Jump to content

We Will Follow Rangers

Verified
  • Posts

    11,247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by We Will Follow Rangers

  1. 5 hours ago, The Beast said:

    Which means by implication the rest of us don't have your high levels of intelligence.

    What do you do, as a SNP voter, when bears sing Unionist songs; or GSTQ or Rule Brittania and wave the Union Flag?

    Do you stand and fume quietly or maybe you just don't go to Ibrox?

    Good to see you back posting mate.

  2. 5 minutes ago, ianb1547 said:

    Assuming this goes through (and no, I don't support it although I shielded for 5 months and am double jabbed) I am wondering what time supporters will have to start getting in to Ibrox to be in for 3pm.

    45-50k supporters and it will take at least 10 seconds, if not considerable longer, for someone at each entrance to check the 'passports' is a helluva lot of extra  time that needs to be factored in.

    Surely it would only need to be checked once and a quick show of photo ID to confirm its your smart card after that?

    If its this or reduced attendances due to infection rates its an easy decision.

  3. Head says we need to be a lot more savvy,  in their dark and sordid history they've provided plenty of ammunition that no faux offended cunt can say jack shit about without going near religion or race. We've long lost the pr war and we're a natural target for politicians who to pander to their hatred to secure votes to keep themselves in power, and because we're everything they despise.

    Heart says fuck them all, fenian bastards.

  4. 1 minute ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

     It may happen, who knows. Parks the company can do as they please. He has a fiduciary duty to Parks as well as Rangers, something Doncaster has but never seems to follow it. He may still stay on the Rangers board even if he steps down but he may have to go to court on behalf of Parks.

    The SFA and SPFL are in a precarious position.

    Indeed, I'm taking the clubs agreement to abide by local arbitration as the club being pretty confidant about its position, a wee bit of fighting only the battles you know you can win, its also pretty clear its part of a wider agenda to cleanse the SFA and SPFL.

  5. 1 minute ago, Blue Nosed Babe said:

    This is a contractual dispute not a sporting one. If arbitration fails, we go to court.

      UEFA statutes, Article 60 - Obligation to Refer Disputes to Court of Arbitration. Any Dispute be referred in the last instance to an independent and impartial court of arbitration, to the exclusion of any ordinary court. The club cant take an association to local law court.

    Article 59 states that In order to play in Europe, every year, we have to confirm to UEFA in writing that the club, its players and officials have acknowledged and accepted these obligations.

     

  6. 13 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

    I'm not following you here mate. All I'm trying to say is we have a habit of signing players who aren't ready to play. This guy, Sakala, the boy from Bournemouth (even before his heart problem). 

    Look at Abraham at Roma. Transferred a few days ago and starts today.

    It's just a little frustrating especially since we have so many with niggling injuries.

    You'd fucking hope a 34m signing would be a starter.

    The market we're in requires taking a punt on rough diamonds and polish them, some will have flaws, the odd one will shine.

×
×
  • Create New...