esquire8 43,649 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 5 minutes ago, Loyal72 said: Quite obvious though even without VAR to Walsh, if they're checking potential handball against celtic, it must've hit the player in some form. Why restart with the GK and not our corner? Because VAR cannot change the decision that Walsh gave a goal kick. Only if the handball warrants an onfield review or not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKingObv 10,657 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, Loyal72 said: Quite obvious though even without VAR to Walsh, if they're checking potential handball against celtic, it must've hit the player in some form. Why restart with the GK and not our corner? Because that would be changing a goal kick decision using VAR, which isn't allowed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ger4life_1872 29,819 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 7 minutes ago, Loyal72 said: Btw, no one is asking the most obvious question. If Collum felt the handball was accidental and there's no offside check, why does a goal kick get given? Why don't Rangers get the corner from the tim "accidentally" knocking it out with his hand? Because the ref has gave a goal kick , var cant change that Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_4 35,234 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 35 minutes ago, esquire8 said: Gordon Dalziel letting slip that Collum gives certain clubs favours on SSB before they try and backtrack. Not exactly the brain of Britain is he. There as a comedy act. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SeparateEntityMyArse 54,297 Posted January 4 Popular Post Share Posted January 4 Just waiting on Resolution 1888 to be announced that allows league points to be docked from teams at the discretion of the sfa. Blue Rino, Bobby Hume, Blumhoilann and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Malkytfp1 18,770 Posted January 4 Popular Post Share Posted January 4 15 hours ago, Bears r us said: SFA absolute wankers, I wonder if we will respond to that? We have to. The statement also clearly reads that irrelevant of the "offside", The official (with a history of anti-rangers decisions) has taken the decision that based on the handball alone there is no need to go to the monitor. He has made the decision that there is no claim for a penalty and Walsh doesn't need to see it which is where the corruption starts. Hadron Collider, Blumhoilann, scottyscott1963 and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loyal72 12,202 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, esquire8 said: Because VAR cannot change the decision that Walsh gave a goal kick. Only if the handball warrants an onfield review or not. I honestly think that one of the stupidest things. Ah we clearly got that wrong. Can't change it though. scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 43,649 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, Loyal72 said: I honestly think that one of the stupidest things. Ah we clearly got that wrong. Can't change it though. Let's be honest it was the only thing Collum got right at that moment. Everything else was a fucking car crash. scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post STEPPS BOY 75,072 Posted January 4 Popular Post Share Posted January 4 10 minutes ago, esquire8 said: The VAR referee is the only one who authorises image releases to the broadcaster. The AVAR is only there to assist him. You have no idea who Authorised it and this is the point. The penalty was always going to be excused as a subjective opinion by Collum so there was no point really challenging that. The whole crux is why someone went to the bother of drawing the lines to show offside and why if Collum thought it wasn’t a pen. AGM_72, Bobby Hume, kelvd1873 and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,441 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 16 minutes ago, Bears r us said: SFA absolute wankers, I wonder if we will respond to that? We absolutely should especially that bit at the bottom about comprising the safety of matchday officials. Are they for real. Only one fanbase has threatened match day officials when results haven't gone for them and it certainly isn't us. Blumhoilann and Bears r us 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post STEPPS BOY 75,072 Posted January 4 Popular Post Share Posted January 4 This should be the question Rangers are asking. scottyscott1963, RFCRobertson, BlueKnight87 and 4 others 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bears r us 30,998 Posted January 4 Popular Post Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Malkytfp1 said: We have to. The statement also clearly reads that irrelevant of the "offside", The official (with a history of anti-rangers decisios) has taken the decision that based on the handball alone there is no need to go to the monitor. He has made the decision that there is no claim for a penalty and Walsh doesn't need to see it which is where the corruption starts. It was a hellish decision and was so clear from the camera behind the goals, a clear penalty. I am also not convinced it was off side either. VERITAS VOS LIBREBETS, Blumhoilann, Malkytfp1 and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,998 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, BlueKnight87 said: We absolutely should especially that bit at the bottom about comprising the safety of matchday officials. Are they for real. Only one fanbase has threatened match day officials when results haven't gone for them and it certainly isn't us. That was really bad and surely our board will respond to it. If we let them away with what they are insinuating then it will be a black mark on Bisgrove IMO. BlueKnight87, scottyscott1963 and Blumhoilann 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,195 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 11 minutes ago, Loyal72 said: Quite obvious though even without VAR to Walsh, if they're checking potential handball against celtic, it must've hit the player in some form. Why restart with the GK and not our corner? He gave a goal kick before VAR got involved. He couldn’t then change his decision from GK to a corner based on VAR. scottyscott1963 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacky Bear 912 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 9 minutes ago, BlueKnight87 said: We absolutely should especially that bit at the bottom about comprising the safety of matchday officials. Are they for real. Only one fanbase has threatened match day officials when results haven't gone for them and it certainly isn't us. Correction They assaulted and attacked a referee. Who then set the tone later same day by not sending off their Goalie who actually caught the ball for the 1st time that day but outside the box. This on fear of a riot. This tone been finely tuned since by the committee of propaganda and abusers. BlueKnight87 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,441 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, Bears r us said: That was really bad and surely our board will respond to it. If we let them away with what they are insinuating then it will be a black mark on Bisgrove IMO. Board have too. Would they put that on at the end for other Scottish clubs not a chance. It's just another example of us getting painted as the bad guys when we rightly question their decision making. Blumhoilann, Negri's lovechild, Bears r us and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bears r us 30,998 Posted January 4 Popular Post Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, BlueKnight87 said: Board have too. Would they put that on at the end for other Scottish clubs not a chance. It's just another example of us getting painted as the bad guys when we rightly question their decision making. It has Liewell written all over it, I don't know if he has any official role at the SFA, but his tentacles can still reach anywhere he wants to go I have no doubt. Hadron Collider, Blumhoilann, Bobby Hume and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post SeparateEntityMyArse 54,297 Posted January 4 Popular Post Share Posted January 4 Match ref misses blatant handball. Var ref decides HE doesn't think its a foul so doesn't give match ref opportunity to see what he missed, and correct his error. SFA try to justify their fuck up by introducing offside images which aren't relevant as neither official saw incident as a foul. SFA doubles down, backs officials and blame Rangers for not being happy with the above. Scottish football doing what it does best. BlueKnight87, LineysLament, murzo and 8 others 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,441 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 5 minutes ago, Bears r us said: It has Liewell written all over it, I don't know if he has any official role at the SFA, but his tentacles can still reach anywhere he wants to go I have no doubt. We all know it's him that runs things really. Doncaster has always been a puppet. Remember the rousing speech shite when the Dundee vote got pushed through. Board have to really fire back on this. Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post beararse 6,476 Posted January 4 Popular Post Share Posted January 4 18 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said: Knew i had seen your work before. 🤣 TBF I ’m no’ too shabby at drawing provided they’ve got 4 legs or are just a head TheKingObv, Bears r us, Roy Hobbs and 5 others 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacky Bear 912 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Over to you Mr Bennett and Mr Bisgrove. This is your moment put on a plate by the corrupt tripping themselves up. Don't let us down, unforgettable if you do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,998 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, BlueKnight87 said: We all know it's him that runs things really. Doncaster has always been a puppet. Remember the rousing speech shite when the Dundee vote got pushed through. Board have to really fire back on this. That is how I see it and he needs stopped, the question is does our board have the balls to take them on? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
beararse 6,476 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 hours ago, Inigo said: Does the other frame show conclusively that the ball has been struck? The reason I ask is I'm wondering if procedure is to only use a frame where it can be said without doubt that the ball has been struck, i.e. it has actually moved. Not that it matters, because as you say the frame used is actually more favourable to us, but just out of curiosity. I think match footage would show the ball was actually struck In that moment or 1/50th of a second thereafter. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1963 904 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 No SFA meeting minutes available ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,676 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, beararse said: I think match footage would show the ball was actually struck In that moment of 1/50th of a second thereafter. You have to go by frames though, because you probably have to get the earliest frozen moment it has actually moved to the slightest degree. If the ball hasn't moved there is no way to prove it's been touched. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.