Inigo 32,532 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Thoughts?http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/6024-mitchell-leaves-clubI'm a bit disappointed after last years showings. I thought he had shown up pretty well, but I suppose the cuts have to be made. I'm sure many would have preferred him to have stayed rather than Foster, but I suppose Mitchell's easier to get rid of. First of several more, perhaps? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
willygers4life 1,031 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Saving 6 months wages what about 20k saving, could done a job till back up too, Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackyBear 16 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 He's shite! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Blue 9,356 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 I'm all for giving the youth a chance and combining experience with the youth in having a longer term goal e.g. avoid signings like Smith, Simonsen and Foster. However, I just don't think he was good enough so a waste of wages and better out the door. First of many I hope as it's ridiculous that we've a bigger squad than the Mhanks. Let's just hope these players aren't getting paid off then he's yet another one with no sell on fee. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,006 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Would have preferred smith or foster to go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackyBear 16 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Would have preferred smith or foster to go.Much harder to get rid of players on higher wages! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Another pointless contract given out Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,006 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Much harder to get rid of players on higher wages!Indeed still I am allowed an opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottBF2 3,540 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 He wasn't going to get a chance, no matter how well he played. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straight-Edge-Loyal 6,686 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Indeed still I am allowed an opinion.No your not Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Good luck wherever you end up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcbear 10,913 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 He looked half tidy at fullback, not so clever higher up the park. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 First of many to go, good luck Andy you never let us down and you can always say you played for Rangers Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Blue 9,356 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Let's face it, he's not that good but certainly not the worst in the squad. Disappointing that another window comes along and we need to get rid of deadwood with no chance of any income from them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 As long as its the start of many then fine. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Negri's Beard 1,423 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Would have been released in the summer anyway. Right decision. Decent lad but not very good. Best of luck to him Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tam watp 77 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Best of luck to him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Another pointless contract given outCorrect, same as Naismith & Cole. Bonkers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
there'sonlyoneamoruso 1,724 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Another pointless contract given outTrue. So that is three of the youths that got new contracts that have been released why extended their contracts if they weren't good enough?Having said that good luck to Mitchell as a fellow Ulsterman I hope he does well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bydo 3,215 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Let's never forget the guys who stayed on, no matter how shite/good they are. Bottom line, they were our whole team at one point, and without them we'd have never survived.Good luck Andy! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Correct, same as Naismith & Cole. Bonkers.Hopefully the kind of practice Wallace will put a stop to Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Williamson. 82,224 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Meh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FernandoR20 2,133 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Meh Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasa_Papac_No1_Fan 605 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 True. So that is three of the youths that got new contracts that have been released why extended their contracts if they weren't good enough?Having said that good luck to Mitchell as a fellow Ulsterman I hope he does well.But if we didn't give them contracts and they left and we replaced them with better players all of us would moan about not giving them a year contract. Double standards would come into place.In other words, good luck to Mitchell. When he was called on to play games, he was a consistent player but not good enough to keep the position down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbo 588 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 I wonder if by letting him go we had to pay out the remainder of his contract (albeit it only six months) or whether we came to a deal with him to save us money.If it's the latter then that's good news - money saved. As I've said before we need to not give out stupid contract extensions as we approach that summer.That means waving bye to Hutton, Cribari and Simonsen who are surplus to requirements on the football side of things anyhow Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.