Jump to content

All Barton Chat.


theiconicman

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, millsygers44 said:

I think the manager should be there and find it poor that he is not

Nothing to do with Mark Warburton at this point. Only the board can make a decision over his future. 

Weir and Warburton would be there to comment on his attitude and work rate. His attitude is already well documented and his work rate for us is non existent because he hasn't been with us for ages. so it'd be pointless for them to be there.

Stop grasping at straws to hate on the Manager or at least get a proper criticism on him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, RFCRobertson said:

Nothing to do with Mark Warburton at this point. Only the board can make a decision over his future. 

Weir and Warburton would be there to comment on his attitude and work rate. His attitude is already well documented and his work rate for us is non existent because he hasn't been with us for ages. so it'd be pointless for them to be there.

Stop grasping at straws to hate on the Manager. 

Think it is to do with manager mate he started this whole ball rolling ... betting is being used to fulfill the managers wishes 

I think if a rangers manager wanted rid of a player he should be man enough to face him and do it himself

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RFCRobertson said:

Nothing to do with Mark Warburton at this point. Only the board can make a decision over his future. 

Weir and Warburton would be there to comment on his attitude and work rate. His attitude is already well documented and his work rate for us is non existent because he hasn't been with us for ages. so it'd be pointless for them to be there.

Stop grasping at straws to hate on the Manager or at least get a proper criticism on him. 

millsygers44, that makes him 72, don't be too harsh on the poster - just a bit senile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RFCRobertson said:

Nothing to do with Mark Warburton at this point. Only the board can make a decision over his future. 

Weir and Warburton would be there to comment on his attitude and work rate. His attitude is already well documented and his work rate for us is non existent because he hasn't been with us for ages. so it'd be pointless for them to be there.

Stop grasping at straws to hate on the Manager or at least get a proper criticism on him. 

millsygers44, that makes him 72, don't be too harsh on the poster - just a bit senile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, millsygers44 said:

Think it is to do with manager mate he started this whole ball rolling ... betting is being used to fulfill the managers wishes 

I think if a rangers manager wanted rid of a player he should be man enough to face him and do it himself

Not at all to do with Mark Warburton. Warburton has the power to keep him away from the training ground but he doesn't have the power to sack a player. 

and at that, Warburton is only reacting to Barton being a bit of a cunt. So it's Barton's own fault he's in this position. 

Again, Mark Warburton doesn't have any power when it comes to sacking players. Get your facts right you stupid idiot. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jelavic191 said:

We are absolutely leaderless on the park. We could be doing with him just now, would the rest of the squad welcome him back though? 

they'd have to be professional i guess, but again we are assuming a bit too much. who says the squad don't like him, or even part of the squad don't like him?

all we've had is rumour and that's it 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RFCRobertson said:

Not at all to do with Mark Warburton. Warburton has the power to keep him away from the training ground but he doesn't have the power to sack a player. 

and at that, Warburton is only reacting to Barton being a bit of a cunt. So it's Barton's own fault he's in this position. 

Again, Mark Warburton doesn't have any power when it comes to sacking players. Get your facts right you stupid idiot. 

Resort to name calling when someone doesn't agree with you embarrassing any manager has the power to SACK a player you just don't pick them tell them to train with reserves (thousands of examples) you don't turn it into a sideshow and circus it has become with bans further bans etc you deal with it head on 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, millsygers44 said:

Resort to name calling when someone doesn't agree with you embarrassing any manager has the power to SACK a player you just don't pick them tell them to train with reserves (thousands of examples) you don't turn it into a sideshow and circus it has become with bans further bans etc you deal with it head on 

Resorting to name calling cause you're being a stupid idiot who doesn't know what he's on about. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Misteral said:

I expect he will only stay if 1, MW is leaving and 2. the board know it will not go down badly with the squad if he does stay.  If he's still in there now after and hour and a quarter they will be trying to thrash out an exit package

Over an hour now since this meeting started with still no sign of barton. I agree.....package being discussed for him to exit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...