Jump to content

Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent


OceanRain

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, OceanRain said:

Said the board couldn't continue to simply create this level of expectation among the support with their statements if they weren't then going to deliver the goods.

Edit: Heart and Hand

Cheers mate, that is not something I expected to read, but well done to them because it is so true IMO. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

Then the resolution should be invalid. The matter of the vote had nothing to do with reconstruction. They have been offered something that wasn't on the table to vote on.

Reconstruction was mentioned in the resolution on the 8th of April, every club knew about it when they voted.

“If the resolution is approved, the SPFL has also committed to consulting with Clubs over the possibility of League restructuring ahead of Season 2020/21.”

 

https://spfl.co.uk/news/spfl-clubs-to-vote-on-curtailment-of-ladbrokes-s

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, born a blue nose said:

Chris graham on bbc news saying the 10am deadline is the morra for a legal challenge 

 

Deadlines and statements . How did things ever get like this . Well at least we will know one way or the other by then 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eejay the dj said:

Deadlines and statements . How did things ever get like this . Well at least we will know one way or the other by then 

They have got to come out with something EJ , season ticket renewals will be brutal if they dont.........

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, the old guard said:

Dundee have admitted they would have voted yes if reconstruction was on the spfl mandate in the first place, begs the question have dundee just voted on a completely different resolution than the other 41 clubs? It was obviously changed to get their yes vote over the line, corruption at its finest and there can be no argument on that. 

That’s not true, the possibility of reconstruction was always part of the resolution 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, sassaaaa said:

They have got to come out with something EJ , season ticket renewals will be brutal if they dont.........

Will just be a statement stating a timeline and it being “suspicious” as well as asking again for an independent enquiry.

 

the press have now focused on reconstruction, we’ve missed the boat (again)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Brian Fantana said:

Will just be a statement stating a timeline and it being “suspicious” as well as asking again for an independent enquiry.

 

the press have now focused on reconstruction, we’ve missed the boat (again)

Probably and hell mend them with the consequences......

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important issue facing all of us at this time is the Covid-19 pandemic and the Board of Rangers sincerely hope all of our fans and their families are staying safe and healthy. Hopefully we will all be back supporting our team as soon as possible.

However, given events of the past week, we feel we should make comment on the SPFL resolution vote. No fair minded person can take the outcome of this vote seriously. The SPFL has conducted a process which has been misleading and deeply flawed.

In particular, publishing the outcome prior to all clubs having voted has undermined the democratic process and demonstrated unacceptable standards of corporate governance by the SPFL Executive.

We are extremely concerned that member clubs were not provided with enough information, or time, to allow them to make fully informed decisions.

Also, we are aware several club directors claimed they were being bullied at a time when Scottish football should have been acting in unity to alleviate the financial hardship of many of our clubs. Addressing the latter was one of our primary objectives and the resolution we presented could and should have been progressed.

The SPFL chose to obstruct our resolution which would have given clubs the required financial support, without the pre-condition of ending the season. The fact that this solution was not afforded sufficient consideration defies belief and further underlines the view held by many clubs that the processes and behaviours of certain individuals must now be the subject of forensic examination.

For our part, Douglas Park has already requested an independent investigation into the conduct of the executive. The SPFL appear to have acknowledged the need for an internal investigation – but only an independent investigation will provide satisfactory, credible answers. We repeat our call for the immediate suspension of Neil Doncaster and Rod McKenzie pending the outcome of the independent investigation.

It is imperative that constructive engagement begins immediately with members to evaluate all options for completing the 2019/20 Premiership season, including on the field of play. The SPFL must allow every opportunity to do so. There is precedent within Scottish football that a league must not be compromised by changing the rules during the course of the competition.

The anger of our fans is understood and shared by our Board, who continue to examine all legal options available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...