John Lundstram

[Amokachi 3,014]

Looks in peak shape which is taking his game to the level we need. 

[the goal machine 7,803]

Two year deal wouldn’t be the worst idea in the world. 

[gmcf 34,234]

Lost count he's been my MotM since JC arrived . Back to the form he showed in our run to Seville . 

[JackAlex93 11,284]

Has excelled under Clement

[Blueshoff 11,844]

Pivotal is the word for last night's performance

[J-Maestro 11,110]

People saying we shouldn’t pay him what he’s on just now, would cost us a fucking fortune to try replace him.

[WilliamMunny 3,238]

We need an experience CM like Lundstram. I am all for him extending his stay. He would be hard to replace.

[STEPPS BOY 73,929]

If he’s signing a new deal then it should be on a reduced rate which tbf he’s never going to accept.

[VERITAS VOS LIBREBETS 3,321]

35 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said:

If he’s signing a new deal then it should be on a reduced rate which tbf he’s never going to accept.

Exactly - why would anyone when they are doing well accept a pay cut?

[Lord Lockin 3,912]

56 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said:

If he’s signing a new deal then it should be on a reduced rate which tbf he’s never going to accept.

 

[Southsider 300]

57 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said:

If he’s signing a new deal then it should be on a reduced rate which tbf he’s never going to 

How much will it cost to replace him?

If we can get someone as good on a free, fair enough.  But if we end up spending 3M+ then that's not a saving

 

[STEPPS BOY 73,929]

28 minutes ago, Southsider said:

How much will it cost to replace him?

If we can get someone as good on a free, fair enough.  But if we end up spending 3M+ then that's not a saving

 

If it’s 3 million on a young player that we could maybe flip or at worst get money back then it’s better than paying a 30yr old 30k a week for 3 years.

Tav,Goldson and Lundstram take away over 5 million a year from Rangers at moment and we’re likely never to get a single monetary return from any of them.

[STEPPS BOY 73,929]

37 minutes ago, VERITAS VOS LIBREBETS said:

Exactly - why would anyone when they are doing well accept a pay cut?

He’ll want as good a deal as he can get as it’ll be his last big deal.

We shouldn’t be offering any more big money deals to any players 30 or above.

[J-Maestro 11,110]

26 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said:

If it’s 3 million on a young player that we could maybe flip or at worst get money back then it’s better than paying a 30yr old 30k a week for 3 years.

Tav,Goldson and Lundstram take away over 5 million a year from Rangers at moment and we’re likely never to get a single monetary return from any of them.

Aye we should take a chance on a £3m + a wages on an inexperienced gamble to chase what we’ve already got. 

[Ross-Gazza genius 1,907]

26 minutes ago, STEPPS BOY said:

If it’s 3 million on a young player that we could maybe flip or at worst get money back then it’s better than paying a 30yr old 30k a week for 3 years.

Tav,Goldson and Lundstram take away over 5 million a year from Rangers at moment and we’re likely never to get a single monetary return from any of them.

We might not get a monetary return on them but if they contribute to us possibly qualifying for the Champions league or extended runs in Europe then it's justified. 

At the moment Lundstram is pivotal to the way we play under PC and if he thinks we should be trying to keep him then I'll trust that. 

There's other players we should be saving money on, at this moment in time it's not Lundstram. 

[J-Maestro 11,110]

8 minutes ago, Ross-Gazza genius said:

We might not get a monetary return on them but if they contribute to us possibly qualifying for the Champions league or extended runs in Europe then it's justified. 

At the moment Lundstram is pivotal to the way we play under PC and if he thinks we should be trying to keep him then I'll trust that. 

There's other players we should be saving money on, at this moment in time it's not Lundstram. 

A new signing is far more likely to succeed playing against someone who already knows the club and playing well(Lundstram, Tab, Goldson) than another new player too.

[Jimfanciesthedude 24,552]

He always had these performances in his locker, just was constantly asked to do other stuff that took him away from the job he can do well

Keep him, get sterling in there to learn from him and our midfield is as solid as its been for years

[STEPPS BOY 73,929]

16 minutes ago, J-Maestro said:

Aye we should take a chance on a £3m + a wages on an inexperienced gamble to chase what we’ve already got. 

Who says the replacement will be inexperienced? We are just about to sign a 22 year old with over a 100 games under his belt.

They do exist you know.

 

[J-Maestro 11,110]

1 minute ago, STEPPS BOY said:

Who says the replacement will be inexperienced? We are just about to sign a 22 year old with over a 100 games under his belt.

They do exist you know.

 

Aye how many games playing for a team that has to win every game?

[STEPPS BOY 73,929]

17 minutes ago, Ross-Gazza genius said:

We might not get a monetary return on them but if they contribute to us possibly qualifying for the Champions league or extended runs in Europe then it's justified. 

At the moment Lundstram is pivotal to the way we play under PC and if he thinks we should be trying to keep him then I'll trust that. 

There's other players we should be saving money on, at this moment in time it's not Lundstram. 

Like who?

What players do we have on 30k a week who are looking at a new multi year deal on same or maybe even improved terms up to wages like Tav, Butland and Goldson.

[STEPPS BOY 73,929]

Just now, J-Maestro said:

Aye how many games playing for a team that has to win every game?

  

what the fuck are you on about?

we’re hardly, if ever, going to be buying players like that.

[J-Maestro 11,110]

Just now, STEPPS BOY said:

  

what the fuck are you on about?

we’re hardly, if ever, going to be buying players like that.

Thats why we should keep Lundstram, go back to Football Manager.

[J-Maestro 11,110]

Experienced midfielder in his prime and in form, multiple MOTM performances.

Release him and sign a youngster.

Only on RM.

[Bluekev 44,003]

2 hours ago, J-Maestro said:

People saying we shouldn’t pay him what he’s on just now, would cost us a fucking fortune to try replace him.

I’ve said that mate. He’d cost at least £2mil to replace and I doubt that would even buy anyone near the standard that he is.

[STEPPS BOY 73,929]

Just now, J-Maestro said:

Thats why we should keep Lundstram, go back to Football Manager.

  
 

So we should be keeping Barasic instead of gambling on another full back?