Another Article From Rangers Hater Waddell.

[Virtuoso 27,180]

You can just feel the hatred pouring out of him in that article.

Hopefully #55 causes the cunt a fatal coronary.

[Dickie 12,905]

Tell the cunt to put a Rangers scarf on and try to approach the paedodome from any direction and then we can discuss fan safety.

[Drunk and disorderly. 14,421]

1 hour ago, Jb85 said:

so we've killed the atmosphere with reducing their numbers but the old firm is known for its sectarian bile and its what everyone has been wanting  stamped out of our game. cant win.

He insinuates the scum support won't be safe at Ibrox too. There will be a high police to filth fan ratio in future as their allocation has been cut by 90 percent. There will be a ring of police around them. They'll be the safest cunts in Britain ffs!

He should be  concerned about more of their support being arrested as the police will be within metres of them in future. 

Those stupid cunts will still be daft enough to throw flares and damage seats. Jail beckons them.

[ForeverAndEver 71,482]

1 hour ago, hammer93 said:

Only in Scotland that we can have such hypocritical views

Hibs slash Rangers allocation and are lauded for looking after the interests of there own fans who are coming back in droves to watch lemmons free flowing hibs team.......Rangers do the exact same and we are killing the game??

The level of hatred towards our club is now borderlining obscene.....the prick talks about the hibs game and our statement then claims we are guilty of double standards?

Does anyone remember anyone coming out in defence of our statement out with anyone not associated with Rangers?

The answer to that question was no....in truth they didn't give a fuck about the loyal Rangers fans who since our demotion have travelled all over Scotland selling out allocations week in week out.

We have been getting shit upon for far to long now and at long last have flexed our muscles to tell them that we won't be getting shit on no more.....cunts like Waddell & Co can fuck up, if it's ok for hibs to look after there own then by fuck we had better start looking after our own.

Hibs were slaughtered on here/Twitter etc by our fans but we were praised for it by  the majority well from what I seen.

[gmcf 34,175]

52 minutes ago, Blue Rino said:

You would think the story would be, what an amazing support Rangers have and well done to the club for accommodating the incredible upsurge on season tickets.

Not in this cesspit,  Bad Rangers

Nah , that would be too positive mate . 

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,722]

The only chance we have is for is to have a board that challenge this corruptness from within, and an aware manager proactively referencing it to a UK and worldwide media platform when the opportunity arises.

The opportunity beckons. Time will tell if we have the Board and a manager willing to fight the fight.

[Deanzmeanzheinz 4,312]

11 minutes ago, Dickie said:

Tell the cunt to put a Rangers scarf on and try to approach the paedodome from any direction and then we can discuss fan safety.

Tell him to stand with a Poppy Scotland collection can at the bottom of their grotto and see what happens! 

[Jb85 1,783]

4 minutes ago, Drunk and disorderly. said:

He insinuates the scum support won't be safe at Ibrox too. There will be a high police to filth fan ratio in future as their allocation has been cut by 90 percent. There will be a ring of police around them. They'll be the safest cunts in Britain ffs!

He should be  concerned about more of their support being arrested as the police will be within metres of them in future. 

Those stupid cunts will still be daft enough to throw flares and damage seats. Jail beckons them.

another positive is they'll surely no get their shite banners in as their section is too small to have any decent sized ones in.

[markem 7,285]

2 hours ago, murzo said:

So what he wants is for Rangers to be constantly attacked and have negative stories about us published and for us to sit and let it happen. Fight fire with fire and they don’t like it.

Exactly - expect more of this type of lashing out and general shock as (if) we finally stop towing the line in accordance with what talentless, agenda driven bastards like him want from us. 

We will make a grave mistake if we put a toe in the water with this type of stuff. All out attack now and next stop for me would be notifying the relevant media houses what journalists are now permanently banned until a time they publicly apologise, which will never happen.

[Sparkle 53,587]

Fuck the one sided bridge building. What did we EVER get from it? They used it as an excuse to piss all over us without retort.

About time the people who run our club grew a pair - I'd like to see them shown a bit more often.

 

 

[TEFTONG 60,108]

4 minutes ago, Sparkle said:

Fuck the one sided bridge building. What did we EVER get from it? They used it as an excuse to piss all over us without retort.

About time the people who run our club grew a pair - I'd like to see them shown a bit more often.

 

 

You are lucky this post is not in the OT. ??

[writingranger 1,413]

Spare us all this kind of drivel.

[TheMotor 2,208]

The increasing bitterness and frequency of the media attacks on the club are the most positive indication yet that our board are finally doing something right.

If they were continuing to bend over to our enemies, we wouldn't be hearing a peep.

[surfsup2 1,535]

1 minute ago, TheMotor said:

The increasing bitterness and frequency of the media attacks on the club are the most positive indication yet that our board are finally doing something right.

If they were continuing to bend over to our enemies, we wouldn't be hearing a peep.

Yip it's about time we stood up to them all  as they can't handle a strong Rangers on and off the field.

im hoping this is since Douglas Park took a bit of control and if it is we welcome the fight bring it on???

 

[Leeds_Bear 8,110]

3 hours ago, Courtyard Bear said:

You would need to ask their bosses that question. 

We all know why their bosses do! I just wonder why our own support do, boycott their site/papers and let them stay in their own echo chamber. 

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

2 minutes ago, Leeds_Bear said:

We all know why their bosses do! I just wonder why our own support do, boycott their site/papers and let them stay in their own echo chamber. 

That’s just it though it’s not an echo chamber. 

We might not buy their papers or give them the hits, but the rest of Scottish Football laps this shit up and just feeds the narrative that all things bad are Rangers and all the rest of Scottish footballs troubles are down to us. 

We do need someone to be talking back at these cunts and putting a balanced narrative out there. 

[Ayrblue1 2,042]

Just read the hit piece there and it made me laugh. They cunts are fuming ? 

We do need someone to fight back though. I don't like people getting a free pass to slander our club whenever they feel like. 

But it does leave a smile on my face knowing they cunts are rattled 

[Redwhiteandblue 3,330]

3 hours ago, minstral said:

That will be the “building bridges” phase of Rangers’ return to football civilisationover then, eh? 

So much for the promised reintegration and reconciliation.

They’re back on the front foot, on the offensive, playing to the gallery the only way they know how – and it’s a pretty unedifying sight.

The question is, though, how naive do you have to be to buy this week’s smoke-and-mirrors operation?

The answer, it appears from the reaction, is “Just the right amount…”

On the surface, the sentiment of making sure their own supporters come first is laudable. 

But this isn’t really about that. Nor is it really about the Old Firm game.

It’s about money and how they can get their hands on more of it now. 

In a week where they’ve been totally embarrassed by a false-flag pursuit of Martin Skrtel, a player they could never afford but courted anyway, then claimed they hadn’t to save face, it’s clear they need cash and in a hurry.

By cutting celtic’s allocation from 8,000 to 800, they lose out on 7200 x £50, twice a season, a decent lift when the up-front fans’ dough has long gone.

However, if they think they can sell 5000 more season tickets in that stand by riding the Steven Gerrard tsunami, bringing in a couple of million quid now, it makes financial sense for them in the short term, especially if they don’t have any other sources of instant funding to get their new boss what he wants.

What about the long-term consequences though? 

Three things worth contemplating about their decision. Firstly, we’re constantly being told their derby is the single biggest selling point we have when it comes to global perception and TV deals. So what does destroying the fabric of it do to it as a Scottish football asset?

My colleagues in the Daily Record were debating it on Friday and one made the point that El Clasico survives just fine without away fans.

Of course it does because it’s one of the best games in the world. They could play it in a swamp and it would still be one of the best games in the world because they have 22 of the best players in the world.

Rangers and celtic have none of the best players in the world. The game’s notoriety, its infamy, its legend, is built entirely on its blood-curdling mayhem. Take that away and what are you left with? 

Part two of it is the hypocrisy. It’s barely five weeks since Rangers were spluttering with more Statement-based indignation at Hibs cutting their allocation at Easter Road.

“First and foremost Rangers hopes the safety of our fans, who will now be in only one section of the South Stand rather than filling it completely, will not be compromised by this decision, which beggars belief.”

So what about the safety of celtic fans in that little Trivial Pursuit-sized wedge of Ibrox between the Broomloan and the Sandy Jardine stands?

It’s an unpleasant enough experience in there as a Falkirk fan or one of any other diddy club, without the 10x magnification of hostilities their rivals bring out.

Can’t imagine the police will be thrilled at the idea of escorting 800 sandwiched-in celtic supporters at the start and end of a 5-0 pumping.

And the third thing is the tit for tat. They’ll say they don’t care but what if they’re bang in contention and suddenly have to go celtic Park to win the league? You think Rangers fans will think it’s a great decision then?

It’s disappointing celtic responded in kind but they were damned if they did and damned if they didn’t – and the “didn’t” bit would have come from their own fans, a PR hit they maybe rightly weren’t prepared to take. They can live the rest of us seeing it as petty and small-minded.

In amongst all that nonsense, you’ve also got the Gary Hughes debacle with the SFA. 

The Record broke the story in midweek that 12 years ago, in a trade publication when the self-confessed celtic-supporter and now-SFA board member was in the publishing business, he referred to Rangers fans as “the great unwashed”. 

The club’s indignation was Statement manna from heaven, demanding suspensions and enquiries into the man they’ve always suspected deep down was a Peter Lawwell place-man, despite the need for his independence as a non-executive director, there to hold all the vested interests of the others in check.

Another two things here – one, spare me the faux outrage over the language used.

For two clubs who sit around in glass houses lobbing boulders, in the grand Old Firm lexicon, calling rival fans “the great unwashed” is as close to clean football banter as the pair of them ever get in their vile world of sectarian poison.

Two, though, is where they have him over a barrel and the SFA will ultimately be left with no choice. It’s not that Hughes isn’t allowed a past – and God knows this is far enough back in it – or to support a team but they’ll be trotting this out every time there’s a decision goes a way they don’t like and claiming it’s tainted by the presence of “an enemy of the club”. 

If his independence is compromised then so is his role.

None of this is winning Rangers any friends, nor do they or their PR operation care.

The diplomacy of two years ago, of Stewart Robertson and Paul Murray talking fence-mending and contrition as their journey neared completion is gone, replaced by Trump-esque bluster and confrontation.

You’d think they’d learn at some point that the only statement they really need to make is to build a winning team. Anything else is just noise.

Where is this from?

[KeyserSoze 14,532]

1 hour ago, minstral said:

We have never taken positive action for year. We have let the media and Scottish Football pish all over us, while our board did nothing.

Not just our board though. We should bombard these fools with all sorts 

sadly though our default lies with other people to do something (like the board) rather than us, the supporters 

Alternatively- the only way this will stop is to win things and lots of it. 

[Leeds_Bear 8,110]

12 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

That’s just it though it’s not an echo chamber. 

We might not buy their papers or give them the hits, but the rest of Scottish Football laps this shit up and just feeds the narrative that all things bad are Rangers and all the rest of Scottish footballs troubles are down to us. 

We do need someone to be talking back at these cunts and putting a balanced narrative out there. 

I don’t deny that, it’s not what I’m saying though. 

[ForeverAndEver 71,482]

I don't see the problem with reading a story on the Sun's website or the DR.

[Bobby Hume 13,054]

3 hours ago, minstral said:

"None of this is winning Rangers any friends, nor do they or their PR operation care" ..........
a) We are Rangers nobody likes us and WE (really) don't care .... you got that right at least numbnut ..... 

"The diplomacy of two years ago, of Stewart Robertson and Paul Murray talking fence-mending and contrition as their journey neared completion is gone, replaced by Trump-esque bluster and confrontation." .......

b) Aaaaaaahhh! hahahahahahahah  welcome to the real world ya halfwit and now you are just making shit up (nothing new there of course) ...... who is the one spluttering and stuttering now? ..... could it be you're just a wee bit upset because you have lost your mole at Ibrox?

 "You’d think they’d learn at some point that the only statement they really need to make is to build a winning team. Anything else is just noise." ........

c) Duh! ....and when we actually do build a winning team, you will be one of the rabid scum we will drown into silence and then most assuredly ..... "You'll know us by our Noise ..... for we are the Brig'ton Billy Boys ..... HULLO! ...HULLO!"

 

 

[tannerall 25,935]

I looked at this subjectively and decided that the whole article was basically badly written, ill advised from an objective journalistic sense, and basically just there to attention seek as there is actually very little of a factual or objective nature.

 

On a more objective note however ,this single sentence surprised and shocked me.

"It’s an unpleasant enough experience in there as a Falkirk fan or one of any other diddy club, without the 10x magnification of hostilities their rivals bring out."

"Falkirk......or....any other diddy club"    "Diddy Clubs"  ?  That one sentence describing every other team in Scotland outwith us (and his beloved cellic) as "Diddy Clubs" shows that in reality he has a deep inbred, contemptuous and warped attitude towards the rest of Scottish football as well. 

So we have a journalist reporting  for a National newspaper who detests almost all the clubs he writes about. Couldn't make it up.......except in the Scottish media.

Objective and professional journalist my arse.

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

51 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:

I don't see the problem with reading a story on the Sun's website or the DR.

More hits more money, is that not how it works. 

[dougie76 15,359]