Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent

[HG5 11,134]

3 minutes ago, magic8ball said:

We did fulfill the license requirements ,there was tax owed at the time of the license as with all businesses but the tarrier keyboard warriors have twisted this over the years ,doesn’t matter if it became a debt ,it wasn’t overdue at the time ,all debts start somewhere 

I’m sure we did mate - hence the speech marks in my post re their claim i.e. I think it’s bogus.

Moonhowling, which they appear to have splashed a load of cash at.

[bluenoz 30,918]

2 minutes ago, Ned Ryerson said:

I've met big DJ socially a few times. He's a top bloke. Staunch as fuck.

For the life of me, I will never forget that goal. I was only 8. He was 16.

[doc holliday 1,653]

The 4 Rangers Demands To The SPFL

 

Rangers switched tactics in their bid for an independent inquiry into votergate – by adding Murdoch MacLennan to their SPFL hitlist.

Chairman Douglas Park and the Ibrox club also aim to use the the league’s own rules against 
them – by turning whistleblower on the men they claim have brought the game into disrepute.

MailSport can reveal exclusively details of an explosive letter sent by Park to league supremo 
MacLennan in the wake of last week’s vote to end the season.

Having already called for the 
suspension of chief executive Neil Doncaster and legal advisor Rod McKenzie, Rangers now have deep reservations over MacLennan’s impartiality.

In the strongly worded letter in response to the SPFL chairman demanding to see any evidence of wrongdoing, Park:

#  Says he WON’T provide evidence unless MacLennan, Doncaster and McKenzie aren’t involved.

#  Wants a copy of the league’s
 official whistleblower policy so the trio can’t have access to it.

#  Demands McLennan explains derogatory comments he made about Rangers in the past.

#  Accuses him of attempting to shut down the club’s concerns by 
denying them free speech.

 

Rangers are adamant they have information which shows the
process of the resolution vote to be flawed, as well as calling the
governance and integrity of the SPFL into question.

But they won’t hand it over while Doncaster and MacLennan are still at the helm of the organisation.

In his letter, designed to heap more pressure on the SPFL hierarchy, Park says: “An initial request to share the evidence we hold came from one of the individuals (McKenzie) we’re seeking to have independently investigated and it would therefore have been wholly inappropriate to provide it in those circumstances.

“Rangers will readily share all of the information and evidence it has amassed with a properly constituted independent investigation.”

Gers want to know who they can take evidence to, given the conflicts of interest surrounding the trio.

Park also hit out at MacLennan, saying: “Can you provide Rangers with a copy of your organisation’s whistleblower’s policy, as an initial step towards establishing the framework for an investigation?”

Park also wants answers from MacLennan on anti-Rangers 
comments he allegedly made when he took up his position in 2017.

In the letter circulated to all 42 clubs, he said: “It has been widely reported that you have previously made your attitude towards
Rangers Football Club known. There has been no explanation for, or denial of, these remarks.

“It must be clear to you why, in the absence of an explanation of denial, Rangers can have no faith in your impartiality.”

The only ways Rangers can get an independent inquiry is for it to be either granted by the SPFL board or if three clubs call for an EGM and it gets 75 per cent approval in a vote.

 

Sunday Mail

 

 

 

 

[magic8ball 27,901]

1 hour ago, Junior Soprano said:

Barry Ferguson should get a belt taken off his jaw. Odd how foreign captains have our backs mor than these fucks.

You don’t even have to look at captains ,you would struggle to find any foreign ex player speak the way the Ferguson’s do ,Just look at Marco Negri ffs ,fair enough he scored a shit load of goals early on but in general his whole Rangers career he was a moody cunt who didn’t give a fuck ,look at him now over here at fund raisers etc on a regular basis ,

And can you think of any ex taig player who speaks the way the brothers grim speak in fact you would struggle to find any ex player of any team anywhere act the way these cunts do 

[HG5 11,134]

2 minutes ago, doc holliday said:

The 4 Rangers Demands To The SPFL

 

Rangers switched tactics in their bid for an independent inquiry into votergate – by adding Murdoch MacLennan to their SPFL hitlist.

Chairman Douglas Park and the Ibrox club also aim to use the the league’s own rules against 
them – by turning whistleblower on the men they claim have brought the game into disrepute.

MailSport can reveal exclusively details of an explosive letter sent by Park to league supremo 
MacLennan in the wake of last week’s vote to end the season.

Having already called for the 
suspension of chief executive Neil Doncaster and legal advisor Rod McKenzie, Rangers now have deep reservations over MacLennan’s impartiality.

In the strongly worded letter in response to the SPFL chairman demanding to see any evidence of wrongdoing, Park:

#says he WON’T provide evidence unless MacLennan, Doncaster and McKenzie aren’t involved.

#wants a copy of the league’s
 official whistleblower policy so the trio can’t have access to it.

#demands McLennan explains derogatory comments he made about Rangers in the past.

#accuses him of attempting to shut down the club’s concerns by 
denying them free speech.

 

Rangers are adamant they have information which shows the
process of the resolution vote to be flawed, as well as calling the
governance and integrity of the SPFL into question.

But they won’t hand it over while Doncaster and MacLennan are still at the helm of the organisation.

In his letter, designed to heap more pressure on the SPFL hierarchy, Park says: “An initial request to share the evidence we hold came from one of the individuals (McKenzie) we’re seeking to have independently investigated and it would therefore have been wholly inappropriate to provide it in those circumstances.

“Rangers will readily share all of the information and evidence it has amassed with a properly constituted independent investigation.”

Gers want to know who they can take evidence to, given the conflicts of interest surrounding the trio.

Park also hit out at MacLennan, saying: “Can you provide Rangers with a copy of your organisation’s whistleblower’s policy, as an initial step towards establishing the framework for an investigation?”

Park also wants answers from MacLennan on anti-Rangers 
comments he allegedly made when he took up his position in 2017.

138259102799

In the letter circulated to all 42 clubs, he said: “It has been widely reported that you have previously made your attitude towards
Rangers Football Club known. There has been no explanation for, or denial of, these remarks.

“It must be clear to you why, in the absence of an explanation of denial, Rangers can have no faith in your impartiality.”

The only ways Rangers can get an independent inquiry is for it to be either granted by the SPFL board or if three clubs call for an EGM and it gets 75 per cent approval in a vote.

 

Daily Record.

 

 

 

 

That’s slightly positive - at least it outlines a mechanism for calling for an independent inquiry.

Getting enough onside to win the vote may be an issue though.

[MoodyBlue1872 3,078]

Nothing really new in the Sunday Liam stuff.

[Quiet Jim 897]

1 hour ago, MacBoyd said:

Can anyone explain what article 12 actually is 

Dead

[bluenoz 30,918]

5 minutes ago, doc holliday said:

The 4 Rangers Demands To The SPFL

 

Rangers switched tactics in their bid for an independent inquiry into votergate – by adding Murdoch MacLennan to their SPFL hitlist.

Chairman Douglas Park and the Ibrox club also aim to use the the league’s own rules against 
them – by turning whistleblower on the men they claim have brought the game into disrepute.

MailSport can reveal exclusively details of an explosive letter sent by Park to league supremo 
MacLennan in the wake of last week’s vote to end the season.

Having already called for the 
suspension of chief executive Neil Doncaster and legal advisor Rod McKenzie, Rangers now have deep reservations over MacLennan’s impartiality.

In the strongly worded letter in response to the SPFL chairman demanding to see any evidence of wrongdoing, Park:

#says he WON’T provide evidence unless MacLennan, Doncaster and McKenzie aren’t involved.

#wants a copy of the league’s
 official whistleblower policy so the trio can’t have access to it.

#demands McLennan explains derogatory comments he made about Rangers in the past.

#accuses him of attempting to shut down the club’s concerns by 
denying them free speech.

 

Rangers are adamant they have information which shows the
process of the resolution vote to be flawed, as well as calling the
governance and integrity of the SPFL into question.

But they won’t hand it over while Doncaster and MacLennan are still at the helm of the organisation.

In his letter, designed to heap more pressure on the SPFL hierarchy, Park says: “An initial request to share the evidence we hold came from one of the individuals (McKenzie) we’re seeking to have independently investigated and it would therefore have been wholly inappropriate to provide it in those circumstances.

“Rangers will readily share all of the information and evidence it has amassed with a properly constituted independent investigation.”

Gers want to know who they can take evidence to, given the conflicts of interest surrounding the trio.

Park also hit out at MacLennan, saying: “Can you provide Rangers with a copy of your organisation’s whistleblower’s policy, as an initial step towards establishing the framework for an investigation?”

Park also wants answers from MacLennan on anti-Rangers 
comments he allegedly made when he took up his position in 2017.

138259102799

In the letter circulated to all 42 clubs, he said: “It has been widely reported that you have previously made your attitude towards
Rangers Football Club known. There has been no explanation for, or denial of, these remarks.

“It must be clear to you why, in the absence of an explanation of denial, Rangers can have no faith in your impartiality.”

The only ways Rangers can get an independent inquiry is for it to be either granted by the SPFL board or if three clubs call for an EGM and it gets 75 per cent approval in a vote.

 

Daily Record.

 

 

 

 

There's yer dinner. Fuck you MacLennan, we are coming for ya.

[magic8ball 27,901]

1 minute ago, MoodyBlue1872 said:

Nothing really new in the Sunday Liam stuff.

Thing is it’s all together in the one place to a wider audience than just a Rangers forum ,we all know the SPFL are a corrupt shower of bastards but the penny hasn’t really dropped much outwith our support 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,767]

10 minutes ago, doc holliday said:

The 4 Rangers Demands To The SPFL

 

Rangers switched tactics in their bid for an independent inquiry into votergate – by adding Murdoch MacLennan to their SPFL hitlist.

Chairman Douglas Park and the Ibrox club also aim to use the the league’s own rules against 
them – by turning whistleblower on the men they claim have brought the game into disrepute.

MailSport can reveal exclusively details of an explosive letter sent by Park to league supremo 
MacLennan in the wake of last week’s vote to end the season.

Having already called for the 
suspension of chief executive Neil Doncaster and legal advisor Rod McKenzie, Rangers now have deep reservations over MacLennan’s impartiality.

In the strongly worded letter in response to the SPFL chairman demanding to see any evidence of wrongdoing, Park:

#says he WON’T provide evidence unless MacLennan, Doncaster and McKenzie aren’t involved.

#wants a copy of the league’s
 official whistleblower policy so the trio can’t have access to it.

#demands McLennan explains derogatory comments he made about Rangers in the past.

#accuses him of attempting to shut down the club’s concerns by 
denying them free speech.

 

Rangers are adamant they have information which shows the
process of the resolution vote to be flawed, as well as calling the
governance and integrity of the SPFL into question.

But they won’t hand it over while Doncaster and MacLennan are still at the helm of the organisation.

In his letter, designed to heap more pressure on the SPFL hierarchy, Park says: “An initial request to share the evidence we hold came from one of the individuals (McKenzie) we’re seeking to have independently investigated and it would therefore have been wholly inappropriate to provide it in those circumstances.

“Rangers will readily share all of the information and evidence it has amassed with a properly constituted independent investigation.”

Gers want to know who they can take evidence to, given the conflicts of interest surrounding the trio.

Park also hit out at MacLennan, saying: “Can you provide Rangers with a copy of your organisation’s whistleblower’s policy, as an initial step towards establishing the framework for an investigation?”

Park also wants answers from MacLennan on anti-Rangers 
comments he allegedly made when he took up his position in 2017.

138259102799

In the letter circulated to all 42 clubs, he said: “It has been widely reported that you have previously made your attitude towards
Rangers Football Club known. There has been no explanation for, or denial of, these remarks.

“It must be clear to you why, in the absence of an explanation of denial, Rangers can have no faith in your impartiality.”

The only ways Rangers can get an independent inquiry is for it to be either granted by the SPFL board or if three clubs call for an EGM and it gets 75 per cent approval in a vote.

 

Sunday Mail

 

 

 

 

No independent investigation then.

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,765]

10 minutes ago, doc holliday said:

The 4 Rangers Demands To The SPFL

 

Rangers switched tactics in their bid for an independent inquiry into votergate – by adding Murdoch MacLennan to their SPFL hitlist.

Chairman Douglas Park and the Ibrox club also aim to use the the league’s own rules against 
them – by turning whistleblower on the men they claim have brought the game into disrepute.

MailSport can reveal exclusively details of an explosive letter sent by Park to league supremo 
MacLennan in the wake of last week’s vote to end the season.

Having already called for the 
suspension of chief executive Neil Doncaster and legal advisor Rod McKenzie, Rangers now have deep reservations over MacLennan’s impartiality.

In the strongly worded letter in response to the SPFL chairman demanding to see any evidence of wrongdoing, Park:

#says he WON’T provide evidence unless MacLennan, Doncaster and McKenzie aren’t involved.

#wants a copy of the league’s
 official whistleblower policy so the trio can’t have access to it.

#demands McLennan explains derogatory comments he made about Rangers in the past.

#accuses him of attempting to shut down the club’s concerns by 
denying them free speech.

 

Rangers are adamant they have information which shows the
process of the resolution vote to be flawed, as well as calling the
governance and integrity of the SPFL into question.

But they won’t hand it over while Doncaster and MacLennan are still at the helm of the organisation.

In his letter, designed to heap more pressure on the SPFL hierarchy, Park says: “An initial request to share the evidence we hold came from one of the individuals (McKenzie) we’re seeking to have independently investigated and it would therefore have been wholly inappropriate to provide it in those circumstances.

“Rangers will readily share all of the information and evidence it has amassed with a properly constituted independent investigation.”

Gers want to know who they can take evidence to, given the conflicts of interest surrounding the trio.

Park also hit out at MacLennan, saying: “Can you provide Rangers with a copy of your organisation’s whistleblower’s policy, as an initial step towards establishing the framework for an investigation?”

Park also wants answers from MacLennan on anti-Rangers 
comments he allegedly made when he took up his position in 2017.

138259102799

In the letter circulated to all 42 clubs, he said: “It has been widely reported that you have previously made your attitude towards
Rangers Football Club known. There has been no explanation for, or denial of, these remarks.

“It must be clear to you why, in the absence of an explanation of denial, Rangers can have no faith in your impartiality.”

The only ways Rangers can get an independent inquiry is for it to be either granted by the SPFL board or if three clubs call for an EGM and it gets 75 per cent approval in a vote.

 

Daily Record.

 

 

 

 

I agree. Do not hand over anything to those bastards. It is likely to fall in a shredder.

[Ned Ryerson 136]

9 minutes ago, doc holliday said:

The 4 Rangers Demands To The SPFL

 

Rangers switched tactics in their bid for an independent inquiry into votergate – by adding Murdoch MacLennan to their SPFL hitlist.

Chairman Douglas Park and the Ibrox club also aim to use the the league’s own rules against 
them – by turning whistleblower on the men they claim have brought the game into disrepute.

MailSport can reveal exclusively details of an explosive letter sent by Park to league supremo 
MacLennan in the wake of last week’s vote to end the season.

Having already called for the 
suspension of chief executive Neil Doncaster and legal advisor Rod McKenzie, Rangers now have deep reservations over MacLennan’s impartiality.

In the strongly worded letter in response to the SPFL chairman demanding to see any evidence of wrongdoing, Park:

#  Says he WON’T provide evidence unless MacLennan, Doncaster and McKenzie aren’t involved.

#  Wants a copy of the league’s
 official whistleblower policy so the trio can’t have access to it.

#  Demands McLennan explains derogatory comments he made about Rangers in the past.

#  Accuses him of attempting to shut down the club’s concerns by 
denying them free speech.

 

Rangers are adamant they have information which shows the
process of the resolution vote to be flawed, as well as calling the
governance and integrity of the SPFL into question.

But they won’t hand it over while Doncaster and MacLennan are still at the helm of the organisation.

In his letter, designed to heap more pressure on the SPFL hierarchy, Park says: “An initial request to share the evidence we hold came from one of the individuals (McKenzie) we’re seeking to have independently investigated and it would therefore have been wholly inappropriate to provide it in those circumstances.

“Rangers will readily share all of the information and evidence it has amassed with a properly constituted independent investigation.”

Gers want to know who they can take evidence to, given the conflicts of interest surrounding the trio.

Park also hit out at MacLennan, saying: “Can you provide Rangers with a copy of your organisation’s whistleblower’s policy, as an initial step towards establishing the framework for an investigation?”

Park also wants answers from MacLennan on anti-Rangers 
comments he allegedly made when he took up his position in 2017.

In the letter circulated to all 42 clubs, he said: “It has been widely reported that you have previously made your attitude towards
Rangers Football Club known. There has been no explanation for, or denial of, these remarks.

“It must be clear to you why, in the absence of an explanation of denial, Rangers can have no faith in your impartiality.”

The only ways Rangers can get an independent inquiry is for it to be either granted by the SPFL board or if three clubs call for an EGM and it gets 75 per cent approval in a vote.

 

Sunday Mail

 

 

 

 

Its becoming clear. Douglas Park is no mug. Sitting tight. Waiting to pounce. Mon Douglas.

[EverestGers 748]

7 hours ago, stu43rigger said:

Not sure if I’m being stupid but who’s pzj?

Need to know basis mate and you don’t don’t need to know 👀👍

[MoodyBlue1872 3,078]

9 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

No independent investigation then.

Nope. 

"The only ways Rangers can get an independent inquiry is for it to be either granted by the SPFL board or if three clubs call for an EGM and it gets 75 per cent approval in a vote." 

Not going to be granted and even if it made it to an EGM, it's never going to get 75%.

[MoodyBlue1872 3,078]

Also, the whistleblower probably from the SPFL. By Park asking for the whistleblower policy he’s probably letting them know where the evidence is coming from. 

Park /the club must have a copy of the Whistleblower Policy already, so he is dangling their chain. 

[Colin Traive 22,847]

Good statement, keeps up the pressure, cards still close to the chest and recent confirmation that Hearts and Aberdeen also want an inquiry just notches it up a little further.

👍

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,765]

Looks like Park wants to ensure whistleblower protection. If that happens we may get more coming forward.

[Ned Ryerson 136]

2 minutes ago, Colin Traive said:

Good statement, keeps up the pressure, cards still close to the chest and recent confirmation that Hearts and Aberdeen also want an inquiry just notches it up a little further.

👍

Good call. It seems to be steps, ratcheting up one notch at a time. Seems to me that Douglas is one of us without doubt. Mon Douglas.

[6superbarry6 14,159]

Hardly been in here because “ Rangers fans “ doing my head in, hard work fucking hell, Fucking brain damage 

[magic8ball 27,901]

4 minutes ago, 6superbarry6 said:

Hardly been in here because “ Rangers fans “ doing my head in, hard work fucking hell, Fucking brain damage 

It’s like a match day thread at times 😂

[the cry was no 3,035]

Would be a great time for someone to ask celtic if they back an independent investigation and if not , why not?

as a club prone to espouse integrity You’d assume the would be appalled if anything underhand was happening right under their noses 

[Colin Traive 22,847]

1 minute ago, the cry was no said:

Would be a great time for someone to ask celtic if they back an independent investigation and if not , why not?

as a club prone to espouse integrity You’d assume the would be appalled if anything underhand was happening right under their noses 

Sounds like a job for one of our courageous journalists, not us.

[bluenoz 30,918]

2 minutes ago, the cry was no said:

Would be a great time for someone to ask celtic if they back an independent investigation and if not , why not?

as a club prone to espouse integrity You’d assume the would be appalled if anything underhand was happening right under their noses 

Who? The club who are suddenly quiet as a mouse.

[the cry was no 3,035]

1 minute ago, Colin Traive said:

Sounds like a job for one of our courageous journalists, not us.

Agreed CT, wasn’t suggesting we ask them. 
 

[Ned Ryerson 136]

7 minutes ago, the cry was no said:

Would be a great time for someone to ask celtic if they back an independent investigation and if not , why not?

as a club prone to espouse integrity You’d assume the would be appalled if anything underhand was happening right under their noses 

A club adept at sweeping aside child abuse?