More business links between green and whyte.

[J88 0]

Ha ha kl bro mon the drum mullguy Derry

[Sweetheart 8,458]

Could anyone answer if that's a) greens signature and b) could it be an authorised person who signed it other than CG?

it looks like a person authorised has signed the application for CW as it is underlined at the bottom of the page

[RFC55 109,155]

it looks like a person authorised has signed the application for CW as it is underlined at the bottom of the page

I know I made that point about 11 pages back lol. I just don't know if that's CG or someone else who has signed it under whytes

[StrongbowLoyal. 36]

Could anyone answer if that's a) greens signature and b) could it be an authorised person who signed it other than CG?

Looks like Baz or Gaz or Daz...... but I'm half cut so It's "Gerry Adams" to the fucking Car Park.........

[RFC55 109,155]

Looks like Baz or Gaz or Daz...... but I'm half cut so It's "Gerry Adams" to the fucking Car Park.........

You're as bad as albertz123, you 2 are always pished

[legalbeagle 3,734]

I dont believe that is true. The effective date will be the one that is signed on the form, not when it is processed. I agree they have to be verified, but if they are, then there are questions that need to be asked.

Is your belief based on any actual knowledge? And stop using IF!

[Phil 1,150]

Assuming CG signed the alleged documents; although D&P did state the assets would be sold to Sevco 5088 when the CVA was rejected they were in fact sold to Sevco Scotland. I agree with the earlier thread which pointed out any exclusivity agreement would have been between the parties involved and not the proposed vehicle.

It's clear for me CG has duped CW, once the CVA was rejected he was no longer needed.

People will have their own views on the shafting of CW, personally I like it.

What I don't like is the apparent series of lies told by CG. His credibility is in tatters IMO. Unless he can prove this to be nonsense I think he's finished.

Cheers mate, agreed

[StrongbowLoyal. 36]

You're as bad as albertz123, you 2 are always pished

All we are saying "is give drink a chance"

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

No don't think he did, he said whyte had nothing to do with sevco scotland.

Pretty sure he said it about both. He said he was leading them on, but they were never officially involved.

[Phil 1,150]

it looks like a person authorised has signed the application for CW as it is underlined at the bottom of the page

Wouldn't surprise me if it was whyte that signed it ffs.

[BlueAvenger 10,283]

It just got worse Bears... there is a rumour that Charles Green's pal "darkie" Johnson may have been a Director too...........

[kanjo 26,332]

What happens if CG refuses to acknowledge or admit he authorised that signing?

Is there anything else to back it up? by leaving it for 10 months CW may not have a hope in hell really.

[Dennis 1,011]

What happens if CG refuses to acknowledge or admit he authorised that signing?

Is there anything else to back it up? by leaving it for 10 months CW may not have a hope in hell really.

Who knows what else whyte has up his sleeve?

[JCDBigBear 10,831]

Assuming CG signed the alleged documents; although D&P did state the assets would be sold to Sevco 5088 when the CVA was rejected they were in fact sold to Sevco Scotland. I agree with the earlier thread which pointed out any exclusivity agreement would have been between the parties involved and not the proposed vehicle.

It's clear for me CG has duped CW, once the CVA was rejected he was no longer needed.

People will have their own views on the shafting of CW, personally I like it.

What I don't like is the apparent series of lies told by CG. His credibility is in tatters IMO. Unless he can prove this to be nonsense I think he's finished.

That isn't correct. D & P documents state that if the CVA is rejected a new company (not Sevco 5088) would go newco route.

From Interim Report to creditors 10 July 2012

Offer 6 – Sevco

5.38 Consideration of £8.25m on successful implementation of a CVA contingent upon Champions League participation during the next three seasons. Should the CVA fail, a binding agreement to purchase the business, history and assets of the Club for £5.5m using a newly incorporated company. Trading the Club whilst a CVA was proposed was to be funded utilising future revenue and football debtor monies, as appropriate

[Getstiffed 8,863]

What happens if CG refuses to acknowledge or admit he authorised that signing?

Is there anything else to back it up? by leaving it for 10 months CW may not have a hope in hell really.

Yes there is evidence to back it up, there is "see, I told yeez di'nt ah" and "fucking knew it, summit smelt fishy about Green for the start".

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

Is your belief based on any actual knowledge? And stop using IF!

You have to use 'if' mate if you are discussing possibilities. Only when we get all the facts can you stop saying 'if'.

[mason boyne 40]

It just got worse Bears... there is a rumour that Charles Green's pal "darkie" Johnson may have been a Director too...........

:D

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

That isn't correct. D & P documents state that if the CVA is rejected a new company (not Sevco 5088) would go newco route.

From Interim Report to creditors 10 July 2012

Offer 6 – Sevco

5.38 Consideration of £8.25m on successful implementation of a CVA contingent upon Champions League participation during the next three seasons. Should the CVA fail, a binding agreement to purchase the business, history and assets of the Club for £5.5m using a newly incorporated company. Trading the Club whilst a CVA was proposed was to be funded utilising future revenue and football debtor monies, as appropriate

That is correct, but the authorisers of SevCo 5088 (if they hold the exclusivity) would need to decide and authorise the transfer to this new company.

It might have been that this exclusivity was amended, but we need to be told.

[J88 0]

That we dick whyte tryin to fuck us again Charlie needs to get this sorted and rapid

[He's blue he's white 717]

He said only he was a director in the interview the other day, his lies are coming out mate and like it or not he will be lucky not to be chased out of here.

IMO his bullshit and denial of having anything to do with whyte is very concerning

Agreed, IMO green will be gone very soon

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,190]

Another statement is due from Mr Green I presume

but really what a load of shite

[Carsons Dog 9,878]

Not if the papers published tonight turn out to be true. If these turn out to be true, then the effect is backdated and Whyte would have a claim that he did not authorise it and so it was illegal.

Your a trier - I will give you that

[TravelingWilBEARy 4,319]

People getting all hysterical over what will amount to no more than mischief making. I wonder if these people realise that their actions are a lot more detrimental to the club they purport to love than they realise.

[TravelingWilBEARy 4,319]

Another statement is due from Mr Green I presume

but really what a load of shite

Not with a board meeting tomorrow.

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

People getting all hysterical over what will amount to no more than mischief making. I wonder if these people realise that their actions are a lot more detrimental to the club they purport to love than they realise.

You are probably right that it will turn out to be mischief making, but I think it would be foolish to dismiss it without question.

I think we should be able to trust our CEO when he addresses us. If this turns out to be more lies, then it does not bode well for him.