BlueMe
-
Posts
13,953 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
60
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by BlueMe
-
-
3 minutes ago, Smile said:
You are both wasting my time now. Your argument seems to be you would both rather have a player who pushes and shoves against the filth than scores goals.
We have no one who troubles them, yet we dont need a striker. As I said this is pointless and will be my last word on this topic.
Have a nice productive day.
Sorry mate, I'll let you get back to licking your bedroom window.
Cheers.
- Smile and BlueSuedeSambas
-
2
-
1 minute ago, Smile said:
Round and round as I said pointless now.
Pointless because you've fucked it and don't have a counter argument tbh.
- Johnstone Burgh and The Dude
-
2
-
Just now, Smile said:
He pushed and shoved them is now up their with a striker scoring goals, give it a rest.
You said he struggles against them, when he clearly doesn't.
-
3 minutes ago, Smile said:
Yet always seems to struggle against the filth like many players he has a level he does well at. Dont see why this is even a talking point as we are not even talking about one or two games now.
Pointless continuing it in all honesty.
No he doesn't.
Not scoring against them doesn't mean he struggles against them. He's bullied their defence more than once.
Still talking shite.
-
47 minutes ago, Smile said:
Been told by actual idiots who fear their favourites being replaced rather than what's good for Rangers the strikers we have put no fear into this scum team two wee boys getting bossed by giants yet we have multiple wingers wake the fuck up.
I have wasted enough time on this subject due to clowns who dont want us to improve upfront.
Still ignoring the fact we've finished top scorers 2 seasons running and easily have the best striker in the league.
You said yesterday when i mentioned Morelos was the first striker to score 30 goals in a season since Boyd. How many goals did he score against celtic and did they "fear" him?
You've obviously made up your mind regardless of other people pointing out how clueless you are tbh.
"Been told by actual idiots"
Ffs
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- VallancesDog, Escobar, Supersonic and 6 others
-
9
-
Would've rather given him a chance than sign Lafferty tbh.
-
This subject has been done to death tbh.
-
10 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said:
Not exactly true. Candeias started 2 of those games. Worrall one and Fod was in goals. Candeias played 45 against Hibs as well.
Kent is a completely different type of player to Aribo. Personally I can't grasp any reason to pick that 11 yesterday.
Also if he wins nothing this season he should correctly be sacked. Goalposts being moved once again it seems.
I would've started Jones instead of Aribo/Kamara and Morelos instead of Defoe.
Can't see us winning nothing, but even if we did, i don't think Gerrard will be sacked tbh.
- Rangers_no1, Cedrick and eejay the dj
-
3
-
12 minutes ago, fanaticCR said:
Surprised people are agreeing that it will take time and that means tarriers will stroll to 10 in a row.
Getting closer to them financially takes time yes, beating them on the field to win trophies? It will not take a whole lot more than what we have already spent. We have signed squad players instead of 1-2 starters who would greatly improve the 11. We have been daft with our money instead of “quality over quantity”.
We get Kent back and it's game on.
-
2 minutes ago, BlueKnight87 said:
Can't speak for everyone but I was waiting until the window closes to see how we shaped up.
We were told the summer would be quality over quantity. With the window closing we look to have just added more quantity to the squad.
I was hoping for 3-4 players that could come straight in the team and force others to be sqaud options.
The 2 positions behind the strikers in the final 3rd was very important. We now look weaker in this area despite the additions.
I would've loved to see Kent back tbh.
Hopefully we have enough to see us through to the January window and add quality then.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, rabc10000 said:Unfortunately it takes a result and performance like yesterday to open people's eyes. Sat and read all the comments about how we were going to smash the by 4 or 5 easily, how they have a shit manager with a make shift defence etc.
It goes from one extreme to another on here about most topics tbh. People are either over-confident or over-critical and there's very rarely a middle ground.
Nothing has been won or lost yet and no players should be getting written off either imo.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
6 minutes ago, fanaticCR said:
Nah don’t be silly mate, @BlueMe has said it takes time. No rush anyway.
It does take time, clearly. What do you think we should do to quickly get closer to them financially?
Also, the fact that you're teaming up with the biggest mongo on here won't help your argument here at all tbh.
- BridgeIsBlue and Sparkle
-
2
-
7 minutes ago, fanaticCR said:
Plenty of time. Here we go to 12, 13 and 14 in a row.
We could throw millions at it and risk fucking it financially as well tbf.
Here we go to division 3, 2, 1.
-
Just now, fanaticCR said:
Just to be clear, your happy finishing second for the foreseeable and not winning anything? Maybe sneaking a cup victory now and then?
Of course i'm not happy.
I am realistic though and understand it takes time to build a successful team and even then, it'll be a huge achievement if we manage to do it when we're basically using free transfers and loans.
-
7 minutes ago, fanaticCR said:
How can Burnley financially compete with Man City
but we can’t with the tarriers.
Mate ffs.
They can't, that's why i used them to make my point.
-
Just now, fanaticCR said:
It’s funny how none of that patter is rolled out when season tickets are out.
Come support Rangers and hope for more points than last year, and stay even with the tarriers for 4-5 games.
What patter?
Some posters go mental when Aberdeen, Kilmarnock, Hearts or some other shite beat us and say we should be winning these games because we have huge financial resources in comparison.
These same posters are then expecting us to compeate and win silverwear against a team who have huge financial resources in comparison to us.
That's the point I'm making here. It's not the board who are coming out and saying this incase they don't sell season tickets, this is just my opinion and the facts are there to see tbh.
-
4 minutes ago, rabc10000 said:
Agree, would have been dif if he said the manager of man City, Chelsea or man utd would be sacked if they don't win the premiership down south
Why?
They're all able to compete with each other financially, so it's not even close to the point i'm making.
Ffs
-
Just now, fanaticCR said:
There**.
Buzzing we managed to get past East Fife.
We got past them because we can afford better players than them and have a massive turnover and wage structure in comparison, so should be easily beating them.
Much the same way celtic have been cleaning up domestically for years tbh.
-
Just now, fanaticCR said:
You’ve compared us to Burnley and Everton
Read my posts again if you're struggling mate.
All the answers are in their for you.
-
Just now, thehost said:
You carry on. Meanwhile, in the real world, if he doesn’t win the league he will be punted and rightly so.
Soon as the board take heat he will be punted.
He can, of course, make this a non-issue by actually picking a football team and get them playing football. Something, to date this season, that he hasn’t managed to get them to do in the league.
I'll carry on being realistic.
He won't be sacked if he doesn't win the league.
-
Just now, fanaticCR said:
That sort of attitude is how you turn into one of those diddy clubs. You must be easily pleased each season, hope for a semi of a cup, maybe beat the time once.
So you jumped in without understanding my point and fucked it basically and you're now talking some shite about my attitude for some reason.
Ffs.
-
1 minute ago, fanaticCR said:
The stupidest thing I’ve read on here in a long time.
Really?
The likes of Manchester United, Liverpool, Man City etc all have a massive turnover and wage structure in comparison to Burnley and Everton, so it's hardly stupid to make that comparison.
Investment
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
His argument was fucked yesterday and gradually got worse tbh.
"We need a more physical type of striker"
We'll just ignore the fact that we already have the best striker in the league who's main attribute is his physicality and is nicknamed Buffalo because of it.