Barisic up to make a 4 acrss the middle wi Davis and Jack central and Kent behind Morelos.

Is that you McInnes? Love a 6 defender system.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Blumhoilann said:

Clean sheet in needed,somehow.

I'll be a contentious bassa and play Edmunson,Goldson,Katic and Helander acrss the back,pushing Tav(if played) and Barisic up to make a 4 acrss the middle wi Davis and Jack central and Kent behind Morelos.

RecentComplexIcefish-small.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Blumhoilann said:

Clean sheet in needed,somehow.

I'll be a contentious bassa and play Edmunson,Goldson,Katic and Helander acrss the back,pushing Tav(if played) and Barisic up to make a 4 acrss the middle wi Davis and Jack central and Kent behind Morelos.

I'd go for a Levein special and put Arfield in the centre of the mid field and put Morelos on the bench. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do folk want to see 3 at the back? We tried it and we were all over the place. Now boys want to try it away to the best team in our Europa group, haha Jesus wept.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bluenose-11 said:

Why do folk want to see 3 at the back? We tried it and we were all over the place. Now boys want to try it away to the best team in our Europa group, haha Jesus wept.

It would be madness to try it away to porto. 

But it shouldn't be ruled out for future games down the line. 

Last time I remember we tried 3 at the back was vs Motherwell. Flanagan was one of the 3 cbs that day.

We've got some much better options at the back now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Its Saturday onto Sunday the clocks change mate.

hehehehehe

F111D13A-0FC6-4BD2-BCAA-0DEF89083208.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can’t see it being a pumping. Wouldn’t shock me to see us leave there with a draw. 

We can compete against anyone we’ll face this season, just aren’t consistent enough against the jabronis in the SPFL. 

Fancy a score draw. 

Vanoli likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting excited for this now. We play some of our best football in Europe. Players like Kamara, Aribo and even Ojo are more effective on the European stage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SG: The only two missing are Jordan Jones, and Andy King who has a small muscle problem. The rest are fit and healthy.

 

That means Jack plays. Good news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Blumhoilann said:

Clean sheet in needed,somehow.

I'll be a contentious bassa and play Edmunson,Goldson,Katic and Helander acrss the back,pushing Tav(if played) and Barisic up to make a 4 acrss the middle wi Davis and Jack central and Kent behind Morelos.

Not a time to be fidgeting with things. Leave it alone will you 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Up against very good opposition tomorrow night so our boys will need to be at it. Hope we can take something from the game. Anybody know our away allocation for this, I seem to have missed it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, JackAlex93 said:

Up against very good opposition tomorrow night so our boys will need to be at it. Hope we can take something from the game. Anybody know our away allocation for this, I seem to have missed it? 

Hearing it's either 132 or 157

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...