Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent

[Bears r us 30,800]

9 minutes ago, Jamie29 said:

Are they literally hiding behind him in this photo?

If you look through that thread someone had put the other three behind him. He certainly has the width. 😁

[Blumhoilann 6,712]

2 minutes ago, foghorn leghorn said:

I like virgins btw.

I'm too old to remember 😉

 

[foghorn leghorn 608]

1 minute ago, Blumhoilann said:

I'm too old to remember 😉

 

So am I tbh.

[Blumhoilann 6,712]

Just now, foghorn leghorn said:

So am I tbh.

🤣

[foghorn leghorn 608]

Dundee said NAW.

[magic8ball 27,901]

21 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said:

His blood type is definitely Gravy.

And if he isn’t a peadophile why does he try and look like one 

[dee9 3,972]

My tadger has taken a beating today the amount of lamb shanks I've had over RM.

Tomorrow I will need to take it easy however don't think that's going to be possible by the looks of it.....

[kelvd1873 7,168]

14 minutes ago, .Williamson. said:

That'll never happen

No harm to anyone but if we couldn't boycott when fucked down the league's we never will

Williamson that was a totally different time pal, we had to show loyalty as that’s all we really had. Remember the famous we don’t walk away quote the bheggars used to hit us over the head with?
 

We are now are in a better position on and off the field. We could now absolutely pull off boycott after boycott imo, probably with the exception of old firm games, and we absolutly should once we know who or what team has been caught with their dicks in their hands. 

[Escobar 13,676]

13 minutes ago, .Williamson. said:

That'll never happen

No harm to anyone but if we couldn't boycott when fucked down the league's we never will

Agreed mate, I don’t think it’ll ever happen.

[Blue Nosed Babe 20,696]

3 minutes ago, dee9 said:

My tadger has taken a beating today the amount of lamb shanks I've had over RM.

Tomorrow I will need to take it easy however don't think that's going to be possible by the looks of it.....

Just make sure it doesn't fall off or get burned.

[dee9 3,972]

Just now, Blue Nosed Babe said:

Just make sure it doesn't fall off or get burned.

😂😂😂😂

[ricksen92 460]

17 minutes ago, Jamie29 said:

whats the story with Ladbrokes?

Something in contracts about posting on social media.

[Sweetheart 8,458]

I wonder if this evidence will be handed to the fraud squad for an independent investigation.

[foghorn leghorn 608]

6 minutes ago, dee9 said:

My tadger has taken a beating today the amount of lamb shanks I've had over RM.

Tomorrow I will need to take it easy however don't think that's going to be possible by the looks of it.....

You might end up needing a circumcision ffs

[.Williamson. 82,281]

6 minutes ago, kelvd1873 said:

Williamson that was a totally different time pal, we had to show loyalty as that’s all we really had. Remember the famous we don’t walk away quote the bheggars used to hit us over the head with?
 

We are now are in a better position on and off the field. We could now absolutely pull off boycott after boycott imo, probably with the exception of old firm games, and we absolutly should once we know who or what team has been caught with their dicks in their hands. 

Won't happen

[tannerall 25,935]

8 minutes ago, Sweetheart said:

I wonder if this evidence will be handed to the fraud squad for an independent investigation.

Not sure how that works for sporting clubs. 

On the one hand they are responsible to their associations rules and regulations (especially when it applies to on the field events like team and player discipline, fans running on the park etc), but more importantly they are also business, who are subject to company law (whatever that entails).

Can anyone clarify ? My thoughts are that if there are financial irregularities, financial rigging or bad business practice then the fraud squad should be brought in.

Something I'm sure any shareholder or customer would expect if it was involving  a business which is morally and financially corrupt.

 

 

[Blumhoilann 6,712]

12 minutes ago, dee9 said:

My tadger has taken a beating today the amount of lamb shanks I've had over RM.

Tomorrow I will need to take it easy however don't think that's going to be possible by the looks of it.....

So you're 'self-isolating' 😉

[dee9 3,972]

Just now, Blumhoilann said:

So you're 'self-isolating' 😉

😉

[tannerall 25,935]

2 minutes ago, Blumhoilann said:

So you're 'self-isolating' 😉

Self abusing more like. 

[Blumhoilann 6,712]

Just now, tannerall said:

Self abusing more like. 

😂

[Sweetheart 8,458]

2 minutes ago, tannerall said:

Not sure how that works for sporting clubs. 

On the one hand they are responsible to their associations rules and regulations (especially when it applies to on the field events like team and player discipline, fans running on the park etc, but more importantly they are also business, who are subject to company law (whatever that entails).

Can anyone clarify ? My thoughts are that if there are financial irregularities, financial rigging or bad business practice then the fraud squad should be brought in.

Something I'm sure any shareholder or customer would expect involving  a business which is morally and financially corrupt.

 

 

I'm of that opinion too. If Company law has be broken then it's a matter for the fraud squad and not the SFA. I hope someone can clarify.

[Blumhoilann 6,712]

One club trying to gain an advantage thru corrupt means,corporate or sporting is surly fraud and should be dealt with legally imo.

[Bad Robot 21,154]

2 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

They cant come up unless 90% vote for it.

They change the rules as they go along

[Jb85 1,783]

 

[tannerall 25,935]

1 minute ago, Sweetheart said:

I'm of that opinion too. If Company law has be broken then it's a matter for the fraud squad and not the SFA. I hope someone can clarify.

Another angle could be that if there were financial bribes, irregularities , blackmail even, etc, then surely any member of the public could notify the police of a crime being committed and the police  would be obligated to investigate ?