Jump to content

McKay to Nottingham Forest - 500k


Murty

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

If true then its a poor deal, hope there is a half decent sell on clause or an increasing payment dependant on player performance. Don't think he would of been on big money at Rangers would much rather of kept him until January to see how the new signings bed in. Would probably of got a similar fee in January.

If we are paying a reported £1.3 million for Dorrans at 30 years old then Forest have got a bargain  when you consider the money sloshing around down south. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steven33jackie said:

If true then its a poor deal, hope there is a half decent sell on clause or an increasing payment dependant on player performance. Don't think he would of been on big money at Rangers would much rather of kept him until January to see how the new signings bed in. Would probably of got a similar fee in January.

If we are paying a reported £1.3 million for Dorrans at 30 years old then Forest have got a bargain  when you consider the money sloshing around down south. 

Think it's £750k plus add ons for Dorrans, but seen different figures quoted all over the place. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OneDavidCooper said:

Will be sorry to see him go. Talented player despite what all the wankers on here say.

Don't think i've seen more than a handful of people say he's not talented

Most people agree he's got talent but it means absolutley fuck all if the attitude/mental ability isn't there to cope when you come under criticism. 

Again, like others in our squad, they've had plenty of chances to fight for their Rangers career, another who hasn't took it and we'll be better off as a squad without him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FFS ..... £500,000.00 ..... are they sure they can afford it? .... or will we be getting paid in instalments ..... :p:

If we have not tied in some add on clauses to this deal ... then we just haven't got this transfer procedure thingy right at all .... and need people in who know what the fuck they are doing.

He may be inconsistent but he definitely has got talent ... this fee ... if correct does not show this ... it just shows a lack of good business sense on our part.

Here's betting we sell O'Halloran at a loss also .... as this seems to be our business strategy .... "going backwards with pride" ..... :p:

:UK:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, 1690tamRFC said:

Just watching sky sports news there and was talking about Dorrans coming in, under players out it had McKay to Forest for £1.5mil, no doubt that isn't correct but that's what was on it. 

I'd be happyish with that provided we've a sell on clause but 500k is a piss take 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 6superbarry6 said:

MacLeod is a better player than McKay tbf but was also sold ridiculously cheaply 

Well, it would be instructive to see how MacLeod got on, allowing for injuries.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...