Jump to content

them


MisterC

Recommended Posts

Just now, Colin Traive said:

The one earlier in this thread.

The ball is launched to O’Riley (?) who squares it to Kyogo who has now returned to an ONSIDE position. But when the ball was played forward initially and the defenders were working out who to cover, he was yards offside and occupying the defenders, therefore interfering with play.

Hes not occupying the defenders at all. They're not even paying attention to him. That's why it's worked out so well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ZZed said:

Bye line and centre the ball again. Can't be off side from a back pass.

That’s not true btw, but when you’ve got two ahead of their last defender you’re never going to be off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gazzalivesforever said:

Thats the new offside rules unfortunately. When the pass is played out wide to their winger, he's not interfering therefore he's not offside. He doesn't become active until the pass comes in to the box and at that point he's onside. They're taking advantage of a mental flaw in the offside rule.

But the defenders have to be watching him, aware of him and positioning themselves accordingly.

Would they behave differently if he wasn’t there? Yes, so he’s interfering with play.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Colin Traive said:

But the defenders have to be watching him, aware of him and positioning themselves accordingly.

Would they behave differently if he wasn’t there? Yes, so he’s interfering with play.

That's just now how the rules have worked for a long time now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Colin Traive said:

But the defenders have to be watching him, aware of him and positioning themselves accordingly.

Would they behave differently if he wasn’t there? Yes, so he’s interfering with play.

Tbf if the defenders have half a brain they will acknowledge that he isn't interfering with play and play accordingly. As in track the winger as usual 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Colin Traive said:

The one earlier in this thread.

The ball is launched to O’Riley (?) who squares it to Kyogo who has now returned to an ONSIDE position. But when the ball was played forward initially and the defenders were working out who to cover, he was yards offside and occupying the defenders, therefore interfering with play.

Nah that’s not how it works hasn’t been offside for something like that for probably 20 years or so now lol I certainly can’t remember the last time that was viewed as offside anyway pretty much all the big attacking teams around Europe do that 

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said:

Kyogo may as well just stand on the six yard line offside all match waiting for square balls.

I know it's legal but the amount of times he deliberately gets into offside positions to gain an advantage does my fucking nut in.

 

Goldson does it for set pieces and it pulled off a few times.

Dont see the issue with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Colin Traive said:

But the defenders have to be watching him, aware of him and positioning themselves accordingly.

Would they behave differently if he wasn’t there? Yes, so he’s interfering with play.

I don't understand how you find it difficult to comprehend. In accordance with the current offside rules, he's not offside. Whether we agree with it or not doesn't matter. It's a shitey definition of the rule and they're taking advantage of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bydo said:

This is why we MUST beat them next week. We are not the kind of team that will dish out 7-0 (or more) pumpings. 

It was worth a point to them last season and it’s heading that way again this. 
They 7 better off as it stands after 5 games ? That’s huge already 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, rabc10000 said:

Tbf if the defenders have half a brain they will acknowledge that he isn't interfering with play and play accordingly. As in track the winger as usual 

I’d go mental at my centre backs if they ignored him because everyone knows that’s where the ball will end up.

So they ARE aware, they SHOULD be positioning themselves to be able to respond which means that he IS influencing the game, ie interfering with play.

This idea that he can stand ten yards offside and it doesn’t matter is insane, anywhere but a scum game in Scotland.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Exceptions

Of course, there are exceptions…

Any rule that generates this much controversy and confusion is bound to have exceptions.

And offsides in soccer are no exception, either.

An attacking player does not commit an offence when they receive the ball directly from:

1. Goal kicks

2. Corner kicks

3. Throw-ins

4. Dropped balls

Also, it’s not an offside offence if the attacking player plays a ball that was last deliberately played by an opponent.

This is different from saves and deflections we mentioned in the previous section. Those lead to offences.

What this means is an offside player doesn’t commit an offence in situations like:

• Latching onto the ball after a deliberate tackle by an opponent

• Latching onto a misplaced pass from an opponent

Also, there are “exceptions” that follow naturally from the rules for offside positioning and offences.

For example, an attacking player isn’t offside if:

• They are involved with or influence play in any way from their own half

• They receive a backwards pass. For example, from a teammate closer to the opposition goal line than them.

Backwards-pass.thumb.jpg.aa0f808395c3d730152bf282f6096425.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    • 21 September 2024 16:30 Until 18:30
      0  
      Rangers v Dundee
      Ibrox Stadium
      Premier Sports Cup
×
×
  • Create New...