Worrying Stat for Brenda from today

[scottyscott1963 18,411]

7 hours ago, Captain Hilts said:

He should be worried that he shagged a bloke. 

Never knew he shagged him,just thought they were a pair of boaby suckers.

[Deanzmeanzheinz 4,312]

And we say they’re obsessed?  Car crash of a thread - out of BD post haste 

[loyalfollower 1,543]

7 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

I'd sacrifice a player to man mark Brown. I don't think he's great, but his passing stats etc and his style show that he dictates their pace, aggression, directness etc. He is their vital cog, its not coincidence they struggle anytime he's out. I'd honestly say to Holt or Barjonas to ignore the game other than to be a max of 1 yard from his side.

Do this and I'm pretty certain it's a level playing field.

 

Bang right.  He gets so much free space that he has bundles of time on the ball to pass backwards or sideways. The question is do we have a player disciplined enough to man mark him for the full game? Also would they be willing to take a tackle and not over react as that’s what browns best skill is.

ive said it many times but when Rodgers reverted to 4-4-2 back in March as Armstrong got injured, brown got pushed further into midfield and never had any influence from 70 min onwards. And that was only up against hyndman

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

7 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

I'd sacrifice a player to man mark Brown. I don't think he's great, but his passing stats etc and his style show that he dictates their pace, aggression, directness etc. He is their vital cog, its not coincidence they struggle anytime he's out. I'd honestly say to Holt or Barjonas to ignore the game other than to be a max of 1 yard from his side.

Do this and I'm pretty certain it's a level playing field.

 

Against us he has dictated and commanded the last 4 OF games - and rattle him and we rattle the team - I agree he needs man marked. Jack could do this but needs to keep the head as Brown is also a slimy fuck that gets away with a lot more than he should. 

[K.A.I 36,183]

9 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said:

Against us he has dictated and commanded the last 4 OF games - and rattle him and we rattle the team - I agree he needs man marked. Jack could do this but needs to keep the head as Brown is also a slimy fuck that gets away with a lot more than he should. 

The last player we had that could do that type of job on Brown was Kevin Thomson and with us at his peak he is miles ahead of Jack. If we do get money from somewhere we need to spend good money on this type of player - I just don’t think Jack is that great the more I see of him. He’s ok but not as amazing as some think.

[Gazzalivesforever 1,987]

Stats mean Fuck all. The only important stay is the one that counts goals and they scored three, hibs scored two.

[.Williamson. 82,516]

We allow them to sit on top of our defence 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,784]

26 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said:

Against us he has dictated and commanded the last 4 OF games - and rattle him and we rattle the team - I agree he needs man marked. Jack could do this but needs to keep the head as Brown is also a slimy fuck that gets away with a lot more than he should. 

I don't just mean tackle and rattle him.

The majority of their play comes from keeper / defence through him. He has passing stats high 90% dictating pace and direction of their play until typically he sees a forward pass.

Having a player shadow his every move would prevent all this and I don't think they've anyone else who would step in.

For me it's about having a player so close he's not a viable pass as much as having someone who can match up physically with him. Holt could be that terrier, Barjonas seems to have a good engine and physicality...

But need to win today first and foremost...

[thehost 11,061]

op is obviously a filth supporter, or worse, a #hiredhand

[MasterD 7,435]

Don’t think that stat will worry him. They won the game.

We should be more worried that the mini-taigs give them a better game than we do.

[Creampuff 22,628]

8 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

I'd sacrifice a player to man mark Brown. I don't think he's great, but his passing stats etc and his style show that he dictates their pace, aggression, directness etc. He is their vital cog, its not coincidence they struggle anytime he's out. I'd honestly say to Holt or Barjonas to ignore the game other than to be a max of 1 yard from his side.

Do this and I'm pretty certain it's a level playing field.

 

Pena, though his performance was criticised, done a great job of neutralising Brown first half of the Old Firm.

[Jack The Flipper 5,936]

i think our best chance man marking brown would be with dorrans, someone like rossiter would have been perfect but he's made of meringue

would be great to have thompson or hemdani type player

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,784]

Just now, Creampuff said:

Pena, though his performance was criticised, done a great job of neutralising Brown first half of the Old Firm.

For me he still got on the ball too much and controlled the pace of the game. There must have been 6 or 7 times he / they had the luxury of playing it between our lines in that first half alone. Everything still went through him.

I'd want someone to effectively write off any involvement in contributing to the game other than man marking him from start to finish. That's not a role for Pena.

 

[harlands plater 16,989]

Other teams seem more capable of creating chances against them than we have the past few times. There's Hibs have taken four off them in two games recently.

We hardly lay a glove on the bastards these days, it's pathetic how powder puff we are against them.

[Creampuff 22,628]

Imagine Brown trying his nonsense when we had Barry Ferguson in the midfield?  

[Jack The Flipper 5,936]

1 minute ago, Creampuff said:

Imagine Brown trying his nonsense when we had Barry Ferguson in the midfield?  

Fuck that, imagine him doing it with Souness in midfield 

[Hoss 267]

Stop with the obsession ?

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

They score for fun which covers up the fact they are shit at the back. 

[B1872 20,790]

3 hours ago, scottyscott1963 said:

Never knew he shagged him,just thought they were a pair of boaby suckers.

No he pumped his fake pussy apparently! ??

[kaiser1041 9,088]

Stupid fucking thread

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

4 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

I don't just mean tackle and rattle him.

The majority of their play comes from keeper / defence through him. He has passing stats high 90% dictating pace and direction of their play until typically he sees a forward pass.

Having a player shadow his every move would prevent all this and I don't think they've anyone else who would step in.

For me it's about having a player so close he's not a viable pass as much as having someone who can match up physically with him. Holt could be that terrier, Barjonas seems to have a good engine and physicality...

But need to win today first and foremost...

What I meant by rattle not clatter,  him - was put him of his game, prevent him dictating - I agree 100% with you ( go figure) - especially about today 

[eejay the dj 31,964]

13 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

I'd sacrifice a player to man mark Brown. I don't think he's great, but his passing stats etc and his style show that he dictates their pace, aggression, directness etc. He is their vital cog, its not coincidence they struggle anytime he's out. I'd honestly say to Holt or Barjonas to ignore the game other than to be a max of 1 yard from his side.

Do this and I'm pretty certain it's a level playing field.

 

I'm not sure about that one . The players that hurt us the most are their wide players . Yes Brown get's it too easy but I wouldn't think wasting a man on him would make a blind bit of difference .

 

[Coop 654]

One was a penalty to be fair.  When Simonuvic is out they are much weaker at the back.  Bitton is no centre back.  I think Gordon is their weak spot, he's told to pass the ball from the back and when you press all the players and him back there he ends up lumping it to the opposition.

[MrMckee 3,424]

What is this actual story of Rodgers and the tranny? Did it really happen? 

[scottyscott1963 18,411]

2 hours ago, B1872 said:

No he pumped his fake pussy apparently! ??

 

23 minutes ago, MrMckee said:

What is this actual story of Rodgers and the tranny? Did it really happen? 

Dont know how you feel about it Mr M???...but!!!!...i'm taking Chelseys version as the truth and that he slammed his D up it's arse.
A family of role models.
He shags trannys.
His son was involved on a sexual assault on a young girl by a gang and he thought it was banter.
The tranny shaggers brother is involved with the ira and carries coffins of terrorists.