Jump to content

Should We Target Shankland?


BlueSuedeSambas

Should We Target Shankland In January?  

205 members have voted

  1. 1. Should We Target Shankland In January?



Recommended Posts

Just now, esquire8 said:

If he cost the same as Dessers or Lammers then I'd still pay it. At least you are guaranteeing some sort of return on your money.

Nah I wouldn't. Just because we spent over 3 million on bums doesn't justify doing it here.

We need someone who is of thay standard and Shankland isn't a 3 million pound footballer. He's fine for Scottish football but he's not going to improve and most of his goals are from the penalty spot which he won't get here.

For a million or less yeah I'd take him but I want better than him to parter Danilo. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to do it was before or after his time in Belgium. Hearts would look to gouge us something rotten now. We have wasted enough money in overpaying for players without doing today the same again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Godfather said:

Nah I wouldn't. Just because we spent over 3 million on bums doesn't justify doing it here.

We need someone who is of thay standard and Shankland isn't a 3 million pound footballer. He's fine for Scottish football but he's not going to improve and most of his goals are from the penalty spot which he won't get here.

For a million or less yeah I'd take him but I want better than him to parter Danilo. 

Think he would get alot more goals if he got alot more service which is what would happen here. 

He's not going to be cheap, but it's far better than pissing more money against the wall on foreign guys we hope might do the business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, The Godfather said:

Nah I wouldn't. Just because we spent over 3 million on bums doesn't justify doing it here.

We need someone who is of thay standard and Shankland isn't a 3 million pound footballer. He's fine for Scottish football but he's not going to improve and most of his goals are from the penalty spot which he won't get here.

For a million or less yeah I'd take him but I want better than him to parter Danilo. 

Ideal then as that’s where we’re really needing to start picking up trophies.

He’s not the second coming and isn’t going to magically solve our problems but we are a team that’s goal shy. Domestically he would be absolutely fine for us. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stevemac said:

would rather Miovski as theres potential there being younger, but wouldn't have an issue with Shankland if the money was right

Miovski can't move at all and Shankland is far more involved in the link up play with Hearts than Miovski is too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KyleBJK said:

Ideal then as that’s where we’re really needing to start picking up trophies.

He’s not the second coming and isn’t going to magically solve our problems but we are a team that’s goal shy. Domestically he would be absolutely fine for us. 

Yup. We should also be picking up decent scottish talent wherever possible.

Dessers and Yilmaz or Shankland and Doig? No brainer imo and we chose wrong.

McGinn and Robertson wouldn't have come to us but they show there is EPL quality up here many turn their noses up at. Domestically others would prosper at Rangers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KyleBJK said:

Ideal then as that’s where we’re really needing to start picking up trophies.

He’s not the second coming and isn’t going to magically solve our problems but we are a team that’s goal shy. Domestically he would be absolutely fine for us. 

His numbers arent amazing when you take out the fact he won't get our penalties. So no its not ideal.

Colak was better than him and we chucked him and I'd also say the same for Sakala. We can't just go chucking money at things because we keep making a complete cunt of transfers. We need to bring in someone of value. We need a better striker than him of we get that them he can come in as backup that would be fine.

We start thinking Shankland is the answer then its no wonder we pick up fuck all trophies. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, J-Maestro said:

Miovski can't move at all and Shankland is far more involved in the link up play with Hearts than Miovski is too.

I think that's being overlooked too. He can link play up fairly well and can win battles in the air. 

He isn't the top tier striker we need to lead the line most weeks, but he'd be a good squad option who would add depth and can actually contribute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Negri's lovechild said:

I think that's being overlooked too. He can link play up fairly well and can win battles in the air. 

He isn't the top tier striker we need to lead the line most weeks, but he'd be a good squad option who would add depth and can actually contribute.

I'd feel far more comfortable with him than I would with Wright or Lammers out wide. People go on about how Shankland hasn't scored as much when he's been out wide plenty for Hearts.

Most other SPL teams best player could contribute in our squad, don't have to be a starter but even Walter played Derek McInnes in some important games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, J-Maestro said:

I'd feel far more comfortable with him than I would with Wright or Lammers out wide. People go on about how Shankland hasn't scored as much when he's been out wide plenty for Hearts.

Most other SPL teams best player could contribute in our squad, don't have to be a starter but even Walter played Derek McInnes in some important games.

Exactly. 

Its about the squad makeup. We wont have 22 players who are all going to be of the same standard, as much as we would like, but we need to have players there who can come in and do a job when required, and potentially stay at the club for a while to add some consistency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Voted yes, but it very much depends on price, I fear Hearts would want far more than he is worth.

£1.5 M would be absolute tops for me, I like the idea of maybe offering a player like Wright to get the price down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the price Hearts would want he wouldn't be worth it.

Also as others have said, if our forward line wasn't so shite he wouldn't be in the conversation. The fact is we could, and should, have bought better than him in the summer. At least that's the expectation I think most of us have for our club and I would expect the same come Jan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
×
×
  • Create New...