MacBoyd 5,438 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 They might not know the evidence that I hope we have Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,643 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Just now, MacBoyd said: Surely even if they vote yes right now, nothing can then happen till the 28 day period ends incase someone wants to change the other way. You can't change a yes vote only a no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,006 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, MacBoyd said: Surely even if they vote yes right now, nothing can then happen till the 28 day period ends incase someone wants to change the other way. They cant go YES to NO according to spfl rules but can go the other way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 What have Partick Thistle said? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,643 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, backup said: Not being aware/knowing of our concerns ? Ffs it's no hearts job to tell cunts what they no about the evidence Rangers have ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amato 3,016 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Just now, dummiesoot said: They cant go YES to NO according to spfl rules but can go the other way Apparently it's company law, a vote in favour of a resolution can't be withdrawn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,909 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 6 minutes ago, ricksen_da_best said: This is what we don’t need, especially from a group that gets quoted in the papers regularly. I think what they’re saying is Hearts lying too as in folk saying Rangers lying then are Hearts also lying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie 12,905 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, KingKirk said: You can't change a yes vote only a no And only if it didn’t arrive in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,643 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Following today’s SPFL announcement, Partick Thistle FC will simply not accept this proposal as it stands. We believe that the proposal requires significantly more discussion, scrutiny and debate before any vote can be taken. We are now engaging with others to amend the proposal to identify a fairer and more equitable solution to address a number of inequalities it throws up. At an unprecedented time for football, we believe that it doesn’t meet the basic principle that no club should be left worse off by this important decision. It also seems to link acceptance of the proposal before payments can be made to hard-pressed clubs but, in our opinion, the two things do not need to be linked. Money to clubs is a priority, the proposal could be debated in slower time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterC 12,270 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, KingKirk said: Following today’s SPFL announcement, Partick Thistle FC will simply not accept this proposal as it stands. We believe that the proposal requires significantly more discussion, scrutiny and debate before any vote can be taken. We are now engaging with others to amend the proposal to identify a fairer and more equitable solution to address a number of inequalities it throws up. At an unprecedented time for football, we believe that it doesn’t meet the basic principle that no club should be left worse off by this important decision. It also seems to link acceptance of the proposal before payments can be made to hard-pressed clubs but, in our opinion, the two things do not need to be linked. Money to clubs is a priority, the proposal could be debated in slower time. Good statement from the Maryhill Magyars Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,909 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, Dave Hedgehog said: What have Partick Thistle said? Football unable to resume at Firhill as they’ve ran out of quinoa for Half Time eating. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,702 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, KingKirk said: Following today’s SPFL announcement, Partick Thistle FC will simply not accept this proposal as it stands. We believe that the proposal requires significantly more discussion, scrutiny and debate before any vote can be taken. We are now engaging with others to amend the proposal to identify a fairer and more equitable solution to address a number of inequalities it throws up. At an unprecedented time for football, we believe that it doesn’t meet the basic principle that no club should be left worse off by this important decision. It also seems to link acceptance of the proposal before payments can be made to hard-pressed clubs but, in our opinion, the two things do not need to be linked. Money to clubs is a priority, the proposal could be debated in slower time. I guess there is no mention of the evidence the Rangers board has. Much like East Fife and Hearts. Interesting that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paisley Blue Loyal 11,178 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Just now, esquire8 said: I guess there is no mention of the evidence the Rangers board has. Much like East Fife and Hearts. Interesting that. Interesting in what way mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueThunder 8,453 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 22 minutes ago, HG5 said: As we have now been informed, what the league says re ‘uncertainty & financial hardship’ doesn’t appear to be the case... Yup, although I’m beginning to wonder if clubs knew about the loan ability but chose not to ask for one. Whatever way you slice it, the SPFL tried to force this through for financial reasons that could have been alleviated by the loans. 16 minutes ago, backup said: do we have anyone we can trust ? 10 minutes ago, backup said: Not being aware/knowing of our concerns ? Hearts only said they didn’t know what our “proof” is. At least that is how I read it. I think the first line in that tweet should have a question mark, not an exclamation mark. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,702 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Has Caley Thistle released a statement yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 11 minutes ago, Lord Lockin said: Just been reading Ann Budge statement, Rangers proposal bombed out because it contained the word "Instructed" the word according to the SPFL should have been "Requested" fuckin hell It’s only these bent fucks that do the instructing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amato 3,016 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, esquire8 said: I guess there is no mention of the evidence the Rangers board has. Much like East Fife and Hearts. Interesting that. What you getting at? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,702 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Just now, Paisley Blue Loyal said: Interesting in what way mate Just think its interesting that despite our statement being out there and the SPFL chairman statement out there talking about evidence of corruption there is no mention of it in anyone else's. Thats all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djwyc14 116 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 hour ago, eejay the dj said: It could be the last desperate act . Get it over the line and LIEWELL tell all his media puppets to ramp up 9 in a row This will happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie1963 2,352 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 10 minutes ago, Dave Hedgehog said: What have Partick Thistle said? I cant copy and paste. Hopeless. In a nutshell it's a crock. Wont stand for. Why link league call and money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Support_The_Troops 89 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Could Rangers not scrap there vote and wait the 28 days before submitting it meaning nothing can be done until all votes are cast ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 10 minutes ago, MacBoyd said: How do you know that Because budge said so in her statement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacBoyd 5,438 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 7 minutes ago, Amato said: Apparently it's company law, a vote in favour of a resolution can't be withdrawn Ah right I honestly thought those replies I got were piss takes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amato 3,016 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Support_The_Troops said: Could Rangers not scrap there vote and wait the 28 days before submitting it meaning nothing can be done until all votes are cast ? Don't think it would make a difference as they already have sufficient "yes" votes in Premier League Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacBoyd 5,438 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, esquire8 said: Just think its interesting that despite our statement being out there and the SPFL chairman statement out there talking about evidence of corruption there is no mention of it in anyone else's. Thats all. Yeah I'm with you here. We better have solid proof. Remember the lurgan bigot got off with calling vlad a gypsy in the ibrox tunnel because the speakers on the CCTV didnt work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.