Calling Decisions Out

[Rangers_no1 33,234]

39 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

- Forrest's lunge is a straight red for me.

Its never a red card.

Sterlings one earlier in the season we were up in arms about it being a red and that was worse.

Decisions go against us but its tedious seeing many of our fans become like scum fans over correct decisions.

[Vision 16,807]

2 hours ago, OrangeRab said:

If Raskin is fouling Hart, then Taylor has fouled Raskin and some ..

Their supposed to review all incidents in the lead up to a goal. 

If its not a goal then surely a penalty. 

[OrangeRab 3,096]

12 minutes ago, Scottywellhousetb said:

 it's really not rubbish m8, we're becoming wee whining bitches because we keep losing important games, we are currently the tarriers in the 90s 

That’s a mental take tbh. We’ve just been fucked out a Scottish cup (on the back of a season of big old firm calls go against us).

Fans have every right to be pissed off. That goal never gets disallowed if it’s the other end.

[Vision 16,807]

2 hours ago, The Godfather said:

Too far gone now really. 

The club sat silent when it started and now they are so brazen they would just laugh at us.

Solution is to build a team far superior to them that dodgey decisions won't cost us over the course. To do that with the financial deficit we have compared to them will be imo a minor miracle.

 

Had this argument with my brother and came to the same conclusion. 

There always gonna have more to spend than us if their getting CL money every season. 

[Inigo 32,761]

10 minutes ago, FlippinEck said:

He booked him for running out at him  

I didn't understand this tbh. He booked him for dissent, then rescinded it. 

So shouting at a referee and dissent are OK as long as you're right? Hmm. 

[MurrayWilson 3,529]

18 minutes ago, Vision said:

Their supposed to review all incidents in the lead up to a goal. 

If its not a goal then surely a penalty. 

Thats the thing. Two pretty clear fouls, one before the other. I would like to know what the correct course of action is in this instance. Im not that clued up on the laws of the game to say what a ref is supposed to do in this scenario. I suspect it should be to award a penalty. If thats the case then Rangers need to create absolute fuck over this. 

[ForeverAndEver 72,465]

Was I imagining us getting an offside gave against us from a goal kick btw? Or had there been a foul/offside gave rather than the goal kick?

[Inigo 32,761]

11 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

You are tedious with your constant whinging about other's opinions.

Lundstram has been sent off twice for similar challenges. Are they red cards? Probably not, but it's just another example of how we are reffed differently. I don't know how you can't see that.

Don't ever call me a scum fan, ya cunt.

Wasn't much like Lundstram's challenge tbh, as far as I remember. If someone can show the same contact on the ankle I'll stand corrected.

[Bad Robot 21,513]

42 minutes ago, Vision said:

Their supposed to review all incidents in the lead up to a goal. 

If its not a goal then surely a penalty. 

It gets worst every time you see it, absolutely sickening 

[bluenoz 31,354]

2 minutes ago, Inigo said:

Wasn't much like Lundstram's challenge tbh, as far as I remember. If someone can show the same contact on the ankle I'll stand corrected.

 

I thought it was a reckless slide tackle. I wouldn't mind seeing it again.

[RealWorldRich 831]

Taylor is absolutely all over Raskin for the entire sequence.  

 

 

 

[TheKingObv 10,698]

Genuinely don't think Raskin's 'push' has had any impact on Hart at all.

Looks like he's pushed him as Hart lunges forward whilst Raskin has his hands on him, but there's zero chance Raskin has had any meaningful impact on Hart. 

It needs to be seen in normal speed as that properly shows that the speed Hart flies forward at is clearly nothing to do with Raskin.

[Sparkle 53,941]

Cut out the personal abuse.

Everyone’s got different opinions, no need to be childish.  

[SeparateEntityMyArse 54,479]

Just now, TheKingObv said:

Genuinely don't think Raskin's 'push' has had any impact on Hart at all.

Looks like he's pushed him as Hart lunges forward whilst Raskin has his hands on him, but there's zero chance Raskin has had any meaningful impact on Hart. 

Watch how Hart ran a few yards past his right post so strong was the 'push'. He played for it cos he knew he'd made an arse of the cross. Beaton and Walsh were happy to oblige.

[bluenoz 31,354]

2 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said:

Shut the fuck up you old gimp.

 

could probably still dribble rings around you.

You don't even see how righteous you come across and your only retort is name calling. Pathetic Ha!

[Rangers_no1 33,234]

Just now, Sparkle said:

Cut out the personal abuse.

Everyone’s got different opinions, no need to be childish.  

Fancy doing your job correct? He called me a cunt, so why have you only deleted my post?!!

[Sparkle 53,941]

Just now, Rangers_no1 said:

Fancy doing your job correct? He called me a cunt, so why have you only deleted my post?!!

I think you’ll find I have. 

[Rangers_no1 33,234]

1 minute ago, bluenoz said:

could probably still dribble rings around you.

Hahahahah

Stick to the golf.

[BlueKnight87 17,499]

Taylor clearly fouling Raskin before. 

I feel we've been done again here and not the first time in old firms this season. 

As others said but it's too far gone now. Our board have too often have taking the dignified silence approach.

While that lot have it down to routine. If that had gone the other way today and we won they would be all over it in the media screaming. 

[Rangers_no1 33,234]

Just now, Sparkle said:

I think you’ll find I have. 

You hadn't when I posted that. 👍

[Redmond7 1,247]

23 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

I thought it was a reckless slide tackle. I wouldn't mind seeing it again.

In isolation I don't think it's a red - however given the yellows he gave in other situations it surely is, I mean you need to be consistent within the same match. 

[theiconicman 3,027]

With a half fit squad with youth players rounding it out, we matched them. Took the chuckle brothers in Walsh and Beaton to make sure they got out of jail.

Clement needs backed but once again the refs have handed the filth another easy route to £50m.

[bluenoz 31,354]

"A coming together" is interpreted as 'no foul to Rangers'

That's what the BBC are calling Scales obstruction on Sima.

[BlueAvenger 10,530]

7 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Watch how Hart ran a few yards past his right post so strong was the 'push'. He played for it cos he knew he'd made an arse of the cross. Beaton and Walsh were happy to oblige.

The fucker ran up the park with his fake outrage to influence Walsh and had the ball ready for a foul again to influence 

[hammer93 15,155]

41 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

Was I imagining us getting an offside gave against us from a goal kick btw? Or had there been a foul/offside gave rather than the goal kick?

You are right....we said it at the time